Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: Linmao Li <lilinmao@kylinos.cn>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	edumazet@google.com, dsahern@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
	stephen@networkplumber.org, hannes@stressinduktion.org,
	sd@queasysnail.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v5] ipv6: addrconf: bail out of dad_failure when state is no longer POSTDAD
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 09:41:18 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260514064118.GA451826@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513025509.3776405-1-lilinmao@kylinos.cn>

On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 10:55:09AM +0800, Linmao Li wrote:
> addrconf_dad_failure() transitions ifp->state from DAD to POSTDAD
> via addrconf_dad_end(), which drops ifp->lock on return.  The lock
> is re-acquired after net_info_ratelimited().  A concurrent
> ipv6_del_addr() can take the lock in that window, set ifp->state
> to DEAD and run list_del_rcu(&ifp->if_list).
> 
> addrconf_dad_failure() then overwrites DEAD with ERRDAD at errdad:
> and schedules a new dad_work.  The work calls ipv6_del_addr()
> again, hitting the already-poisoned list entry:
> 
>   general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
>   CPU: 4 PID: 217 Comm: kworker/4:1
>   Workqueue: ipv6_addrconf addrconf_dad_work
>   RIP: 0010:ipv6_del_addr+0xe9/0x280
>   RAX: dead000000000122
>   Call Trace:
>    addrconf_dad_stop+0x113/0x140
>    addrconf_dad_work+0x28c/0x430
>    process_one_work+0x1eb/0x3b0
>    worker_thread+0x4d/0x400
>    kthread+0x104/0x140
>    ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> 
> Fold the addrconf_dad_end() logic into addrconf_dad_failure() under
> a single ifp->lock critical section.  The STABLE_PRIVACY branch
> temporarily drops ifp->lock around address regeneration, so at
> lock_errdad: verify the state is still POSTDAD before transitioning
> to ERRDAD; bail out otherwise to avoid overwriting a state set by
> another path while the lock was released.
> 
> Fixes: c15b1ccadb32 ("ipv6: move DAD and addrconf_verify processing to workqueue")
> Signed-off-by: Linmao Li <lilinmao@kylinos.cn>

Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>

      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-14  6:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-13  2:55 [PATCH net v5] ipv6: addrconf: bail out of dad_failure when state is no longer POSTDAD Linmao Li
2026-05-14  6:41 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260514064118.GA451826@shredder \
    --to=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lilinmao@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox