From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Junrui Luo <moonafterrain@outlook.com>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>,
Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@intel.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] iavf: validate num_vsis in VIRTCHNL_OP_GET_VF_RESOURCES response
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 19:56:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260518185611.GF98116@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SYBPR01MB788139F8F31129E4B64E66D4AF072@SYBPR01MB7881.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 02:55:04PM +0800, Junrui Luo wrote:
> The VF allocates a fixed-size buffer for IAVF_MAX_VF_VSI (3) VSI
> entries when processing a VIRTCHNL_OP_GET_VF_RESOURCES response from
> the PF. However, num_vsis from the PF response is used unchecked as
> the loop bound when iterating over vsi_res[] in multiple functions.
>
> A PF sending num_vsis greater than IAVF_MAX_VF_VSI, or the received
> message is shorter than num_vsis claims leads to out-of-bounds accesses
> on the vsi_res[] array.
>
> Clamp num_vsis based on the actual bytes copied from the PF response.
>
> Fixes: 5eae00c57f5e ("i40evf: main driver core")
> Reported-by: Yuhao Jiang <danisjiang@gmail.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Junrui Luo <moonafterrain@outlook.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Clamp num_vsis based on actual received message length instead of
> IAVF_MAX_VF_VSI suggested by Przemek
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/SYBPR01MB7881AF11C45AEDC0D4CA89C1AF062@SYBPR01MB7881.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
There is an AI-generated review of this patchset available on sashiko.dev.
However, I believe that the issues raised there can be considered in
the context of possible follow-up. I do not believe they should block
progress of this patch.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-18 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 8:51 [PATCH net] iavf: validate num_vsis in VIRTCHNL_OP_GET_VF_RESOURCES response Junrui Luo
2026-05-13 11:10 ` Przemek Kitszel
2026-05-14 6:55 ` [PATCH net v2] " Junrui Luo
2026-05-14 9:07 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-05-18 18:56 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260518185611.GF98116@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=danisjiang@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gregory.v.rose@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mitch.a.williams@intel.com \
--cc=moonafterrain@outlook.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox