From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21EAC39282C; Tue, 19 May 2026 22:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779231253; cv=none; b=ddg9eI9DXm27NGA0kGM8lCGXsc0pW5jd9mKqPVjSV7NNhDsWRXvtfjUrn8EgpH5kANPCBYrkrIvBYFFj9ZqPAtOthL2ElzD+tctauIvXq9ghnZ40djm9ihikNSU2pijtLzvTmjq9PlG+//zDBFtEmxRJ6jNgVzgZVwGCCNvAgz8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779231253; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aZmV0I+58HhCvhM3HZ7Fc5/N8EIbKC/scPluMlK+U+U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GEl1H23UhsJsGOxmOKpezSgjEsgOdhWGidYvoi4hnX1xmm7u+S+fUmswnETFMbkhWEFPIEdXYvBh/NSiGQCWqakgj2lBXEvKTwP8xnKu4Fi5DeAfgPoIUY8KpQr3kSSOWgC7sqEDctLuXFUZEIrpJzFE0vZ+YZ3jdR2D+SHFQds= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=i/pb68Dw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="i/pb68Dw" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 171BE1F000E9; Tue, 19 May 2026 22:54:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779231251; bh=aZmV0I+58HhCvhM3HZ7Fc5/N8EIbKC/scPluMlK+U+U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=i/pb68Dw1sO06PqCRhfVMB7Yehl0gCcwxW1qOIw+qNHqkLZ8ZLh0U7bzo95WT999v mzpxMjnk0huiH/nem4AUeGBdKI7giwEa+EOvKtoN0/z+ws9estm2bbyJtpfByM/Sa9 uHyFQ78/TOQ5+GvsQq1fkmvAN0NWrMbB2YJTeJkF6TpHbxVfOZroadWWI1ipyfhl9b 7i9/Mofuk/mtAyo6hwqCSyhhmICmo0JP2a0MIlO8rYmLA85mKyV1Jc+axyNCwi83rM V6DbgZD/FnzHVYZ4t7s30arldO2CtYCIyT0tZM/NqwjwaS36qKj1qtciKRLy2xSO1N hcTqNdt7eBQ4Q== Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 15:54:10 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Zijing yin Cc: Jiayuan Chen , Jakub Sitnicki , Stanislav Fomichev , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Qingfang Deng , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dev_addr_lists: don't WARN on GFP_ATOMIC kmalloc failure in netif_rx_mode_run Message-ID: <20260519155410.0526f104@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <8f25efa5-bd29-49d5-a260-e0ed0ab9ea75@gmail.com> References: <20260519095557.3749407-1-yzjaurora@gmail.com> <878q9fod8m.fsf@cloudflare.com> <8f25efa5-bd29-49d5-a260-e0ed0ab9ea75@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 19 May 2026 14:26:55 +0200 Zijing yin wrote: > Thanks! I will attach it accordingly.=20 Please don't top post. Please wait for Stanislav to chime in. =46rom maintainer's perspective it'd really be preferable if the author of the code had been given a day or two to fix the bug, rather than (forgive me) random people (forgive me) feeding the syzbot report=20 into an LLM. My recollection is that we added this WARN to convert the whole thing into pre-allocation / GFP_KERNEL if it actually hits on real systems.