From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: jelonek.jonas@gmail.com
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, andrew@lunn.ch, hkallweit1@gmail.com,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bjorn@mork.no, horms@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 2/2] net: sfp: extend SMBus support
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 16:42:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260520234208.565366-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260516135442.2234729-3-jelonek.jonas@gmail.com>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
---
net: sfp: extend SMBus support
Extend SFP SMBus read/write helpers to use SMBus word access and I2C block
access when advertised by the adapter, picking the largest supported transfer
per chunk.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
> @@ -756,50 +757,110 @@ static int sfp_i2c_write(struct sfp *sfp, bool a2, u8 dev_addr, void *buf,
> [ ... ]
> -static int sfp_smbus_byte_read(struct sfp *sfp, bool a2, u8 dev_addr,
> - void *buf, size_t len)
> +static int sfp_smbus_read(struct sfp *sfp, bool a2, u8 dev_addr, void *buf,
> + size_t len)
> {
> - union i2c_smbus_data smbus_data;
> + union i2c_smbus_data smbus_data = {0};
> u8 bus_addr = a2 ? 0x51 : 0x50;
> + size_t this_len, transferred;
> + u32 functionality;
> u8 *data = buf;
> int ret;
>
> - while (len) {
> - ret = i2c_smbus_xfer(sfp->i2c, bus_addr, 0,
> - I2C_SMBUS_READ, dev_addr,
> - I2C_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA, &smbus_data);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + functionality = i2c_get_functionality(sfp->i2c);
>
> - *data = smbus_data.byte;
> + while (len) {
> + this_len = min(len, sfp->i2c_block_size);
> +
Does this introduce an -EINVAL regression for ethtool -m during the initial
300ms module insertion window?
When an SFP module is inserted, sfp_check_state() sets the SFP_F_PRESENT
flag and schedules sfp_sm_mod_probe() to run after a 300ms delay.
Because sfp->i2c_block_size isn't initialized until sfp_sm_mod_probe()
runs, it remains 0 during this window.
If ethtool -m is run during this 300ms window, sfp_module_eeprom() proceeds
because SFP_F_PRESENT is set. This means this_len will evaluate to 0.
For adapters supporting I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_I2C_BLOCK, the code attempts
a 0-length I2C block read, which the I2C subsystem core explicitly rejects
with -EINVAL.
Prior to this patch, sfp_smbus_byte_read() bypassed the block size entirely
and safely executed 1-byte transfers during the 300ms window.
This also seems to expose a pre-existing deadlock in the pure I2C path.
For pure I2C controllers, sfp_i2c_read() is used. If this_len evaluates
to 0, i2c_transfer() is called with a 0-length read message. If the I2C
adapter returns success, the loop variables remain unchanged, causing an
infinite loop while holding rtnl_lock, which deadlocks the networking stack.
Is there a way to prevent reads before sfp->i2c_block_size is properly
initialized, or fall back to 1-byte reads when the block size is 0?
> + if (functionality & I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_I2C_BLOCK) {
> + smbus_data.block[0] = this_len;
> + ret = i2c_smbus_xfer(sfp->i2c, bus_addr, 0,
> + I2C_SMBUS_READ, dev_addr,
> + I2C_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK_DATA, &smbus_data);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + memcpy(data, &smbus_data.block[1], this_len);
> + transferred = this_len;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-20 23:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-16 13:54 [PATCH net-next v8 0/2] net: sfp: extend SMBus support Jonas Jelonek
2026-05-16 13:54 ` [PATCH net-next v8 1/2] net: sfp: apply I2C adapter quirks to limit block size Jonas Jelonek
2026-05-20 23:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-16 13:54 ` [PATCH net-next v8 2/2] net: sfp: extend SMBus support Jonas Jelonek
2026-05-19 8:05 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-05-20 23:42 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260520234208.565366-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jelonek.jonas@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox