From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1895A3859EE; Thu, 21 May 2026 14:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779372449; cv=none; b=m0eX6NGoUswu2gFUXIXN7DZMvXFa/TVx+xYZVIkJdXTSaQMl7RidiLWyAuD9ZPym6FHpzhWnKw906PVBS0FezBOFOUE5MNtauvLPxC6HtfLeGa+s2gv0vxKVaHg8G3jvPWAOvnPuJEutSAssfUNdBbpTtFqkzQgatyOy68/qfEs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779372449; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0a1EvytIIDKX0o6hs/rXNVLZx95abJo0lnvR7XdEMeQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fj093OMlNUARtPXukf7IvHQxM1AY0pgFcMfKzdi1L2OJriVD1pZnVThdEe8dDFcrlqURn9TUeX+KS/37Orw2MaENQpGr9kuVtM8rwcubSp2w7GZsZ1sXfoT3l+8JbiKNcG/y5984RqqXSY6vRJuLg8EHO3bGacZGELP/e+DrpL8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=LV9TtB7D; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LV9TtB7D" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 408D91F000E9; Thu, 21 May 2026 14:07:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779372447; bh=Hux3wBl2wp9SFbVQhL1hrxxZt9zoT5Tprz47lmjNneM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=LV9TtB7DEyPu3uMF2RQp0T428LhTMYjUyHn7bZgh7JtLF7QohiEJdNdPCy9YZOr2e 43agC6Gu6h+VSujC1Gdci+BOPIAfOfKg0fwhNVufM6rjSYC5LumgAEU2T7x1RH6PEB xsLR/K20+0kzST1fAYP5/TcQku9jjkS17JFHNeY00kl5F1oXjMxcoND6ZKE65WBQuc jVy1L1wzQKl8+s+afA9y49BJdq/jy19+nM1wZbugWnMAPKNQM9KvnbDG1g51kryUxv AtfadVmBSzfLBHmfTkxbd60Ocj0kASew3cst7sg5Zg2nj5xWvXVZrC1Q7C0DW0zDVT FMDBxO+J9nFRQ== Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 07:07:26 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jiayuan Chen Cc: Geliang Tang , John Fastabend , Sabrina Dubroca , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Shuah Khan , Geliang Tang , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: tls: use ASSERT_GE in test_mutliproc Message-ID: <20260521070726.3494d2b3@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <5978f34d-dbcf-4196-8a95-13165a5ba034@linux.dev> References: <0ee9f412b6bd1a260a547d19f979f73b396746ac.1779354585.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> <5978f34d-dbcf-4196-8a95-13165a5ba034@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 21 May 2026 18:57:32 +0800 Jiayuan Chen wrote: > > This results in a massive number of identical failure messages: > > > > # tls.c:1686:mutliproc_sendpage_writers:Expected res (-1) >=3D 0 (0) > > # tls.c:1686:mutliproc_sendpage_writers:Expected res (-1) >=3D 0 (0) > > ... (hundreds of identical failures) =20 >=20 > I think it=E2=80=99s worth backporting, so a Fixes tag is necessary. Why? Is this bothering someone? Are you guys hitting this in real life? I don't recall seeing such failure in netdev CIs.