From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60E6A35676D; Thu, 21 May 2026 15:27:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779377225; cv=none; b=cnBcqHrr3gChh8sQT4xklScWD9RvnCosi8jWCVe7AF2c5SMnTyQJnA7hQPpXeTEOfgMBelD7wdEQFx+5sdO+uS7iXvLD/wXu2ZZsDwPAnQMo1EaYSCP49rgKY3PFjH5pXpeS/YYjbwIFkMGS+P+EBmTXf7k+AhLEUobg67XEqyA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779377225; c=relaxed/simple; bh=t3MB2dT888WzKr+4v/7evtWQkQVbGao4c3jS/Wo5p84=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DATn3vdJCQb4O6hTtQkvDG24KyIY1shLDNW1C2erEw9W6RqVwSxZX1bm/hcQn0RoIJXMgt9HgplAWAkQowV/4Toa0y5FEslZS0Wu9xlYeBRisahgdkvCPJzf54LlRTn50kVK3tgY1SP60WbjtveZLZadTOQtspTB5H3uhVvBYg8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=lDn4m9UH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="lDn4m9UH" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E98A51F000E9; Thu, 21 May 2026 15:27:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779377224; bh=t3MB2dT888WzKr+4v/7evtWQkQVbGao4c3jS/Wo5p84=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=lDn4m9UHiR5bSYmGAkg64Xd2jUY8N0clJz+Yy556FWh3R0SPoyp4tSN3wJ+Qcf51D 33em4FlkEUfQyRx8dFQfmLOI/las1Q1jNEd1YXqKtp+bxWX4RxLq1n71yjWmn814f9 gg+LZLgazzD6tdm2ehGHl4xwHmbF04+u3ko1gPIu+hMpndx6Ou4AQ2E7XgLJt3pYvQ 1kgaFjGNu8BdnZ4lm0dhIee9coqkC/23iyMY0y1V8ncF3R8YjSJZStEKAEESZAwC5f AH6YvFlNsL0ZR3VqdSaKih4MUvRd55cKGU6OYtpQBWBfiRrSkEyt0ZExKZcooRuEPB 7WjhfKKK1dO4A== Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 08:27:03 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Andrew Lunn Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/5] ethernet: 3c509: Bring driver back and make some fixes Message-ID: <20260521082703.2991393f@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 21 May 2026 14:17:08 +0200 Andrew Lunn wrote: > The problem with these sorts of patches is that they often break > stuff. This driver has been stable for a long time. Do we care about > coding style issues enough that we are happy to possibly break it? Do > we want to spend time on debugging it? Probably more time than it took > to fix the checkpatch issues? The way I look at it, Maciej is the maintainer and has access to HW. If we have to keep this driver it's better to modernize it a bit. If nothing else it shows the maintainer is willing to put in the effort.