From: Chuang Wang <nashuiliang@gmail.com>
Cc: Chuang Wang <nashuiliang@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>,
Krishna Kumar <krikku@gmail.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4] net: reduce RFS/ARFS flow updates by checking LLC affinity
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 21:37:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260521133711.20725-1-nashuiliang@gmail.com> (raw)
The current implementation of rps_record_sock_flow() updates the flow
table every time a socket is processed on a different CPU. In high-load
scenarios, especially with Accelerated RFS (ARFS), this triggers
frequent flow steering updates via ndo_rx_flow_steer.
For drivers like mlx5 that implement hardware flow steering, these
constant updates lead to significant contention on internal driver locks
(e.g., arfs_lock). This contention often becomes a performance
bottleneck that outweighs the steering benefits.
This patch introduces a cache-aware update strategy: the flow record is
only updated if the flow migrates across Last Level Cache (LLC)
boundaries. This minimizes expensive hardware reconfigurations while
preserving cache locality for the application. A new sysctl,
net.core.rps_feat_llc_affinity, is added to toggle this feature.
Additionally, export sock_rps_record_flow_hash(). This resolves a symbol
visibility compilation error triggered by 'tun' using
sock_rps_record_flow_hash() in tun_flow_update() when CONFIG_TUN is
built as a module.
Performance Test Results:
The patch was tested in a K8s environment (AMD CPU 128*2, 16-core Pod
with CPU pinning, mlx5 NIC) using brpc[1] echo_server and rpc_press.
rpc_press Commands:
for i in {1..8}; do
./rpc_press -proto=./echo.proto -method=example.EchoService.Echo
-server=<IP>:8000 -input='{"message":"hello"}'
-qps=0 -thread_num=512 -connection_type=pooled &
done
Monitor mlx5e_rx_flow_steer frequency:
/usr/share/bcc/tools/funccount -i 1 mlx5e_rx_flow_steer
Frequency of mlx5e_rx_flow_steer (via funccount[2]):
Before: ~335,000 counts/sec
After: ~23,000 counts/sec (reduced by ~93%)
System Metrics (after enabling rps_feat_llc_affinity):
CPU Utilization: 38% -> 32%
CPU PSI (Pressure Stall Information): 20% -> 10%
These results demonstrate that filtering updates by LLC affinity
significantly reduces driver lock contention and improves overall
CPU efficiency under heavy network load.
[1] https://github.com/apache/brpc/
[2] https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/blob/master/tools/funccount.py
Signed-off-by: Chuang Wang <nashuiliang@gmail.com>
---
v3 -> v4: add rps_llc_check by Eric Dumazet
v2 -> v3: patch net -> net-next by Jakub Kicinski
v1 -> v2: add rps_feat_llc_affinity; add brpc tests
include/net/rps.h | 17 ++++------
net/core/dev.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
net/core/sysctl_net_core.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/rps.h b/include/net/rps.h
index e33c6a2fa8bb..65543354f6e6 100644
--- a/include/net/rps.h
+++ b/include/net/rps.h
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
extern struct static_key_false rps_needed;
extern struct static_key_false rfs_needed;
+extern struct static_key_false rps_feat_llc_affinity;
/*
* This structure holds an RPS map which can be of variable length. The
@@ -55,11 +56,14 @@ struct rps_sock_flow_table {
#define RPS_NO_CPU 0xffff
+bool rps_llc_check(u32 old_val, u32 new_val);
+
static inline void rps_record_sock_flow(rps_tag_ptr tag_ptr, u32 hash)
{
unsigned int index = hash & rps_tag_to_mask(tag_ptr);
u32 val = hash & ~net_hotdata.rps_cpu_mask;
struct rps_sock_flow_table *table;
+ u32 old_val;
/* We only give a hint, preemption can change CPU under us */
val |= raw_smp_processor_id();
@@ -68,7 +72,8 @@ static inline void rps_record_sock_flow(rps_tag_ptr tag_ptr, u32 hash)
/* The following WRITE_ONCE() is paired with the READ_ONCE()
* here, and another one in get_rps_cpu().
*/
- if (READ_ONCE(table[index].ent) != val)
+ old_val = READ_ONCE(table[index].ent);
+ if (old_val != val && rps_llc_check(old_val, val))
WRITE_ONCE(table[index].ent, val);
}
@@ -136,15 +141,7 @@ static inline bool rfs_is_needed(void)
#endif
}
-static inline void sock_rps_record_flow_hash(__u32 hash)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
- if (!rfs_is_needed())
- return;
-
- _sock_rps_record_flow_hash(hash);
-#endif
-}
+void sock_rps_record_flow_hash(__u32 hash);
static inline void sock_rps_record_flow(const struct sock *sk)
{
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 26ac8eb9b259..df8d328447bd 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4997,6 +4997,8 @@ struct static_key_false rps_needed __read_mostly;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rps_needed);
struct static_key_false rfs_needed __read_mostly;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rfs_needed);
+struct static_key_false rps_feat_llc_affinity __read_mostly;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rps_feat_llc_affinity);
static u32 rfs_slot(u32 hash, rps_tag_ptr tag_ptr)
{
@@ -5208,6 +5210,58 @@ static int get_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
return cpu;
}
+/**
+ * rps_llc_check - Determine if RPS flow table should be updated
+ * @old_val: Previous flow record value
+ * @new_val: Target flow record value
+ *
+ * Returns true if the record needs an update.
+ */
+bool rps_llc_check(u32 old_val, u32 new_val)
+{
+ u32 old_cpu = old_val & ~net_hotdata.rps_cpu_mask;
+ u32 new_cpu = new_val & ~net_hotdata.rps_cpu_mask;
+
+ if (old_val == new_val)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * RPS LLC Affinity Feature:
+ * Reduce RFS/ARFS flow updates by checking LLC affinity.
+ *
+ * Frequent flow table updates can trigger constant hardware steering
+ * reconfigurations (e.g., ndo_rx_flow_steer), leading to significant
+ * contention on driver internal locks (like mlx5's arfs_lock).
+ *
+ * This strategy only updates the flow record if it migrates across LLC
+ * boundaries. This minimizes expensive hardware updates while preserving
+ * cache locality for the application.
+ */
+ if (static_branch_unlikely(&rps_feat_llc_affinity)) {
+ /* Force update if the recorded CPU is invalid or has gone offline */
+ if (old_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_active(old_cpu))
+ return true;
+
+ /*
+ * Force an update if the current task is no longer permitted
+ * to run on the old_cpu.
+ */
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(old_cpu, current->cpus_ptr))
+ return true;
+
+ /*
+ * If CPUs do not share a cache, allow the update to prevent
+ * expensive remote memory accesses and cache misses.
+ */
+ if (!cpus_share_cache(old_cpu, new_cpu))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
/**
@@ -5249,6 +5303,17 @@ bool rps_may_expire_flow(struct net_device *dev, u16 rxq_index,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rps_may_expire_flow);
+void sock_rps_record_flow_hash(__u32 hash)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
+ if (!rfs_is_needed())
+ return;
+
+ _sock_rps_record_flow_hash(hash);
+#endif
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_rps_record_flow_hash);
+
#endif /* CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL */
/* Called from hardirq (IPI) context */
diff --git a/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c b/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c
index b508618bfc12..b6d4ebcbb6a6 100644
--- a/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c
+++ b/net/core/sysctl_net_core.c
@@ -210,6 +210,33 @@ static int rps_sock_flow_sysctl(const struct ctl_table *table, int write,
kvfree_rcu_mightsleep(tofree);
return ret;
}
+
+static int rps_feat_llc_affinity_sysctl(const struct ctl_table *table, int write,
+ void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+ u8 curr_state;
+ int ret;
+ const struct ctl_table tmp = {
+ .data = &curr_state,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(curr_state),
+ .mode = table->mode,
+ .extra1 = table->extra1,
+ .extra2 = table->extra2
+ };
+
+ curr_state = static_branch_unlikely(&rps_feat_llc_affinity) ? 1 : 0;
+
+ ret = proc_dou8vec_minmax(&tmp, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
+ if (write && ret == 0) {
+ if (curr_state && !static_branch_unlikely(&rps_feat_llc_affinity))
+ static_branch_enable(&rps_feat_llc_affinity);
+ else if (!curr_state && static_branch_unlikely(&rps_feat_llc_affinity))
+ static_branch_disable(&rps_feat_llc_affinity);
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_RPS */
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_FLOW_LIMIT
@@ -554,6 +581,14 @@ static struct ctl_table net_core_table[] = {
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = rps_sock_flow_sysctl
},
+ {
+ .procname = "rps_feat_llc_affinity",
+ .maxlen = sizeof(u8),
+ .mode = 0644,
+ .proc_handler = rps_feat_llc_affinity_sysctl,
+ .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
+ .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE
+ },
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_FLOW_LIMIT
{
--
2.47.3
next reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-21 13:37 Chuang Wang [this message]
2026-05-21 20:12 ` [PATCH net-next v4] net: reduce RFS/ARFS flow updates by checking LLC affinity kernel test robot
2026-05-21 23:16 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260521133711.20725-1-nashuiliang@gmail.com \
--to=nashuiliang@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=krikku@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox