From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: nihaal@cse.iitm.ac.in
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com, ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com,
johannes@sipsolutions.net, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: wwan: iosm: fix potential use after free in ipc_imem_cleanup()
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 08:08:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260521150828.851544-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260519064028.60992-1-nihaal@cse.iitm.ac.in>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
---
net: wwan: iosm: fix potential use after free in ipc_imem_cleanup()
This commit reorders ipc_imem_cleanup() so that ipc_task_deinit() runs
before ipc_protocol_deinit(), so a tasklet observed mid-flight does not
dereference protocol memory that has already been freed.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_imem.c b/drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_imem.c
> index 1b7bc7d63a2e..a3353af6960c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_imem.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/iosm/iosm_ipc_imem.c
> @@ -1256,8 +1256,8 @@ void ipc_imem_cleanup(struct iosm_imem *ipc_imem)
> ipc_imem_device_ipc_uninit(ipc_imem);
> ipc_imem_channel_reset(ipc_imem);
>
> - ipc_protocol_deinit(ipc_imem->ipc_protocol);
> ipc_task_deinit(ipc_imem->ipc_task);
> + ipc_protocol_deinit(ipc_imem->ipc_protocol);
[High]
Does this reorder fully close the cleanup race, or only the narrow window
between the tasklet and ipc_protocol?
The MSI handler ipc_msi_interrupt() remains registered throughout
ipc_imem_cleanup(); ipc_release_irq() / free_irq() is only invoked later,
from ipc_pcie_resources_release() after ipc_imem_cleanup() has returned.
Once ipc_task_deinit() returns, ipc_imem->ipc_task->ipc_tasklet has been
kfree()'d:
void ipc_task_deinit(struct ipc_task *ipc_task)
{
tasklet_kill(ipc_task->ipc_tasklet);
kfree(ipc_task->ipc_tasklet);
...
}
If the modem fires an MSI in the window between ipc_task_deinit() and
ipc_release_irq(), can the path
ipc_msi_interrupt()
-> ipc_imem_irq_process()
-> ipc_task_queue_send_task()
-> ipc_task_queue_add_task()
still dereference ipc_imem->ipc_task->ipc_tasklet (now freed) and call
tasklet_schedule() on it? Once kfree(ipc_imem->ipc_task) executes, the
q_lock and queue array are also freed.
The only attempt to quiesce the IRQ producer before this point is
ipc_imem_device_ipc_uninit(), which is best-effort: it is skipped when
ipc_pcie_check_data_link_active() returns false, has roughly a 30 ms
timeout, and does not call synchronize_irq().
This race appears to predate the patch (the freed-tasklet use-after-free
after ipc_task_deinit() was already reachable from the live IRQ handler),
so it is not introduced by the reorder. Would it be worth calling
ipc_release_irq() (or free_irq() / synchronize_irq()) before
ipc_task_deinit() / ipc_protocol_deinit() so that no MSI can schedule new
work against freed resources?
>
> kfree(ipc_imem->ipc_task);
> kfree(ipc_imem->mmio);
--
pw-bot: cr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-19 6:40 [PATCH net] net: wwan: iosm: fix potential use after free in ipc_imem_cleanup() Abdun Nihaal
2026-05-21 15:08 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260521150828.851544-1-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nihaal@cse.iitm.ac.in \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox