From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Tenzin Ukyab <ukyab@berkeley.edu>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 08/11] bpf: tcp: Reject BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVQ_CB if receive queue is not empty.
Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 07:44:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260522074601.1658705-9-kuniyu@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260522074601.1658705-1-kuniyu@google.com>
Unlike SOCKMAP, BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVQ_CB does not iterate existing
skbs in the receive queue when it is enabled for the first time.
In practical production use cases, this behavior is usually not
a problem.
We can safely assume that the upper-layer protocol is designed
with specific synchronisation points where the connection is
temporarily quiet.
At these points, the application can completely drain the receive
queue and safely enable BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVQ_CB while no skbs are
pending.
A prime example is an application transitioning from HTTP to an
RPC protocol:
Client Server
| |
| --- HTTP Upgrade request ---------> |
| | [Drain all skbs]
| | [Enable BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVQ_CB]
| <-- HTTP 200/Switching protocol --- |
| |
| --- RPC Frame 1 ------------------> |
However, to strictly prevent any potential race conditions arising
from unconventional upper-layer protocol designs, let's explicitly
signal a failure if BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVQ_CB is enabled while the receive
queue is not empty.
-EUCLEAN is chosen to indicate that the caller needs to clean up
the receive queue before enabling the feature.
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
---
net/core/filter.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 5913b3be9f1d..883e4aaed49e 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -5395,6 +5395,9 @@ static int bpf_sock_ops_check_rcvq_cb(struct sock *sk, int val)
if (unlikely(sk_is_mptcp(sk)))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ if (!skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue))
+ return -EUCLEAN;
}
return 0;
--
2.54.0.746.g67dd491aae-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-22 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-22 7:44 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 00/11] bpf: Add SOCK_OPS hooks for TCP AutoLOWAT Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-22 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 01/11] selftest: bpf: Use BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS + 1 for bad_cb_test_rv Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-22 8:22 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-22 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 02/11] bpf: tcp: Introduce BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVQ_CB Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-22 8:22 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-22 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 03/11] bpf: tcp: Support bpf_skb_load_bytes() for BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVQ_CB Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-22 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 04/11] tcp: Split out __tcp_set_rcvlowat() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-22 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 05/11] bpf: tcp: Add kfunc to adjust sk->sk_rcvlowat Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-22 8:22 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-22 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 06/11] bpf: tcp: Make BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVQ_CB and SOCKMAP mutually exclusive Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-22 7:44 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 07/11] bpf: mptcp: Don't support BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVQ_CB Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-22 7:44 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2026-05-22 7:45 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 09/11] bpf: tcp: Factorise bpf_skops_established() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-22 7:45 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 10/11] bpf: tcp: Add SOCK_OPS rcvlowat hook Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-05-22 7:45 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 11/11] selftest: bpf: Add test for BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVQ_CB Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260522074601.1658705-9-kuniyu@google.com \
--to=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=ukyab@berkeley.edu \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox