From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D39F7282F3E; Mon, 25 May 2026 18:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779732186; cv=none; b=kGCSzxl+QFwzmZkEt8ACiJihrOHVtxfYeqWoyNjJdfS0pmwv1lkyitcEQPYVo5KJHCIPdhB96bnlHs8Q4HQG0WC2FuRKarSAdInXKOHkRH0cbHf9Ve0PzejJWb2nobUydMzJnakjrZAIWRoacsCpiVmBPgI0NJ60XipdINQVJmY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779732186; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MaK4IkgXYWyF3KGpYTyhroCCXobtVKieVSAnv1bUvVo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ch+qXcsGkfpktEy34TLxVfpoCbQv4lplAlcbVXq0+e8tpNJV9NKsVgtkxZiY8uMz2DzuHtmmDvgRrH4ifK8oLOESVt8FBmqpVzfQTC99kkQW6tFUU/QeCXzIBxvHCC71mMR7XwoCYKopq6Z3waXMdcdTHJMH+vnSt5d9wBjfx3w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=cUABLCMN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cUABLCMN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A84931F000E9; Mon, 25 May 2026 18:03:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779732185; bh=EZmKZj0tmNuNOpUMVsW1hFiX64ghV2P+heHD4ObW+3Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=cUABLCMNTVGQSG6D53si59rS97g9ujXoHktcUNg4KIrddzSVHm7X7j3iyz9Y5V0ZM RHoFd9V6UICEHQPKm1o4vXPo2gsJI5S09BeeKDPrCFdIAdsbapzwXqWSgPi7icIgjw LKdFhB8C68rGwgtpWe3wNMlgTnSGj4emutJ0QTspPuNfJPyY1H4VAHbT4ILXbNEQqw Sgt5j2Pw91i6yBXLn53h85lrA3COMgwpuCHFeZUj3w3o5S9zaXcQzOd+T6FnC7MDjG bc+yzk3kwIoailEuakA0wMAevL3/IcfQYSAtJbAd3Pb0Fy58olz06SBh5SeTMSH3K2 bbjJv/kBb1GfQ== Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 11:03:03 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jiayuan Chen Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , Eduard Zingerman , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Jiri Olsa , John Fastabend , Stanislav Fomichev , Jamal Hadi Salim , Jiri Pirko , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] net/sched: cls_bpf: prevent unbounded recursion in offload rollback Message-ID: <20260525110303.4121f19b@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260522025854.341647-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> References: <20260522025854.341647-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 22 May 2026 10:58:53 +0800 Jiayuan Chen wrote: > - if (prog && err) { > - cls_bpf_offload_cmd(tp, oldprog, prog, extack); > + if (prog && err && !is_rollback) { > + cls_bpf_offload_cmd(tp, oldprog, prog, extack, true); > return err; > } Doesn't matter in practice but for code clarity we should only gate the call to cls_bpf_offload_cmd() not the entire error path. With that: Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski I'd take this via -next.