From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65EB521770B; Wed, 27 May 2026 02:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779847256; cv=none; b=ddz5O1tWIJ2qKnb/W1dltdy+XGG6yBcQBinZ1h9bwv9sq/B2CuEZT3PdTyF/jxaz84OUhc2WJ1GVUxxYAv8EOBKUWIrbeaThvL09Aba53zezqbN8Gg4iGR4Lngk83e1czuxa8EIBfPFrOW0Nfd0b5ofwQ9MzXocWQlHn9XxADOA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779847256; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fNPGm87JYOuRysvIxk0i4QUnV04al7jKYQRCCdmn7KM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lRPCPN7PCuXTT8Vaomnc/YbS+zDLrnYBsZpI4Y6SPZJBUW/R8hsOWobexL0WyGABpxg5su9sspuvsE61+d8Ez8k5pzX0wb7u+s5RoKFvupEIdgg/07b9cenYeOegOpKTfIA64551mMn6bxVY4NCv1xqO7RlPR+rk5gg3R+btX+Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=hv0wbfZg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hv0wbfZg" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AAD271F000E9; Wed, 27 May 2026 02:00:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779847255; bh=fNPGm87JYOuRysvIxk0i4QUnV04al7jKYQRCCdmn7KM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=hv0wbfZgcl3743R5rr04LdFIlxkL+ZJLkSpK8SLXFjsBWn+mgz0CgXSoBK/0FPbzc ASY2oS++EsJhUzr0pNhaD6MiYHOMNko1AbmTJXUWxgJdxEE160ifTr/fggRonsMaNq e8BsUM2u3VyNrKTQ2MdqkNm2FthzQXNhhQIqRseCuJQtYGk8PCpiviAo5CoKdQR92q IxEf+PsiSk8enj0hBOwa2KyawPzV79EODeJaRB0YZw05PmOE1+93od8OFy2El1crpW tCVTSrC8A2gXaN4oYBFjGd6qOk2AUd81wItxEYUDVJVDRWcdbbonDDzhmikUOYYHju xDO8N+PWRQuZw== Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 19:00:53 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Breno Leitao Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Andrew Lunn , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gustavold@gmail.com, asantostc@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] netconsole: stop charging every netpoll user for netconsole-only state Message-ID: <20260526190053.619cc53d@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260524-netconsole_move_more-v1-0-909d1ab398b4@debian.org> References: <20260524-netconsole_move_more-v1-0-909d1ab398b4@debian.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 24 May 2026 09:12:16 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote: > struct netpoll is shared by every netpoll consumer in the tree: > bonding, bridge, team, vlan, macvlan, dsa and netconsole. The non- > netconsole users only need a per-port handle that lets them transmit > SKBs. Are any of the Sashiko reports real? At least one seems legit (parallel device and target removal). If yes we should probably try to fix them before we shuffle the code around?