From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Omid Ehtemam-Haghighi <omid.ehtemamhaghighi@menlosecurity.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 1/2] ipv6: fix possible infinite loop in rt6_fill_node()
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 13:31:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260527053133.180695-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev> (raw)
Sashiko reported this issue [1]. Apply the same fix as
commit f8d8ce1b515a ("ipv6: fix possible infinite loop in fib6_info_uses_dev()").
Writers holding tb6_lock can list_del_rcu(&rt->fib6_siblings)
without waiting for RCU readers; rt->fib6_siblings.next then still
points into the old ring and this softirq-side walker never reaches
&rt->fib6_siblings, causing a CPU stall. fib6_purge_rt() always
WRITE_ONCE()s rt->fib6_nsiblings to 0 before list_del_rcu(), so an
inside-loop check is a reliable detach signal.
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260526020227.4857-1-jiayuan.chen%40linux.dev
Fixes: d9ccb18f83ea ("ipv6: Fix soft lockups in fib6_select_path under high next hop churn")
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
---
net/ipv6/route.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index b106e5fef9cb..dad416fdc585 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -5902,6 +5902,8 @@ static int rt6_fill_node(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
goto nla_put_failure;
}
+ if (!READ_ONCE(rt->fib6_nsiblings))
+ break;
}
rcu_read_unlock();
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-05-27 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-27 5:31 Jiayuan Chen [this message]
2026-05-27 5:31 ` [PATCH net 2/2] ipv6: fix possible infinite loop in fib6_select_path() Jiayuan Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260527053133.180695-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--to=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=omid.ehtemamhaghighi@menlosecurity.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox