Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux.dev
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	edumazet@google.com, razor@blackwall.org, horms@kernel.org,
	sdf@fomichev.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/3] selftests: rtnetlink: Add bridge promiscuity tests
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 11:25:14 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260527082514.GA443143@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260526064818.272516-4-idosch@nvidia.com>

On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 09:48:18AM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> +# Test that changing bridge port flags via the netlink path does not sleep with
> +# the bridge spin lock held.
> +kci_test_bridge_promisc_netlink()
> +{
> +	local dummy="test_dummy1"
> +	local bridge="test_br1"
> +	local team="test_team1"
> +	local ret=0
> +
> +	run_cmd ip link add $team up type team
> +	run_cmd ip link add $bridge up type bridge vlan_filtering 1
> +	run_cmd ip link add $dummy up type dummy
> +	run_cmd ip link set $dummy master $bridge
> +	run_cmd ip link set $team master $bridge
> +
> +	# This causes the bridge driver to sync all the static FDB entries to
> +	# the team device (which supports unicast filtering) and remove it from
> +	# promiscuous mode. The call to dev_set_promiscuity() can sleep due to
> +	# Rx mode inlining, which is a problem if the bridge spin lock is held.
> +	run_cmd bridge link set dev $dummy flood off learning off
> +
> +	run_cmd ip link del $dummy
> +	run_cmd ip link del $bridge
> +	run_cmd ip link del $team
> +
> +	end_test "PASS: bridge_promisc_netlink"
> +}

Both Sashikos complain about this passing even we failed to create the
team device ("for example with CONFIG_NET_TEAM=n or an iproute2 build
without team support").

We have CONFIG_NET_TEAM=y in tools/testing/selftests/net/config and we
can't assume we are running with ancient iproute2.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-27  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-26  6:48 [PATCH net 0/3] bridge: Fix sleep in atomic context Ido Schimmel
2026-05-26  6:48 ` [PATCH net 1/3] bridge: Fix sleep in atomic context in netlink path Ido Schimmel
2026-05-26  6:48 ` [PATCH net 2/3] bridge: Fix sleep in atomic context in sysfs path Ido Schimmel
2026-05-26  6:48 ` [PATCH net 3/3] selftests: rtnetlink: Add bridge promiscuity tests Ido Schimmel
2026-05-27  8:25   ` Ido Schimmel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260527082514.GA443143@shredder \
    --to=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox