Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] Revert "vsock/virtio: fix skb overhead overflow on 32-bit builds"
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 12:49:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260527124929-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260527164843.125054-1-sgarzare@redhat.com>

On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 06:48:43PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> 
> This reverts commit 4157501b9a8f ("vsock/virtio: fix skb overhead
> overflow on 32-bit builds"). The fix was semantically correct (although
> it would have been better to use mul_u32_u32(), as David pointed out),
> but in practice we are estimating the memory used to allocate the SKBs,
> and this will never cause a 32-bit variable to overflow on a 32-bit
> system, since the memory would have run out long before that. On 64-bit,
> SKB_TRUESIZE() already evaluates to size_t, so the multiplication is
> already in 64-bit arithmetic without the cast.
> 
> Let's revert this to avoid unnecessary 64-bit multiplies on the
> per-packet receive path on 32-bit systems.
> 
> Reported-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260523173557.5cc4f4f6@pumpkin
> Suggested-by: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

> ---
>  net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> index b143290a311d..d4d26fba9e37 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> @@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
>  static bool virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs,
>  					u32 len)
>  {
> -	u64 skb_overhead = ((u64)skb_queue_len(&vvs->rx_queue) + 1) * SKB_TRUESIZE(0);
> +	u64 skb_overhead = (skb_queue_len(&vvs->rx_queue) + 1) * SKB_TRUESIZE(0);
>  
>  	/* Allow at most buf_alloc * 2 total budget (payload + overhead),
>  	 * similar to how SO_RCVBUF is doubled to reserve space for sk_buff
> -- 
> 2.54.0


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-27 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-27 16:48 [PATCH net] Revert "vsock/virtio: fix skb overhead overflow on 32-bit builds" Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-27 16:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2026-05-27 16:54 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-27 16:56   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-27 17:00     ` Stefano Garzarella

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260527124929-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox