From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FD9464; Thu, 28 May 2026 00:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779926690; cv=none; b=Va97kZLACJJRhtsTB3ApnDHjuKHTzpXxnOVMW5mdc5ZbAnh+sk0QE8SHATBhlc8eQS9vHQndZtRat1A2Kgci+Wv2KEYu2IGPZdQRg/snykRL28MQCZ/2CRMneTdH5AJj2i8fTE2k+9oyhuDOQgg528o0qZQBNlOEqbmjMBABjjY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779926690; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Y8dPkvHH0k3eqI68OzvyDzuVRrQ/6R6WKZwxFloxU7k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Hs+GFjrLhXo/8yZTm9GOhPXKvgpK6tKDi6uPSUkePvR+RC1vYvWuDetNfg360CCLj2lFOxgIMbrIKwFanzabRl2I63vhWY1jpwSxXkd6sV7iDRlWrULwMd2+LW0JFVckIZ5NG4nFrxmd1AfR7xYHPw5EPy5Ba524rAqg+z3l9y0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=i9ws8vPx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="i9ws8vPx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBCB41F000E9; Thu, 28 May 2026 00:04:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1779926689; bh=KpNzEK8ilcsreYFLZ0HInY53a42KARK8PPrBKd+7WlA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=i9ws8vPxNZsQMuIdLNwEsw17ATOgrueS1Xbd6EVtg64N3IohZUl4ACh6twy70BLcw 4IzWyVABbVvjBHOndjUiimveo2vIb4L+JJaOzYj/Er0s40OkX/6JfF5EpAtILqbOCF 5n0JN0LlG74Xo5cRQ/TQhOn40IUNmkOTvjr59BjXhXGbSML/5yNos+mPuiaHfIDCQO T/+dW713J9w84aZRltnp+LGyjfY8cgWJpLFSUWo+Gt8RPY2fhh/IGGuDcJMwHmc3Yd sl+GYiLXKz0WGQx7f6rKzrweH+xbAw2+VvUA9u40bGr+BaclHXz+n1LyWICr9BCI+L USvlJIXrTuiAg== Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 17:04:48 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Hungyu Lin Cc: subash.a.kasiviswanathan@oss.qualcomm.com, sean.tranchetti@oss.qualcomm.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: qualcomm: rmnet: clarify MAP command ACK behavior Message-ID: <20260527170448.350f1c2d@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260523110346.1672-1-dennylin0707@gmail.com> References: <20260523110346.1672-1-dennylin0707@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 23 May 2026 11:03:46 +0000 Hungyu Lin wrote: > rmnet_map_command() only sends ACK responses for supported > commands. Unsupported commands are dropped without sending > a response. To me the words "as appropriate" express the fact that the ack is not always sent sufficiently. This seems like pointless churn. -- pw-bot: reject