From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: "MOESSBAUER, Felix" <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>
Cc: "intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Behera, VIVEK" <vivek.behera@siemens.com>,
"Ertman, David M" <david.m.ertman@intel.com>,
Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@intel.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] igb: Return state in pm_runtime_idle instead of power-down
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 11:09:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260528100912.GQ2256768@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c72678bab1eeca51b7f849a6f85999995b646f3.camel@siemens.com>
On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 07:53:53AM +0000, MOESSBAUER, Felix wrote:
> On Fri, 2026-05-08 at 10:56 +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> > + David Ertman, Sasha Neftin, Heiner Kallweit
> >
> > On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 12:11:34PM +0200, Felix Moessbauer wrote:
> > > The PM runtime_idle API expects to get an indication if the device can
> > > be powered down. Instead of returning the appropriate state, we
> > > currently directly power down the device (if not active) and return
> > > that the device is busy.
> > >
> > > We change this by making the function side-effect free and just return
> > > the state.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 749ab2cd12704 ("igb: add basic runtime PM support")
> > > Signed-off-by: Felix Moessbauer <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> > > index ce91dda00ec0e..e8ab0b506a104 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> > > @@ -9652,7 +9652,7 @@ static int igb_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
> > > struct igb_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > >
> > > if (!igb_has_link(adapter))
> > > - pm_schedule_suspend(dev, MSEC_PER_SEC * 5);
> > > + return 0;
> > >
> > > return -EBUSY;
> > > }
> >
> > Hi Felix,
> >
> > I am not sure this is the right approach, are you seeing a behavioural
> > problem?
>
> I don't see a behavioral issue, but a clear API violation. That's why I
> also added a fixes tag.
>
> >
> >
> > This pattern seems to also be present in at least e1000e, igc and r8169.
> >
> > The igb and e1000e implementations seem to have co-evolved [1][2],
> > possibly in conjunction with OOT versions of each driver.
> > The igc implementation came later, perhaps copying e1000e or igb [3].
>
> I'm fine with also changing the other drivers, however I'm not able to
> test these (except for e1000e).
>
> >
> > The git log for r8169 seems to provide a justification for why that
> > driver users this approach [4].
> >
> > - Let the idle notification check whether we can suspend and let it
> > schedule the suspend. This way we don't need to have calls to
> > pm_schedule_suspend in different places.
>
> To me it still is a bit vague, why it was implemented like that. By
> implementing it as done prior to my change, we have pm_schedule_suspend
> in multiple places (along with a hard-coded delay of 5 secs).
>
> >
> > While the current e1000e implementation seems to address some reliability
> > issues [1], although it's not entirely clear to me how that relates to the
> > issue at hand.
>
> I don't think that this relates, but I also found the igb_runtime_idle
> inconsistency while debugging why setting the mac addr on an igb nic
> without cable attached (no carrier) fails on some systems.
>
> IOW: What I propose here is a drive-by fix based on me reading the code
> and the PM API.
Thanks,
I understand your position wrt API violation. But given the history of this
code, both in igb and other Intel drivers, I think we need some insight
from people familiar with this code regarding what is going on here.
>
> Best regards,
> Felix
>
> >
> > Fix issues with:
> > RuntimePM causing the device to repeatedly flip between suspend and resume
> > with the interface administratively downed.
> > Having RuntimePM enabled interfering with the functionality of Energy
> > Efficient Ethernet.
> >
> > Added checks to disallow functions that should not be executed if the
> > device is currently runtime suspended
> >
> > Make runtime_idle callback to use same deterministic behavior as the igb
> > driver.
> >
> > [1] 63eb48f151b5 ("e1000e Refactor of Runtime Power Management")
> > Fri Feb 14 07:16:46 2014 +0000
> > [2] 749ab2cd1270 ("igb: add basic runtime PM support")
> > Wed Jan 4 20:23:37 2012 +0000
> > [3] 9513d2a5dc7f ("igc: Add legacy power management support")
> > Thu Nov 14 09:54:46 2019 +020
> > [4] a92a08499b1f ("r8169: improve runtime pm in general and suspend unused ports")
> > Mon Jan 8 21:39:13 2018 +0100
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-28 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-05 10:11 [PATCH net 1/1] igb: Return state in pm_runtime_idle instead of power-down Felix Moessbauer
2026-05-08 9:56 ` Simon Horman
2026-05-26 7:53 ` MOESSBAUER, Felix
2026-05-28 10:09 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260528100912.GQ2256768@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.m.ertman@intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=felix.moessbauer@siemens.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=sasha.neftin@intel.com \
--cc=vivek.behera@siemens.com \
--cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox