From: Qi Tang <tpluszz77@gmail.com>
To: jiayuan.chen@linux.dev
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org,
idosch@nvidia.com, horms@kernel.org, lyutoon@gmail.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Qi Tang <tpluszz77@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv4: validate ip_forward_options() option fields against skb tail
Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 00:32:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260528163226.573363-1-tpluszz77@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b1447f76-0ca4-49b1-a1ba-2670dbbe5eea@linux.dev>
On 5/28/26 9:48 PM, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> The bug is real, but I'm curious what kernel version and driver you're on.
> On my side the skb falls into SKB_SMALL_HEAD_CACHE_SIZE (704), so the
> linear area is pretty long, and optptr[2] maxes out at 255, which doesn't
> look like it can reach frag_list.
>
> May the driver use alloc_skb to allocate small liner buffer?
net.git at e1914add2799 (7.1-rc3), x86_64 + KASAN, plain QEMU, no special
driver. You're right that with a normal small nh_off the +250 write stays in
the linear area. We get the reach from a large nh_off instead.
The packet is forwarded over a VXLAN-over-IPv6 tunnel, so after decap the
inner IP packet still has the outer eth/IPv6/UDP/VXLAN/inner-eth in front of
it in the same head (nh_off ~112 here). Inner options are 12 NOPs + RR, so
opt->rr = 32, and nft rewrites the RR pointer byte to 0xff on the forward
hook:
nft add rule ip filter forward @nh,272,8 set 0xff
so ip_forward_options() does
write = head + nh_off + opt->rr + (0xff - 5)
= head + 112 + 32 + 250 = head + 394
with end = 384 that lands at shinfo+10, inside frag_list. ip_rt_get_source()
writes the route source there, and kfree_skb_list_reason() walks the corrupted
frag_list when the skb is dropped.
VXLAN was just convenient. Other paths likely work too: any encap that pushes
the options deeper, or a smaller head like you suggested. Pre-6.3 without
skb_small_head_cache a plain forwarded packet already has end=192. I can send
the PoC off-list if you want to repro.
Thanks,
Qi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-28 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 11:12 [PATCH net] ipv4: validate ip_forward_options() option fields against skb tail Qi Tang
2026-05-28 13:48 ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-05-28 16:32 ` Qi Tang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260528163226.573363-1-tpluszz77@gmail.com \
--to=tpluszz77@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lyutoon@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox