From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 058603446DE; Fri, 29 May 2026 09:34:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780047296; cv=none; b=axF7fLTEn3QKaYSVcpJfvH5fcoLyclG2hXwpSsaL7tm2wDT6o/qyrDJGF/ZHyvM87vM9Rq2VJSf+1IUnf+mYEDe5nqgkk7f5zyRNhQGQnQ3NvmmVQB7lGoPb65eb213O5QCLIuMHsLrWnGwSq9BKPfOa9troBGKpNCIQzYV+OD0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780047296; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4fNw6ghQiLfMpseVSQY5c76rnKVPZ/fhYgyKqPsIlyo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=b0QWnhY4hmzfXFObintVBZ9PdX6/fd42Mm39mqSeN6nfDd/gbX23zqteyrzJEKngtzcPBbMw3iQ/ZCbEF2KvMvbzBUAlw2HCSQCJvbW0npQtxwPHi8nT0xV6oDnAcHOho6pngmEN0kS3A8HYrEy/n7nm0fgXpN6hUWUcqiA6qLA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=AYmxpyPM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="AYmxpyPM" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 143B01F00893; Fri, 29 May 2026 09:34:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1780047293; bh=AK8ANNkExqOCITqWBHg+9jotgKMJByIVfhp0S8C+FEE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=AYmxpyPM8hKkZHTLfPs7uwwpSLfKH0JWQUgbZrT0aAn7zzM2SV8xAMv6STs8uuL/2 uDjTW7RJ1YoPLRpSfhcP0P/JGYlmNyrhwbs4U4Y+bSbpjb5KcD+cOyaRcGLeXpRkYN tjrBU6jLg14yOHU0KMS7cngHQBtrwvbr41pYcoF5tF3uck6gtidjoR8vx0HX78N0NT viKhX9OerJUouMX3w0CE7Wi8X0PRzsLG1OgwO84oQO5R31hCpqqpN0wBZayLYSZZHX vWYmO1kY/dLOCg0c+bIbTIxCcYcW2nHWI6Jjiy+Yonin+twrefMV7uCP/1/j2Zae6a Pwa/ZRtDZxtlg== Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 10:34:48 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Jijie Shao Cc: Paolo Abeni , davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, shenjian15@huawei.com, liuyonglong@huawei.com, chenhao418@huawei.com, huangdonghua3@h-partners.com, yangshuaisong@h-partners.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 0/6] net: hns3: enhance tc flow offload support Message-ID: <20260529093448.GV2256768@horms.kernel.org> References: <20260523105449.661848-1-shaojijie@huawei.com> <20260527095930.GI2256768@horms.kernel.org> <83f34836-c848-469a-9c1c-7f28bf3035fc@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83f34836-c848-469a-9c1c-7f28bf3035fc@huawei.com> On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 07:24:28PM +0800, Jijie Shao wrote: > > on 2026/5/28 17:06, Paolo Abeni wrote: > > On 5/27/26 3:12 PM, Jijie Shao wrote: > > > on 2026/5/27 17:59, Simon Horman wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 23, 2026 at 06:54:43PM +0800, Jijie Shao wrote: ... > > > > Hi Juijie, > > > > > > > > There are AI-generated reviews of this patch-set available at > > > > https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ and https://sashiko.dev/ > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm sorry, I don't understand how to use https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/, it seems to require an API Token? > > > I find it difficult to locate my own patch-set in Recent Reviews. > > The nipa sashiko instance has the same web UI as sashiko.dev. The full > > URL for the former is: > > > > https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/ > > > > You can lookup your series by the cover letter title or you can use the > > direct link including the msg id for the cover: > > > > https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260523105449.661848-1-shaojijie%40huawei.com > > Thanks, > > It appears that the two URLs mentioned by Simon Horman are the results of the one AI-generated reviews. Hi, Firstly sorry for truncating the netdev-ai URL, that was not my intention. Secondly, let me explain the relationship between the AI-generated review on netdev-ai and sashiko.dev. Both use the same underlying review engine - Sashiko [1]. But they are using different AI models to run the review. And I believe that the prompts also differ a little. Overall, netdev-ai, has been tuned for the Netdev review process. While sashiko.dev is more general. My observation is that netdev-ai tends to flag things relevant to the Netdev development process that may be skipped by sashiko.dev. While sashiko.dev has a tendency to report pre-existing issues that are not strictly related to the topic of the patch under review. But, as the underling engine is the same there is also a lot of overlap in the output produced by these two instances. And in some cases both instances flag all of the same issues. [1] https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko