From: Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net: pse-pd: disable IRQ before freeing PI data in unregister
Date: Sat, 30 May 2026 12:50:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260530105031.3274303-1-github@szelinsky.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260527125551.2425511-3-horms@kernel.org>
Hi Simon,
Thanks for the review.
> pse_flush_pw_ds() runs before disable_irq(), so an interrupt could
> hit a freed regulator.
Correct, and it's the same bug. I moved disable_irq() above
pse_release_pis(), but pse_flush_pw_ds() still runs while the IRQ is
live, and it can free pw_d->supply. The ISR uses that supply via
pse_pi_deallocate_pw_budget(). So the race stays open.
Fix: disable the IRQ (and cancel the poll work) before
pse_flush_pw_ds() too. I'll fold that into patch 1 for v2.
> cancel_work_sync() after pse_release_pis() may use freed pcdev->pi.
I don't think so. The worker only touches the kfifo and the
pse_control list, not pcdev->pi. The patch 1 message says this.
Did I miss a path where the worker reaches pcdev->pi?
> Regulator ops still reachable after pcdev->pi is freed.
That is what patch 2 fixes for the disable path. Are you pointing at
a different path than the regulator_unregister() disable flush?
> device still in the list / external consumers / power domain tied to
> devm lifetime.
These look pre-existing and not part of this series. Do you agree, or
do you see one of them as caused by this series?
The pre-existing items above (list, consumers, devm lifetime) - would
you want them fixed inside this net series, or handled separately on
top? So I know what to do before sending v2.
Thanks,
Carlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-30 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-24 22:33 [PATCH net 0/2] net: pse-pd: fix use-after-free of PI array on controller teardown Carlo Szelinsky
2026-05-24 22:33 ` [PATCH net 1/2] net: pse-pd: disable IRQ before freeing PI data in unregister Carlo Szelinsky
2026-05-27 12:55 ` Simon Horman
2026-05-30 10:50 ` Carlo Szelinsky [this message]
2026-05-24 22:33 ` [PATCH net 2/2] net: pse-pd: guard against freed PI data on regulator disable Carlo Szelinsky
2026-05-27 12:24 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260530105031.3274303-1-github@szelinsky.de \
--to=github@szelinsky.de \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox