Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harshitha Ramamurthy <hramamurthy@google.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: joshwash@google.com, hramamurthy@google.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,  davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,  ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org,  john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	sdf@fomichev.me, willemb@google.com,  jordanrhee@google.com,
	jfraker@google.com, nktgrg@google.com,  bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 11/15] gve: split up notify block allocation and setup paths
Date: Mon,  1 Jun 2026 17:54:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260601175437.3767283-12-hramamurthy@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260601175437.3767283-1-hramamurthy@google.com>

From: Joshua Washington <joshwash@google.com>

Before this patch, notify block allocation and setup occurred in the same
method. This all occurred before gve_adminq_configure_device_resources,
which populates the irq_db_indicies array, a DMA region with BAR offsets
for MSI-X vectors.

The coming mailbox mode will require notify blocks to be set up only
after receiving the IRQ doorbell offsets, as the request does not work
with a supplied DMA buffer in the way that admin queue mode does. The
intended flow in that case would be:

1) allocate notify blocks
2) request doorbell information
3) set up MSI-X vectors based on doorbell info

This ordering also works for admin queue mode, so it will be updated to
match.

Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Rhee <jordanrhee@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Joshua Washington <joshwash@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Harshitha Ramamurthy <hramamurthy@google.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve.h      |   2 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_main.c | 158 ++++++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve.h
index f8976017ca60..12591a1fd746 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve.h
@@ -673,6 +673,7 @@ struct gve_notify_block {
 	struct gve_tx_ring *tx; /* tx rings on this block */
 	struct gve_rx_ring *rx; /* rx rings on this block */
 	u32 irq;
+	bool irq_requested;
 };
 
 /* Tracks allowed and current rx queue settings */
@@ -964,6 +965,7 @@ struct gve_priv {
 	u64 link_speed;
 	bool up_before_suspend; /* True if dev was up before suspend */
 
+	bool mgmt_irq_requested;
 	struct gve_ptype_lut *ptype_lut_dqo;
 
 	/* Must be a power of two. */
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_main.c
index 06df6d8ad429..98970508ae54 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_main.c
@@ -425,6 +425,24 @@ int gve_napi_poll_dqo(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 	return work_done;
 }
 
+static void gve_free_notify_blocks(struct gve_priv *priv)
+{
+	pci_disable_msix(priv->pdev);
+	if (priv->irq_db_indices) {
+		dma_free_coherent(&priv->pdev->dev,
+				  priv->num_ntfy_blks *
+				  sizeof(*priv->irq_db_indices),
+				  priv->irq_db_indices,
+				  priv->irq_db_indices_bus);
+		priv->irq_db_indices = NULL;
+	}
+
+	kvfree(priv->ntfy_blocks);
+	priv->ntfy_blocks = NULL;
+	kvfree(priv->msix_vectors);
+	priv->msix_vectors = NULL;
+}
+
 static const struct cpumask *gve_get_node_mask(struct gve_priv *priv)
 {
 	if (priv->numa_node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
@@ -436,11 +454,9 @@ static const struct cpumask *gve_get_node_mask(struct gve_priv *priv)
 static int gve_alloc_notify_blocks(struct gve_priv *priv)
 {
 	int num_vecs_requested = priv->num_ntfy_blks + 1;
-	const struct cpumask *node_mask;
-	unsigned int cur_cpu;
 	int vecs_enabled;
-	int i, j;
 	int err;
+	int i;
 
 	priv->msix_vectors = kvzalloc_objs(*priv->msix_vectors,
 					   num_vecs_requested);
@@ -454,7 +470,7 @@ static int gve_alloc_notify_blocks(struct gve_priv *priv)
 		dev_err(&priv->pdev->dev, "Could not enable min msix %d/%d\n",
 			GVE_MIN_MSIX, vecs_enabled);
 		err = vecs_enabled;
-		goto abort_with_msix_vectors;
+		goto abort;
 	}
 	if (vecs_enabled != num_vecs_requested) {
 		int new_num_ntfy_blks = (vecs_enabled - 1) & ~0x1;
@@ -477,15 +493,6 @@ static int gve_alloc_notify_blocks(struct gve_priv *priv)
 			priv->rx_cfg.num_queues = priv->rx_cfg.max_queues;
 	}
 
-	/* Setup Management Vector  - the last vector */
-	snprintf(priv->mgmt_msix_name, sizeof(priv->mgmt_msix_name), "gve-mgmnt@pci:%s",
-		 pci_name(priv->pdev));
-	err = request_irq(priv->msix_vectors[priv->mgmt_msix_idx].vector,
-			  gve_mgmnt_intr, 0, priv->mgmt_msix_name, priv);
-	if (err) {
-		dev_err(&priv->pdev->dev, "Did not receive management vector.\n");
-		goto abort_with_msix_enabled;
-	}
 	priv->irq_db_indices =
 		dma_alloc_coherent(&priv->pdev->dev,
 				   priv->num_ntfy_blks *
@@ -493,15 +500,65 @@ static int gve_alloc_notify_blocks(struct gve_priv *priv)
 				   &priv->irq_db_indices_bus, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!priv->irq_db_indices) {
 		err = -ENOMEM;
-		goto abort_with_mgmt_vector;
+		goto abort;
 	}
 
 	priv->ntfy_blocks = kvzalloc(priv->num_ntfy_blks *
 				     sizeof(*priv->ntfy_blocks), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!priv->ntfy_blocks) {
 		err = -ENOMEM;
-		goto abort_with_irq_db_indices;
+		goto abort;
+	}
+	return 0;
+
+abort:
+	gve_free_notify_blocks(priv);
+	return err;
+}
+
+static void gve_teardown_notify_blocks(struct gve_priv *priv)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	if (!priv->ntfy_blocks)
+		return;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < priv->num_ntfy_blks; i++) {
+		struct gve_notify_block *block = &priv->ntfy_blocks[i];
+
+		if (!block->irq_requested)
+			continue;
+
+		irq_set_affinity_hint(priv->msix_vectors[i].vector,
+				      NULL);
+		free_irq(priv->msix_vectors[i].vector, block);
+		block->irq = 0;
+		block->irq_requested = false;
+	}
+
+	if (priv->mgmt_irq_requested) {
+		free_irq(priv->msix_vectors[priv->mgmt_msix_idx].vector, priv);
+		priv->mgmt_irq_requested = false;
+	}
+}
+
+static int gve_setup_notify_blocks(struct gve_priv *priv)
+{
+	const struct cpumask *node_mask;
+	unsigned int cur_cpu;
+	int i;
+	int err;
+
+	/* Setup Management Vector  - the last vector */
+	snprintf(priv->mgmt_msix_name, sizeof(priv->mgmt_msix_name),
+		 "gve-mgmnt@pci:%s", pci_name(priv->pdev));
+	err = request_irq(priv->msix_vectors[priv->mgmt_msix_idx].vector,
+			  gve_mgmnt_intr, 0, priv->mgmt_msix_name, priv);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_err(&priv->pdev->dev, "Did not receive management vector.\n");
+		return err;
 	}
+	priv->mgmt_irq_requested = true;
 
 	/* Setup the other blocks - the first n-1 vectors */
 	node_mask = gve_get_node_mask(priv);
@@ -519,9 +576,10 @@ static int gve_alloc_notify_blocks(struct gve_priv *priv)
 		if (err) {
 			dev_err(&priv->pdev->dev,
 				"Failed to receive msix vector %d\n", i);
-			goto abort_with_some_ntfy_blocks;
+			goto abort;
 		}
 		block->irq = priv->msix_vectors[msix_idx].vector;
+		block->irq_requested = true;
 		irq_set_affinity_and_hint(block->irq,
 					  cpumask_of(cur_cpu));
 		block->irq_db_index = &priv->irq_db_indices[i].index;
@@ -535,61 +593,12 @@ static int gve_alloc_notify_blocks(struct gve_priv *priv)
 			cur_cpu = cpumask_first(node_mask);
 	}
 	return 0;
-abort_with_some_ntfy_blocks:
-	for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
-		struct gve_notify_block *block = &priv->ntfy_blocks[j];
-		int msix_idx = j;
 
-		irq_set_affinity_hint(priv->msix_vectors[msix_idx].vector,
-				      NULL);
-		free_irq(priv->msix_vectors[msix_idx].vector, block);
-		block->irq = 0;
-	}
-	kvfree(priv->ntfy_blocks);
-	priv->ntfy_blocks = NULL;
-abort_with_irq_db_indices:
-	dma_free_coherent(&priv->pdev->dev, priv->num_ntfy_blks *
-			  sizeof(*priv->irq_db_indices),
-			  priv->irq_db_indices, priv->irq_db_indices_bus);
-	priv->irq_db_indices = NULL;
-abort_with_mgmt_vector:
-	free_irq(priv->msix_vectors[priv->mgmt_msix_idx].vector, priv);
-abort_with_msix_enabled:
-	pci_disable_msix(priv->pdev);
-abort_with_msix_vectors:
-	kvfree(priv->msix_vectors);
-	priv->msix_vectors = NULL;
+abort:
+	gve_teardown_notify_blocks(priv);
 	return err;
 }
 
-static void gve_free_notify_blocks(struct gve_priv *priv)
-{
-	int i;
-
-	if (!priv->msix_vectors)
-		return;
-
-	/* Free the irqs */
-	for (i = 0; i < priv->num_ntfy_blks; i++) {
-		struct gve_notify_block *block = &priv->ntfy_blocks[i];
-		int msix_idx = i;
-
-		irq_set_affinity_hint(priv->msix_vectors[msix_idx].vector,
-				      NULL);
-		free_irq(priv->msix_vectors[msix_idx].vector, block);
-		block->irq = 0;
-	}
-	free_irq(priv->msix_vectors[priv->mgmt_msix_idx].vector, priv);
-	kvfree(priv->ntfy_blocks);
-	priv->ntfy_blocks = NULL;
-	dma_free_coherent(&priv->pdev->dev, priv->num_ntfy_blks *
-			  sizeof(*priv->irq_db_indices),
-			  priv->irq_db_indices, priv->irq_db_indices_bus);
-	priv->irq_db_indices = NULL;
-	pci_disable_msix(priv->pdev);
-	kvfree(priv->msix_vectors);
-	priv->msix_vectors = NULL;
-}
 
 static void gve_free_control_plane_resources(struct gve_priv *priv)
 {
@@ -743,6 +752,7 @@ static void gve_teardown_control_plane_resources(struct gve_priv *priv)
 
 static void gve_teardown_device(struct gve_priv *priv)
 {
+	gve_teardown_notify_blocks(priv);
 	gve_teardown_control_plane_resources(priv);
 	gve_adminq_free(priv);
 	/*
@@ -2463,13 +2473,16 @@ static int gve_setup_device(struct gve_priv *priv)
 
 	err = gve_alloc_control_plane_resources(priv);
 	if (err)
-		goto err;
+		return err;
+
 	err = gve_setup_control_plane_resources(priv);
 	if (err)
-		goto err;
+		return err;
+
+	err = gve_setup_notify_blocks(priv);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 	return 0;
-err:
-	return err;
 }
 
 static const struct gve_ctrl_ops gve_adminq_ops = {
@@ -2591,6 +2604,9 @@ int gve_reset(struct gve_priv *priv, bool skip_queue_setup)
 		gve_unregister_qpls(priv);
 	}
 
+	gve_teardown_notify_blocks(priv);
+	gve_teardown_control_plane_resources(priv);
+
 	/* Reset the device by releasing the AQ. Rings and other resources
 	 * within the NIC are implicitly destroyed if commands fail.
 	 */
-- 
2.54.0.669.g59709faab0-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-01 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-01 17:54 [PATCH net-next 00/15] gve: AdminQ mode related refactors Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-06-01 17:54 ` [PATCH net-next 01/15] gve: don't pass in unused parameter to gve_adminq_free Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-06-01 17:54 ` [PATCH net-next 02/15] gve: refactor initialization with helper functions Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-06-01 17:54 ` [PATCH net-next 03/15] gve: introduce gve_adminq_get_device_properties() Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-06-01 17:54 ` [PATCH net-next 04/15] gve: add a few helper functions to set device properties Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-06-01 17:54 ` [PATCH net-next 05/15] gve: add struct gve_device_info to hold " Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-06-01 17:54 ` [PATCH net-next 06/15] gve: introduce control plane operations structure Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-06-01 17:54 ` [PATCH net-next 07/15] gve: introduce ctrl ops to set vectors and Qs Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-06-01 17:54 ` [PATCH net-next 08/15] gve: refactor gve_init_priv for reset path Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-06-01 17:54 ` [PATCH net-next 09/15] gve: simplify reset logic Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-06-01 17:54 ` [PATCH net-next 10/15] gve: add gve_ctrl_ops for gve initialization/teardown sequences Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-06-01 17:54 ` Harshitha Ramamurthy [this message]
2026-06-01 17:54 ` [PATCH net-next 12/15] gve: introduce new methods to handle IRQ doorbells Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-06-01 17:54 ` [PATCH net-next 13/15] gve: setup and teardown management interrupts Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-06-01 17:54 ` [PATCH net-next 14/15] gve: add ctrl ops to for queue operations Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-06-01 17:54 ` [PATCH net-next 15/15] gve: add link status/speed ctrl ops Harshitha Ramamurthy
2026-06-01 22:01 ` [PATCH net-next 00/15] gve: AdminQ mode related refactors Harshitha Ramamurthy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260601175437.3767283-12-hramamurthy@google.com \
    --to=hramamurthy@google.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jfraker@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jordanrhee@google.com \
    --cc=joshwash@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nktgrg@google.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox