Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: boz baba <bababoz943@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, steffen.klassert@secunet.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: esp4/esp6: missing skb_has_shared_frag() check in 6.1.y (CVE-2026-43284 backport)
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 16:48:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026060157-throbbing-antarctic-5e7a@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAB7JC+TiyF6-1uvzhOcJ9KeDUhNgLmXk8unHNogY156xSu61g@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 02:31:48PM +0300, boz baba wrote:
> Hi stable team,
> 
> The fix for CVE-2026-43284 ("Dirty Frag", commit f4c50a4034e6) added a
> skb_has_shared_frag() check to the skip_cow path in esp_input() in both
> net/ipv4/esp4.c and net/ipv6/esp6.c. This fix was backported to 6.12.y
> but appears to be missing from the 6.1.y stable branch.
> 
> Affected: linux-6.1.133 (latest 6.1.y as of 2026-05-31)

No, 6.1.133 was released on Mon Apr 7 10:05:54 2025 +0200, there have
been many many releases since then.

> Fixed in: linux-6.12.91, mainline (f4c50a4034e6)
> 
> Vulnerable pattern in net/ipv4/esp4.c (line 912) and net/ipv6/esp6.c (line 960):
> 
>   if (!skb_cloned(skb)) {
>       if (!skb_is_nonlinear(skb)) {
>           nfrags = 1;
>           goto skip_cow;
>       } else if (!skb_has_frag_list(skb)) {   /* <-- missing &&
> !skb_has_shared_frag(skb) */
>           nfrags = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
>           nfrags++;
>           goto skip_cow;
>       }
>   }
> 
> The missing check allows an skb with SKBFL_SHARED_FRAG set (e.g. from
> vmsplice()/sendfile()) to bypass skb_cow_data() and proceed to in-place
> aead decryption via:
> 
>   aead_request_set_crypt(req, sg, sg, elen + ivlen, iv);
>   crypto_aead_decrypt(req);
> 
> This is the same page-cache corruption primitive as CVE-2026-43284.
> 
> Please backport commit f4c50a4034e6 to linux-6.1.y.

It is already in the 6.1.171 release.

> Affected versions: linux-6.1.x (all versions, fix not present)
> Fixed versions: linux-6.12.91+, mainline
> 
> Verified by: source comparison of net/ipv4/esp4.c and net/ipv6/esp6.c
> between linux-6.1.133 and linux-6.12.91.

6.1.133 is very very old, please update your tree.

thanks,

greg k-h

      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-01 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-01 11:31 [PATCH] net: esp4/esp6: missing skb_has_shared_frag() check in 6.1.y (CVE-2026-43284 backport) boz baba
2026-06-01 14:48 ` Greg KH [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026060157-throbbing-antarctic-5e7a@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=bababoz943@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox