Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	horms@kernel.org, idosch@nvidia.com, jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn,
	kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: use READ_ONCE() in ipv6_flowlabel_get()
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 09:00:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260602090034.7a5c243e@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260601231546.3407019-1-kuniyu@google.com>

On Mon,  1 Jun 2026 23:14:44 +0000
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com> wrote:

> From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 22:31:22 +0100
> > On Mon, 1 Jun 2026 05:36:37 -0700
> > Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2026 at 5:22 AM David Laight
> > > <david.laight.linux@gmail.com> wrote:  
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 31 May 2026 23:39:46 +0800
> > > > Runyu Xiao <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn> wrote:
> > > >    
> > > > > ipv6_flowlabel_get() still reads the shared per-net sysctl fields
> > > > > flowlabel_consistency and flowlabel_state_ranges with plain loads,
> > > > > while writers update them through proc_dou8vec_minmax(). These checks
> > > > > run in the live IPV6_FLOWLABEL_MGR path, so lockless plain reads leave
> > > > > KCSAN-visible data races and can make the policy checks observe stale or
> > > > > inconsistent values.
> > > > >
> > > > > The race can be reached on a running system by toggling
> > > > > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/flowlabel_consistency and
> > > > > /proc/sys/net/ipv6/flowlabel_state_ranges while another task repeatedly
> > > > > issues IPV6_FLOWLABEL_MGR requests with IPV6_FL_F_REFLECT or a
> > > > > state-ranges flow label.
> > > > >
> > > > > This issue was first flagged by our static analysis tool while scanning
> > > > > lockless IPv6 sysctl readers, then manually audited on Linux v6.18.21.
> > > > > The IPV6_FLOWLABEL_MGR paths were runtime-reproduced with QEMU/KCSAN by
> > > > > concurrently flipping the two sysctls while TCP reflect and UDP
> > > > > state-ranges setsockopt actors exercised ipv6_flowlabel_get(). KCSAN
> > > > > reported races between proc_dou8vec_minmax() and the two plain-load
> > > > > sites in ipv6_flowlabel_get().
> > > > >
> > > > > A narrower second-round UDPv6 + IPV6_AUTOFLOWLABEL send-side reproducer
> > > > > also hit the inline ip6_make_flowlabel() reader through
> > > > > __ip6_make_skb() / proc_dou8vec_minmax(), but that site is already
> > > > > fixed in this tree by commit ded139b59b5d
> > > > > ("ipv6: annotate data-races from ip6_make_flowlabel()"). The remaining
> > > > > plain readers in this tree are both in ipv6_flowlabel_get().
> > > > >
> > > > > Use READ_ONCE() for those remaining sysctl reads so they follow the same
> > > > > lockless reader contract already used by other IPv6 sysctl readers.
> > > > >
> > > > > Build-tested by compiling net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.o on x86_64.
> > > > >
> > > > > Representative QEMU/KCSAN reports from the two target reader paths:
> > > > >
> > > > >   BUG: KCSAN: data-race in ipv6_flowlabel_opt / proc_dou8vec_minmax
> > > > >   write: proc_dou8vec_minmax+0x206/0x220
> > > > >   read:  ipv6_flowlabel_opt+0x6d8/0xd20
> > > > >          do_ipv6_setsockopt+0x873/0x2220
> > > > >          tcp_setsockopt+0x72/0xb0
> > > > >
> > > > >   BUG: KCSAN: data-race in ipv6_flowlabel_opt / proc_dou8vec_minmax
> > > > >   write: proc_dou8vec_minmax+0x206/0x220
> > > > >   read:  ipv6_flowlabel_opt+0x129/0xd20
> > > > >          do_ipv6_setsockopt+0x873/0x2220
> > > > >          udpv6_setsockopt+0x21/0x40
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 6444f72b4b74 ("ipv6: add flowlabel_consistency sysctl")
> > > > > Fixes: 82a584b7cd36 ("ipv6: Flow label state ranges")
> > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Runyu Xiao <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c | 4 ++--
> > > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >A
> > > > > diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
> > > > > index b1ccdf0dc646..1ab5ad0dcf24 100644
> > > > > --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
> > > > > +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
> > > > > @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ static int ipv6_flowlabel_get(struct sock *sk, struct in6_flowlabel_req *freq,
> > > > >       int err;
> > > > >
> > > > >       if (freq->flr_flags & IPV6_FL_F_REFLECT) {
> > > > > -             if (net->ipv6.sysctl.flowlabel_consistency) {
> > > > > +             if (READ_ONCE(net->ipv6.sysctl.flowlabel_consistency)) {    
> > > >
> > > > That can't actually fix anything.    
> > > 
> > > It fixes a KCSAN splat.
> > > 
> > > If you think you can fix KCSAN instead, please do so.

ipv6.h has:
	u8 flowlabel_consistency;

KCSAN probably shouldn't care about byte reads.

> > 
> > It is a false positive.  
> 
> It's not.
> 
> 
> > (Which I think you also said in a different email.  
> 
> I guess you meant this one ?
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260601074201.1186061-1-runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn/
> 
> This is different because, in addition to Eric's comment, IPv6
> address is 128-bit and data-race is inevitable without locking
> unless CPU supports native 128-bit read/write; we already do
> load/store-tearing of 128bit with u32/u64.

But the code isn't looking at a 128bit value, it is only doing a check
for zero (and READ_ONCE() doesn't support 128bit values).
If there is no locking the value can change just before/after the test.
Even if it were subject to read/write tearing absolutely the worst that
could happen is a zero being detected when the value changes between
two non-zero values.
That isn't relevant here - it is just a boolean.

-- David


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-02  8:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-31 15:39 [PATCH net] ipv6: use READ_ONCE() in ipv6_flowlabel_get() Runyu Xiao
2026-05-31 18:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-06-01 12:22 ` David Laight
2026-06-01 12:36   ` Eric Dumazet
2026-06-01 21:31     ` David Laight
2026-06-01 23:14       ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-06-02  8:00         ` David Laight [this message]
2026-06-02  8:10           ` Eric Dumazet
2026-06-02  9:46             ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260602090034.7a5c243e@pumpkin \
    --to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox