Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,  eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] rtnetlink: use dev_isalive() in rtnl_getlink()
Date: Tue,  2 Jun 2026 09:13:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260602091319.1753654-1-edumazet@google.com> (raw)

rtnl_getlink() uses an RCU lookup to get the netdevice pointer.

When/If rtnl_lock() is used, we should check if the netdevice is not
being dismantled before potentially perform illegal actions.

Move dev_isalive() out of net/core/net-sysfs.c and make it available
in include/linux/netdevice.h

Return -ENODEV if rtnl_getlink() finds a device which is currently
being dismantled and RTNL is requested.

Fixes: e896e5c0734b ("rtnetlink: do not acquire RTNL in rtnl_getlink() with RTEXT_FILTER_NAME_ONLY")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/netdevice.h | 6 ++++++
 net/core/net-sysfs.c      | 6 ------
 net/core/rtnetlink.c      | 5 +++++
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 74507c006490f180d2fac6594f6dcf2c86d53919..bfc847bc47fd957b58174dc4d2b82e2e8b461405 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -5660,6 +5660,12 @@ static inline const char *netdev_name(const struct net_device *dev)
 	return dev->name;
 }
 
+/* Caller holds RTNL, netdev->lock or RCU */
+static inline bool dev_isalive(const struct net_device *dev)
+{
+	return READ_ONCE(dev->reg_state) <= NETREG_REGISTERED;
+}
+
 static inline const char *netdev_reg_state(const struct net_device *dev)
 {
 	u8 reg_state = READ_ONCE(dev->reg_state);
diff --git a/net/core/net-sysfs.c b/net/core/net-sysfs.c
index 3318b5666e438fe5bab2bcfed2bb260c7b4d5a63..0e71c9ed41e81d85af33a4339f556a0c5d760243 100644
--- a/net/core/net-sysfs.c
+++ b/net/core/net-sysfs.c
@@ -37,12 +37,6 @@ static const char fmt_uint[] = "%u\n";
 static const char fmt_ulong[] = "%lu\n";
 static const char fmt_u64[] = "%llu\n";
 
-/* Caller holds RTNL, netdev->lock or RCU */
-static inline int dev_isalive(const struct net_device *dev)
-{
-	return READ_ONCE(dev->reg_state) <= NETREG_REGISTERED;
-}
-
 /* There is a possible ABBA deadlock between rtnl_lock and kernfs_node->active,
  * when unregistering a net device and accessing associated sysfs files. The
  * potential deadlock is as follow:
diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index 652dd008955a90691403de9a54d8693d64ea7799..9e90d02b73c2909409e12adfcec3940b49dcbaa1 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -4265,6 +4265,10 @@ static int rtnl_getlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 retry:
 	if (need_rtnl) {
 		rtnl_lock();
+		if (!dev_isalive(dev)) {
+			err = -ENODEV;
+			goto unlock;
+		}
 		/* Synchronize the carrier state so we don't report a state
 		 * that we're not actually going to honour immediately; if
 		 * the driver just did a carrier off->on transition, we can
@@ -4282,6 +4286,7 @@ static int rtnl_getlink(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 				       nlh->nlmsg_seq, 0, 0, ext_filter_mask,
 				       0, NULL, 0, netnsid, GFP_KERNEL);
 
+unlock:
 	if (need_rtnl)
 		rtnl_unlock();
 
-- 
2.54.0.929.g9b7fa37559-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2026-06-02  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-02  9:13 Eric Dumazet [this message]
2026-06-02 12:23 ` [PATCH net-next] rtnetlink: use dev_isalive() in rtnl_getlink() Jiayuan Chen
2026-06-02 12:47   ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260602091319.1753654-1-edumazet@google.com \
    --to=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox