From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BD1F35F8D2; Tue, 2 Jun 2026 18:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780424306; cv=none; b=CDSp+pGw6JUfa7pVI2Z+WrAOR91BsvUFe9zI2fqxb3LyG3yXK7sqVkjPPbfS+rlW4JtksD/DAf6Gv3Cw+F1/bR3p1ccXM8M9lgk32tMGaeQzxTsCOqZ+RypzECZ7bI55WBxPZKkdWvy1zWDvDeTNYRB9UDiT6Cm/ZHiXEc/5NYY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780424306; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kaiP5nlmx+o6J5dZn3NEtFmE+/1HE1JUKqGhpXDCNTk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=f3mSxbpF/6gxs8peUdyKPCRHvNVFdxZZOxgQrTq4JH/aKagjoCsvvRSS8bJdxec9QzaOc9E/mx6WKEc8fG7n1lRImV1Cx87GrSP81SyAOt7QlkWPVZUGfe+b4X+nmKofWkWLQiEcuAUwXVuCxhGclOPs5EoO4wKTgnOMjpz9jtY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=nTzLFTrT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="nTzLFTrT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB3181F00893; Tue, 2 Jun 2026 18:18:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1780424305; bh=tDyACb5/KqIGSD/zVzhz+P1a4GYNHCqoT3JaADnFHhQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=nTzLFTrTFDNrds9z+BHs394zIpMQnncSZ4LXYu1cjVIecgdX4KfmqViJq75KQHnuK abGBei3kUWObVS5dyh9mXuz/K5Fam0en2eakjVz/HigNAtrrNMiKcM8y1XZ554HLPF 4Ak4VGu63ZFHb6m3S/mvcQOViokzTcoWHewkWPfmS1QNHvpiHVeomNowhbIFYRWbsv 7KumAtMzFLELe/cAzhLLDVPj6BbSQJSphC1PbbT+HrKjTxlheI12ZAyyZkQi+wyq2C 1c/8QxH7mL4uPjYRAMQqivEvJX3FcdLJ1VD4RbAph4syzrxg2BYhJoMqH/xgNTgjei lqyacgx2jzZWg== Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 11:18:23 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Xin Long Cc: network dev , quic@lists.linux.dev, davem@davemloft.net, Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Stefan Metzmacher , Moritz Buhl , Tyler Fanelli , Pengtao He , Thomas Dreibholz , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, Steve French , Namjae Jeon , Tom Talpey , kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev, Chuck Lever , Jeff Layton , Steve Dickson , Hannes Reinecke , Alexander Aring , David Howells , Matthieu Baerts , John Ericson , Cong Wang , "D . Wythe" , Jason Baron , illiliti , Sabrina Dubroca , Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , Daniel Stenberg , Andy Gospodarek , mef@scarletmail.rutgers.edu, paul@jakma.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v12 00/15] net: introduce QUIC infrastructure and core subcomponents Message-ID: <20260602111823.0b1129d6@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2 Jun 2026 09:12:30 -0400 Xin Long wrote: > Note: I've run Sashiko on this patchset many times locally over the past > month and addressed all the real issues it found. I don't see any new real > issues being reported on: Coccinelle had a report tho: The NIPA CI coccicheck run flagged a new Coccinelle warning introduced by this patch: net/quic/crypto.c:1164:13-20: WARNING opportunity for kmemdup At line 1164 of the newly introduced net/quic/crypto.c, there is a kmalloc() call immediately followed by a memcpy() into the allocated buffer. Coccinelle's memdup checker suggests replacing this two-step pattern with a single kmemdup() call, which is the preferred kernel idiom. The fix is straightforward - replacing: p = kmalloc(len, gfp); if (!p) return -ENOMEM; memcpy(p, src, len); with: p = kmemdup(src, len, gfp); if (!p) return -ENOMEM; Please update the patch to use kmemdup() at that location.