From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Caio Morais <caiomorais@usp.br>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mpls: refactor mpls_dev_notify() to use guard(mutex)
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 12:03:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260602120335.715c19b7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260601143827.3087733-1-caiomorais@usp.br>
On Mon, 1 Jun 2026 11:38:23 -0300 Caio Morais wrote:
> Replace explicit mutex_lock() and mutex_unlock() calls with the
> guard(mutex) auto-cleanup helper from <linux/cleanup.h>.
Quoting documentation:
Using device-managed and cleanup.h constructs
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Netdev remains skeptical about promises of all "auto-cleanup" APIs,
including even ``devm_`` helpers, historically. They are not the preferred
style of implementation, merely an acceptable one.
Use of ``guard()`` is discouraged within any function longer than 20 lines,
``scoped_guard()`` is considered more readable. Using normal lock/unlock is
still (weakly) preferred.
Low level cleanup constructs (such as ``__free()``) can be used when building
APIs and helpers, especially scoped iterators. However, direct use of
``__free()`` within networking core and drivers is discouraged.
Similar guidance applies to declaring variables mid-function.
See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#using-device-managed-and-cleanup-h-constructs
In general please don't send us arbitrary code cleanup patches
if you're not actively working on real changes to the code.
--
pw-bot: reject
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-02 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-01 14:38 [PATCH] mpls: refactor mpls_dev_notify() to use guard(mutex) Caio Morais
2026-06-02 19:03 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260602120335.715c19b7@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=caiomorais@usp.br \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox