From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@gmail.com>
Cc: "Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Maxime Chevallier" <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Bjørn Mork" <bjorn@mork.no>, "Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 1/3] net: sfp: initialize i2c_block_size at adapter configure time
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 18:06:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260603180607.353551af@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260528205242.971410-2-jelonek.jonas@gmail.com>
On Thu, 28 May 2026 20:52:40 +0000 Jonas Jelonek wrote:
> sfp->i2c_block_size is only assigned in sfp_sm_mod_probe(), which runs
> from the state machine timer after SFP_F_PRESENT has been set. Between
> those two points, sfp_module_eeprom() (the ethtool -m callback) gates
> only on SFP_F_PRESENT and can be entered with i2c_block_size still at
> its kzalloc'd value of 0.
>
> On a pure-I2C adapter, sfp_i2c_read() then issues an i2c_transfer()
> with msgs[1].len = 0 inside a loop that subtracts this_len from len
> each iteration; on adapters that succeed a zero-length read the loop
> never advances, spinning while holding rtnl_lock.
>
> This was previously addressed by initializing i2c_block_size in
> sfp_alloc() (commit 813c2dd78618), but the initialization was dropped
> when i2c_block_size was split from i2c_max_block_size.
>
> Initialize sfp->i2c_block_size from sfp->i2c_max_block_size in
> sfp_i2c_configure(), so the field is valid as soon as the adapter is
> known. sfp_sm_mod_probe() still reassigns it on each module insertion
> to recover from a per-module clamp to 1 (sfp_id_needs_byte_io).
>
> Fixes: 7662abf4db94 ("net: phy: sfp: Add support for SMBus module access")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@gmail.com>
Thanks for splitting this out.
This is a fix it needs to take the net/Linus route rather than the
net-next route. I'll apply just patch 1 and you'll have to repost
patches 2 and 3 on Friday.
In the meantime - AI seems to also be saying something the cap being
potentially off by 1 in patch 2? We add 1 to the len? Maybe I'm
misunderstanding..
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260528205242.971410-2-jelonek.jonas@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 20:52 [PATCH net-next v9 0/3] net: sfp: extend SMBus support Jonas Jelonek
2026-05-28 20:52 ` [PATCH net-next v9 1/3] net: sfp: initialize i2c_block_size at adapter configure time Jonas Jelonek
2026-06-04 1:06 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-05-28 20:52 ` [PATCH net-next v9 2/3] net: sfp: apply I2C adapter quirks to limit block size Jonas Jelonek
2026-05-29 16:18 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-05-28 20:52 ` [PATCH net-next v9 3/3] net: sfp: extend SMBus support Jonas Jelonek
2026-06-04 1:14 ` [PATCH net-next v9 0/3] " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260603180607.353551af@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jelonek.jonas@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox