From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D216D3264CA; Thu, 4 Jun 2026 15:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780586211; cv=none; b=bl69spkLINfmWUtRe1Nfw/+r5+VbdGZEy6xhShfLGJ5o4wLihPEgfm9fBkbm9xWTRAGEsA6CnVHyfzhNfyYLCf6Ra0haKUu9KbUiJ5CzFw3saP6xEG2SDpVFqIvEI73q4qfpDy0SrPqMBNBYJlQsYAvipmObqBSqhSbA1BXv0kY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780586211; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Xplm850EmtocHCFaddifVaOvQwWbY+PSkg4aSxpr33g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SrykXQfrFzWtqoB9Kw1NU3WOj+KGUPhqteLzxMhW5iaYFZQv/KyHqoMStyCeLSCKyhcQCO32McxsNEz9aK4DYWa3av0eU20s5Ya3uqG4eWPEhSK49mhnjh1lPFRpxTh2ZS9/o+wQluWn8lIDcR91cVdhJ9elaVOW+PRRglDAF90= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=NRua8uDT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NRua8uDT" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06BA31F00893; Thu, 4 Jun 2026 15:16:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1780586210; bh=T51PPVxGiMTXN3uehSniEHKbuRPsHORJ6JVQ8bYHvPE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=NRua8uDTRS3Dh3IGDFUbMW9eZq2/w4vNMlLlF32oUPqajpkf8bQy/U6FqNpVUROY6 r3zFDSrF7bgpKSoVh0j6KZHnESq55M0MvzxCrMsBzW6fMIrrXGGhRN8Etx49ZToiKe fEyaI+TKlJ0IJKEpylkBsy2GLI7sQoRjjym8zdcKQZms1/CDVNgHiqg+o4xdukXPx5 KR3K5puhvbjmPxrE8LfKDsUDlrSdWiQYtNXiHfRYcy2Mw2PZyzkcR/q9NE5EhcY/jU L2BrRKU8FyB2PfbHY7fgyBF3HujNtbR5HcESv3RmWZnakc68L6AP5y4Kmpvedp1276 qJXHKslYK5gVA== Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 08:16:49 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Ivan Vecera Cc: Arkadiusz Kubalewski , Vadim Fedorenko , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko , "David S. Miller" , Donald Hunter , Eric Dumazet , Jiri Pirko , Michal Schmidt , Paolo Abeni , Pasi Vaananen , Petr Oros , Prathosh Satish , Simon Horman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Grzegorz Nitka Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/4] dpll: add DPLL_PIN_TYPE_INT_NCO pin type Message-ID: <20260604081649.1ae5302d@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260531194423.383366-1-ivecera@redhat.com> <20260531194423.383366-2-ivecera@redhat.com> <20260603185037.05f8c6a0@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 4 Jun 2026 17:01:36 +0200 Ivan Vecera wrote: > > Purely going on intuition here but feels like NCO should be a mode > > (enum dpll_mode) rather than one of the input pins? > > > > More acks here would be great, Vadim, Arkadiusz, Grzegorz... ? > > I had a long discussion with Jiri about this and we agreed finally > that dpll_mode represents a reference (input pin) selection strategy > mode and not a DPLL device running mode. Long discussion? I see 2 emails ;) Let's hear from others. (thanks for the link BTW, _if_ there's a v6 please put it in the cover letter)