From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, eddyz87@gmail.com,
memxor@gmail.com, martin.lau@kernel.org,
mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com, ameryhung@gmail.com,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/3] bpf: Compare parent_id in refsafe() for REF_TYPE_PTR
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2026 15:09:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260604220904.1032145-3-ameryhung@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604220904.1032145-1-ameryhung@gmail.com>
refsafe() compared each reference's id and type but not its parent_id,
so two states whose PTR references differ only in the parent object they
were derived from could be wrongly treated as equivalent and pruned. Fix
it by checking parent_id too.
Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/states.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/states.c b/kernel/bpf/states.c
index 5945956a7573..06d9ae24f006 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/states.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/states.c
@@ -890,6 +890,9 @@ static bool refsafe(struct bpf_verifier_state *old, struct bpf_verifier_state *c
return false;
switch (old->refs[i].type) {
case REF_TYPE_PTR:
+ if (!check_ids(old->refs[i].parent_id, cur->refs[i].parent_id, idmap))
+ return false;
+ break;
case REF_TYPE_IRQ:
break;
case REF_TYPE_LOCK:
--
2.53.0-Meta
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-04 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 22:09 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/3] Object relationship refactor followup Amery Hung
2026-06-04 22:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/3] bpf: Fix dead error check on acquire_reference() in check_kfunc_call Amery Hung
2026-06-04 22:43 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-04 23:16 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-04 22:09 ` Amery Hung [this message]
2026-06-04 22:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/3] bpf: Compare parent_id in refsafe() for REF_TYPE_PTR bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-04 23:21 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-04 23:27 ` Amery Hung
2026-06-04 22:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/3] selftests/bpf: Use bpf_dynptr_slice() to read file dynptr in leak test Amery Hung
2026-06-04 23:22 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-04 22:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/3] Object relationship refactor followup Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-06-04 23:20 ` Amery Hung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260604220904.1032145-3-ameryhung@gmail.com \
--to=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox