Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	metze@samba.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	io-uring@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: move .getsockopt away from __user buffers (update 1)
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 16:14:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260605161424.334a05d5@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aiK94g9vphHls3x_@gmail.com>

On Fri, 5 Jun 2026 05:25:21 -0700
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 03:30:28AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > Currently, the .getsockopt callback requires __user pointers:
> > 
> >   int (*getsockopt)(struct socket *sock, int level,
> >                     int optname, char __user *optval, int __user *optlen);
> > 
> > This prevents kernel callers (io_uring, BPF) from using getsockopt on
> > levels other than SOL_SOCKET, since they pass kernel pointers.
> > 
> > Following Linus' suggestion [0], this series introduces sockopt_t, a
> > type-safe wrapper around iov_iter, 

I'd have thought it would also have been better to use a wrapper function
instead of direct calls to copy_from_iter().
There is no need for most of the code to know there is a iov_iter hiding
inside sockopt_t.

-- David

> > and a getsockopt_iter callback that
> > works with both user and kernel buffers. AF_PACKET and CAN raw are
> > converted as initial users, with selftests covering the trickiest
> > conversion patterns.  
> 
> Quick update on this effort.
> 
> All proto_ops users have been converted to getsockopt_iter and submitted.
> 
> Most conversions are already in linux-next. Three remain:
> 
> 1) rds: Under review
>    https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260605-getsock_more-v2-3-80f38cdb8706@debian.org/
> 
> 2) smc: Submitted today. This is only limited to UBUF right now
>    https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260605-getsockopt_smc-v1-1-65da62fa44c4@debian.org/
> 
> 3) CAN drivers: Reviewed and acked, pending Marc's merge
>    https://lore.kernel.org/all/f83e25e1-b9f5-4810-bbd6-fdb8d2a10c8e@hartkopp.net/
> 
> Once these are merged, I'll rename getsockopt_iter to getsockopt and
> remove the legacy path.
> 
> Next, I'll convert struct proto the same way to eliminate the remaining
> userspace optlen/optval pointers.
> 
> After that, io_uring getsockopt operations will be unblocked.
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-05 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-08 10:30 [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: move .getsockopt away from __user buffers Breno Leitao
2026-04-08 10:30 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] net: add getsockopt_iter callback to proto_ops Breno Leitao
2026-04-08 10:30 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/4] net: call getsockopt_iter if available Breno Leitao
2026-04-08 10:30 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] af_packet: convert to getsockopt_iter Breno Leitao
2026-04-08 10:30 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] can: raw: " Breno Leitao
2026-04-08 11:26 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: move .getsockopt away from __user buffers David Laight
2026-04-08 13:52   ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-08 18:56     ` David Laight
2026-04-10 12:29       ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-10 14:15         ` David Laight
2026-04-08 13:56   ` Stefan Metzmacher
2026-04-09  8:39     ` Stefan Metzmacher
2026-04-08 17:02 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-04-10 12:52   ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-10 15:11     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-04-13 22:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-06-05 12:25 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: move .getsockopt away from __user buffers (update 1) Breno Leitao
2026-06-05 15:14   ` David Laight [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260605161424.334a05d5@pumpkin \
    --to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=metze@samba.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox