From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f52.google.com (mail-wm1-f52.google.com [209.85.128.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D995F380FDC for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2026 10:22:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.52 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780741377; cv=none; b=iMHd9qzm4XoZK1aBN2QPR72xRzSFJxSOENX7AUnt3J1D00NrceAcc2JajQaInUnq1m3PctDIfTTp7zIgkzKWGZSbhYfOSsj2gPdxrR15oem/853+ipKOLzmCRIz75BMpPu16wdSOyEBO4KMjme4P4RcI+yC1vbvqa+DZI8GdDrw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780741377; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6ZCo5g5YBCheH6lxLHUPDkhAwohoDkXUQMyBGc7LXHw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=N3g6hbLjSsPFUtfEry8c4UKwqhI6pD/3jMVpJM1MZu9KcF2sHhaw+Goq0bG/CstaWYgRY6Z90z04e1QVC712YHj9KCzKOFxZ+x4Jvp9Hn2SbDt8oTgI0RRdq8yy6xJ3vs+4H1eGXsmXxBsotqc2+IJ/L1KwM6ptLiuopp4LFe2c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=hKtg9Daq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.52 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="hKtg9Daq" Received: by mail-wm1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-490b43e2b95so22463135e9.0 for ; Sat, 06 Jun 2026 03:22:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1780741374; x=1781346174; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=+PYftnEwTkOLQeoNu4nW8+o38nbEt2RMPyp6dfwToa0=; b=hKtg9DaqIzHht9h/SEID0icP61633FjrvmqTBmsAZc+rb3Xco+LhMeWPch3DMUAbAk hcZM2qcGxPM3XWviyLgvYy7mAvDsndr9Lz1n0ujQsJuFZSxRESfzlpAcK2CMJmYl1JYZ n8RBnwflPJti7i9pBZDIDjG6buA+ViQumBbw+iOt5kJH4S0PRJ+wodn8QgjXoKtuaONc 8F2szrieZFskNupvhkMwOQi4eF4wGGJnyUG2NqenMFhWpyMALaet5dmcKNCFzw+7E+WL ZDGARKitTcWKzLeXlpTmHUi5EDrFSZn/4yYa8Z+kgvUxtWDTmOSz9tfjTwwUAirM/haW m5xQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1780741374; x=1781346174; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+PYftnEwTkOLQeoNu4nW8+o38nbEt2RMPyp6dfwToa0=; b=d528bho7JQ7mnUv7UWo46pnKUAy3G+zP3mbqXABO9f7xzC7KOqulVz7HQUV1hUzieq LtIo0EQxFuvX6De8OB8IAkVD4ZZesSuqIEdTt/EUokcjPKzMMmHIL++3KM6bvcuTEzv6 Rkz+1c2e2MJ/gylT3HXpFt1dWyNf6DMfwslTz/XtQGQCwIUmxm+4OwN2bx8lidA88Xik cJdgcOUYpsY8ZLtcyTl3od19o4flnNntl/BXYmCndFQ+/6QhLlB7i1atK+f/PtRnojrD slaXF+nu/DyuYhr0JhyPHNyrho3f5udehrhO1JCc+abhU8cMlnkWqIMGyMc0LlM7oGxF 8VTA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ/hyFpSbuwxwdT8YoSpjxsJ6kQZjaAboF3CIBNhOf3mrIw8oXL7f3XBgdWU9Y2L1bdKi0lnSgk=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzPzMbREy4rVE3VFWkwuGIHXUv7dGAZ+VSUQ1QVXuwVsSm4VpYF 1w0ehrLPyGyOKIiXPsCl7ns1yhuotruJvKTf2kziWAxNdoTuvB6AVQ7+ X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OGkezRjfwxhSZhqFF3N4KLuZA82yGdhrtn0NmRN2Vdh6r4NTDV2FL72wxqsNcM SAcqo8zgQ1hgNTcAvInNmZrdQCLyUa7XAyvA0R76FxT5eNOrVIveS1NzhSznzKwAl92WUZduP4s HKfFvNkrIkHCpHhVtAcEFezHAvv7iXtsuSGVPEdjiUwGHJ451oNIysh+KR1IZTZzLUWqvkY4HPE NqTAmyU0BnVezO03a27tHgwhTB4DEux/iVDbdzv0lJcvyMPSboCqJgxVzdWbvgpuXU9TiLkr68G dvqDuc84AfAdBxmgdeH/ICyxBYlTuOdveZfLBTcXk7lAUmx+wwH4AzV8D9gwrP0tPMG1ItXxuaa dfgxVPBJ08lMRWocoHBRD5XvlunLwBIaW8fCdaHJV5wUlwibHQcAHEdUMNvn80lr0tm8ZkRSSiR Cxpw/XMSpa+ZRCedXjiXqRIXx0i9os1uZl5QrzXoY1HDY52zQgxSVawR6UpK4GVFdDUFblIfr/A a0CtsMVJQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:35d4:b0:490:b8d3:5dcc with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-490c25e4634mr128363515e9.19.1780741374229; Sat, 06 Jun 2026 03:22:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pumpkin (82-69-66-36.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.69.66.36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-4601f2dcae2sm35545066f8f.6.2026.06.06.03.22.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 06 Jun 2026 03:22:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2026 11:22:52 +0100 From: David Laight To: Stefan Metzmacher Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski , Askar Safin , akpm@linux-foundation.org, axboe@kernel.dk, brauner@kernel.org, david@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, hch@infradead.org, jack@suse.cz, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, miklos@szeredi.hu, netdev@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, pfalcato@suse.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, willy@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] vmsplice: make vmsplice a trivial wrapper for preadv2/pwritev2 Message-ID: <20260606112252.3c70bad6@pumpkin> In-Reply-To: <634c8ae2-3f1c-46b1-b002-1e2ac797dd80@samba.org> References: <20260602225426.122258-1-safinaskar@gmail.com> <512d948f-7883-4d8c-b2c5-a777e70ca975@samba.org> <20260605131942.4584728e@pumpkin> <634c8ae2-3f1c-46b1-b002-1e2ac797dd80@samba.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 5 Jun 2026 17:20:34 +0200 Stefan Metzmacher wrote: > Hi David, > > >>> So sendfile() as a concept (whether you use combinations of splice() > >>> system calls or the sendfile system call itsefl) isn't necessarily > >>> only about the zero-copy, it's really also about avoiding the user > >>> space memory management. > >> > >> I don't think so. Ok, maybe for webservers just serving tiny > >> html files, that's true. But for me with Samba it's really the > >> copy_to/from_iter() that is the major factor. > > > > Is that copy also doing the ip checksum? > > Not in my tests. I guess there's offload in the network hardware > for this. There will be, it is just whether the syscall checksum is actually being suppressed. -- David > > At least at the syscall layer of sendmsg() there's no checksuming > happening. > > metze >