Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhenzhong Wu <jt26wzz@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
	haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, menglong8.dong@gmail.com,
	eddyz87@gmail.com, shung-hsi.yu@suse.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	mykolal@fb.com, tamird@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH stable 6.6.y v2 1/3] bpf: drop knowledge-losing __reg_combine_{32,64}_into_{64,32} logic
Date: Mon,  8 Jun 2026 01:09:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260607170959.823755-2-jt26wzz@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260607170959.823755-1-jt26wzz@gmail.com>

From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 9e314f5d8682e1fe6ac214fb34580a238b6fd3c4 ]

When performing 32-bit conditional operation operating on lower 32 bits
of a full 64-bit register, register full value isn't changed. We just
potentially gain new knowledge about that register's lower 32 bits.

Unfortunately, __reg_combine_{32,64}_into_{64,32} logic that
reg_set_min_max() performs as a last step, can lose information in some
cases due to __mark_reg64_unbounded() and __reg_assign_32_into_64().
That's bad and unnecessary. Especially __reg_assign_32_into_64() looks
out of place here, because we are not performing zero-extending
subregister assignment during conditional jump.

Replace __reg_combine_* with reg_bounds_sync(), which derives u64/s64
bounds from u32/s32 and vice versa.

For coerce_reg_to_size(), reset subreg bounds for 1- and 2-byte loads and
then use reg_bounds_sync() to recover as much information as possible.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102033759.2541186-10-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
[ zhenzhong: backport to 6.6.y verifier.c layout. ]
Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Wu <jt26wzz@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 60 ++++++-------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 0d90236d0..5f94bff12 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2448,51 +2448,6 @@ static void __reg_assign_32_into_64(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
 	}
 }
 
-static void __reg_combine_32_into_64(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
-{
-	/* special case when 64-bit register has upper 32-bit register
-	 * zeroed. Typically happens after zext or <<32, >>32 sequence
-	 * allowing us to use 32-bit bounds directly,
-	 */
-	if (tnum_equals_const(tnum_clear_subreg(reg->var_off), 0)) {
-		__reg_assign_32_into_64(reg);
-	} else {
-		/* Otherwise the best we can do is push lower 32bit known and
-		 * unknown bits into register (var_off set from jmp logic)
-		 * then learn as much as possible from the 64-bit tnum
-		 * known and unknown bits. The previous smin/smax bounds are
-		 * invalid here because of jmp32 compare so mark them unknown
-		 * so they do not impact tnum bounds calculation.
-		 */
-		__mark_reg64_unbounded(reg);
-	}
-	reg_bounds_sync(reg);
-}
-
-static bool __reg64_bound_s32(s64 a)
-{
-	return a >= S32_MIN && a <= S32_MAX;
-}
-
-static bool __reg64_bound_u32(u64 a)
-{
-	return a >= U32_MIN && a <= U32_MAX;
-}
-
-static void __reg_combine_64_into_32(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
-{
-	__mark_reg32_unbounded(reg);
-	if (__reg64_bound_s32(reg->smin_value) && __reg64_bound_s32(reg->smax_value)) {
-		reg->s32_min_value = (s32)reg->smin_value;
-		reg->s32_max_value = (s32)reg->smax_value;
-	}
-	if (__reg64_bound_u32(reg->umin_value) && __reg64_bound_u32(reg->umax_value)) {
-		reg->u32_min_value = (u32)reg->umin_value;
-		reg->u32_max_value = (u32)reg->umax_value;
-	}
-	reg_bounds_sync(reg);
-}
-
 /* Mark a register as having a completely unknown (scalar) value. */
 static void __mark_reg_unknown(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 			       struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
@@ -6164,9 +6119,10 @@ static void coerce_reg_to_size(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int size)
 	 * values are also truncated so we push 64-bit bounds into
 	 * 32-bit bounds. Above were truncated < 32-bits already.
 	 */
-	if (size >= 4)
-		return;
-	__reg_combine_64_into_32(reg);
+	if (size < 4) {
+		__mark_reg32_unbounded(reg);
+		reg_bounds_sync(reg);
+	}
 }
 
 static void set_sext64_default_val(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int size)
@@ -14329,13 +14285,13 @@ static void reg_set_min_max(struct bpf_reg_state *true_reg,
 					     tnum_subreg(false_32off));
 		true_reg->var_off = tnum_or(tnum_clear_subreg(true_64off),
 					    tnum_subreg(true_32off));
-		__reg_combine_32_into_64(false_reg);
-		__reg_combine_32_into_64(true_reg);
+		reg_bounds_sync(false_reg);
+		reg_bounds_sync(true_reg);
 	} else {
 		false_reg->var_off = false_64off;
 		true_reg->var_off = true_64off;
-		__reg_combine_64_into_32(false_reg);
-		__reg_combine_64_into_32(true_reg);
+		reg_bounds_sync(false_reg);
+		reg_bounds_sync(true_reg);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.43.0

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-07 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-07 17:09 [PATCH stable 6.6.y v2 0/3] bpf: backport scalar not-equal tracking fixes Zhenzhong Wu
2026-06-07 17:09 ` Zhenzhong Wu [this message]
2026-06-07 17:09 ` [PATCH stable 6.6.y v2 2/3] bpf: make the verifier tracks the "not equal" for regs Zhenzhong Wu
2026-06-07 17:09 ` [PATCH stable 6.6.y v2 3/3] selftests/bpf: add helper retval linked scalar pruning test Zhenzhong Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260607170959.823755-2-jt26wzz@gmail.com \
    --to=jt26wzz@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=shung-hsi.yu@suse.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tamird@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox