From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v12 0/6] tls: receive-path fixes and clean-ups
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2026 20:11:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260608201122.0ca7b1f1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260604-tls-read-sock-v12-0-b114efa6e3e2@oracle.com>
On Thu, 04 Jun 2026 13:48:23 -0400 Chuck Lever wrote:
> I'd like to encourage in-kernel kTLS consumers (NFSD, NVMe/TCP) to
> coalesce on the use of read_sock. While auditing read_sock for that
> purpose, Hannes and Sabrina flagged a few rough edges in the receive
> paths.
>
> This series is a set of clean-ups, not a performance series. Async
> batch decryption and its submit/deliver scaffolding were dropped
> during previous review: async_capable is always false for TLS 1.3,
> the version NFSD and NVMe/TCP both require, so async-related
> improvements were unreachable for the in-kernel consumers this
> work targets.
>
> A subsequent series will introduce infrastructure to support
> KeyUpdate for in-kernel kTLS consumers, which need to handle TLS
> Alert messages that trigger a tlshd upcall.
I still feel like the last patch should have _some_ kind of benchmark /
experimental result included, but okay, let me not torture you :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 3:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-04 17:48 [PATCH net-next v12 0/6] tls: receive-path fixes and clean-ups Chuck Lever
2026-06-04 17:48 ` [PATCH net-next v12 1/6] tls: Avoid evaluating freed skb in tls_sw_read_sock() loop Chuck Lever
2026-06-04 17:48 ` [PATCH net-next v12 2/6] tls: Re-present partially-consumed records in tls_sw_read_sock() Chuck Lever
2026-06-04 17:48 ` [PATCH net-next v12 3/6] tls: Move decrypt-failure abort into tls_rx_one_record() Chuck Lever
2026-06-07 3:42 ` Chuck Lever
2026-06-04 17:48 ` [PATCH net-next v12 4/6] tls: Factor tls_strp_msg_consume() from tls_strp_msg_done() Chuck Lever
2026-06-04 17:48 ` [PATCH net-next v12 5/6] tls: Suppress spurious saved_data_ready on all receive paths Chuck Lever
2026-06-04 17:48 ` [PATCH net-next v12 6/6] tls: Flush backlog before waiting for a new record Chuck Lever
2026-06-07 22:10 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-06-09 3:11 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-06-09 3:20 ` [PATCH net-next v12 0/6] tls: receive-path fixes and clean-ups patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260608201122.0ca7b1f1@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hare@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox