Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Joyner <eric.joyner@amd.com>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@amd.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
	Eric Joyner <eric.joyner@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 3/5] ionic: Report "rx_bits_phy" stat to ethtool
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 23:18:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610061830.51037-4-eric.joyner@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610061830.51037-1-eric.joyner@amd.com>

This stat contains the number of total bits that the PHY has received;
it's useful for BER calculations. Add it to the ethtool stats output.

However, since this is one of the new "extra port stats", it's reported
in a different manner than the existing port stats and only
conditionally added to the ethtool stats output list: both the
DEV_CAP_EXTRA_STATS capability must be supported by the firmware, and
the firmware must set the value of the statistic to something other than
IONIC_STAT_INVALID.

To help support this scheme, the extra port stats region is initialized to
0xff's/IONIC_STAT_INVALID by the driver, to ensure the statistics that
the driver knows about but the firmware does not are still invalid
to the driver.

Signed-off-by: Eric Joyner <eric.joyner@amd.com>
---
 .../net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.h   |  1 +
 .../net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_main.c  |  6 ++
 .../net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_stats.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.h
index 35566f97eaea..5f677bcbaf02 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_dev.h
@@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ struct ionic_dev {
 	u32 port_info_sz;
 	struct ionic_port_info *port_info;
 	dma_addr_t port_info_pa;
+	struct ionic_port_extra_stats port_extra_stats_cache;
 
 	struct ionic_devinfo dev_info;
 };
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_main.c
index 3c5200e2fdb7..306d9d160e17 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_main.c
@@ -731,6 +731,12 @@ int ionic_port_init(struct ionic *ionic)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
+	/* If the driver knows about more "extra stats" than the firmware,
+	 * make sure these stats are marked as invalid.
+	 */
+	memset(&idev->port_info->extra_stats, 0xff,
+	       sizeof(idev->port_info->extra_stats));
+
 	sz = min(sizeof(ident->port.config), sizeof(idev->dev_cmd_regs->data));
 
 	mutex_lock(&ionic->dev_cmd_lock);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_stats.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_stats.c
index 0107599a9dd4..e81190cc9d2f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_stats.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_stats.c
@@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ static const struct ionic_stat_desc ionic_rx_stats_desc[] = {
 #define IONIC_NUM_PORT_STATS ARRAY_SIZE(ionic_port_stats_desc)
 #define IONIC_NUM_TX_STATS ARRAY_SIZE(ionic_tx_stats_desc)
 #define IONIC_NUM_RX_STATS ARRAY_SIZE(ionic_rx_stats_desc)
+#define IONIC_NUM_EXTRA_PORT_STATS	1
 
 #define MAX_Q(lif)   ((lif)->netdev->real_num_tx_queues)
 
@@ -232,6 +233,26 @@ static void ionic_get_lif_stats(struct ionic_lif *lif,
 	stats->hw_tx_aborted_errors = ns.tx_aborted_errors;
 }
 
+static u32 ionic_extra_port_stats_get_count(struct ionic_lif *lif)
+{
+	struct ionic_dev *idev = &lif->ionic->idev;
+	struct ionic_port_extra_stats *pes_cache;
+	u32 count = 0;
+
+	if (!(lif->ionic->ident.dev.capabilities &
+	      cpu_to_le64(IONIC_DEV_CAP_EXTRA_STATS)))
+		return count;
+
+	/* Cache copy for subsequent ethtool calls */
+	pes_cache = &idev->port_extra_stats_cache;
+	*pes_cache = idev->port_info->extra_stats;
+
+	if (pes_cache->rx_bits_phy != IONIC_STAT_INVALID)
+		count++;
+
+	return count;
+}
+
 static u64 ionic_sw_stats_get_count(struct ionic_lif *lif)
 {
 	u64 total = 0, tx_queues = MAX_Q(lif), rx_queues = MAX_Q(lif);
@@ -243,7 +264,7 @@ static u64 ionic_sw_stats_get_count(struct ionic_lif *lif)
 		rx_queues += 1;
 
 	total += IONIC_NUM_LIF_STATS;
-	total += IONIC_NUM_PORT_STATS;
+	total += IONIC_NUM_PORT_STATS + ionic_extra_port_stats_get_count(lif);
 
 	total += tx_queues * IONIC_NUM_TX_STATS;
 	total += rx_queues * IONIC_NUM_RX_STATS;
@@ -271,6 +292,20 @@ static void ionic_sw_stats_get_rx_strings(struct ionic_lif *lif, u8 **buf,
 				ionic_rx_stats_desc[i].name);
 }
 
+static void ionic_extra_port_stats_get_strings(struct ionic_lif *lif, u8 **buf)
+{
+	struct ionic_port_extra_stats *pes_cache;
+
+	if (!(lif->ionic->ident.dev.capabilities &
+	    cpu_to_le64(IONIC_DEV_CAP_EXTRA_STATS)))
+		return;
+
+	pes_cache = &lif->ionic->idev.port_extra_stats_cache;
+
+	if (pes_cache->rx_bits_phy != IONIC_STAT_INVALID)
+		ethtool_puts(buf, "rx_bits_phy");
+}
+
 static void ionic_sw_stats_get_strings(struct ionic_lif *lif, u8 **buf)
 {
 	int i, q_num;
@@ -280,6 +315,7 @@ static void ionic_sw_stats_get_strings(struct ionic_lif *lif, u8 **buf)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < IONIC_NUM_PORT_STATS; i++)
 		ethtool_puts(buf, ionic_port_stats_desc[i].name);
+	ionic_extra_port_stats_get_strings(lif, buf);
 
 	for (q_num = 0; q_num < MAX_Q(lif); q_num++)
 		ionic_sw_stats_get_tx_strings(lif, buf, q_num);
@@ -322,6 +358,25 @@ static void ionic_sw_stats_get_rxq_values(struct ionic_lif *lif, u64 **buf,
 	}
 }
 
+static void ionic_extra_port_stats_get_values(struct ionic_lif *lif, u64 **buf)
+{
+	struct ionic_port_extra_stats *pes_cache;
+
+	if (!(lif->ionic->ident.dev.capabilities &
+	      cpu_to_le64(IONIC_DEV_CAP_EXTRA_STATS)))
+		return;
+
+	/* The number of statistics added to @buf here must equal
+	 * ionic_extra_port_stats_get_count().
+	 */
+	pes_cache = &lif->ionic->idev.port_extra_stats_cache;
+
+	if (pes_cache->rx_bits_phy != IONIC_STAT_INVALID) {
+		**buf = le64_to_cpu(pes_cache->rx_bits_phy);
+		(*buf)++;
+	}
+}
+
 static void ionic_sw_stats_get_values(struct ionic_lif *lif, u64 **buf)
 {
 	struct ionic_port_stats *port_stats;
@@ -341,6 +396,7 @@ static void ionic_sw_stats_get_values(struct ionic_lif *lif, u64 **buf)
 					     &ionic_port_stats_desc[i]);
 		(*buf)++;
 	}
+	ionic_extra_port_stats_get_values(lif, buf);
 
 	for (q_num = 0; q_num < MAX_Q(lif); q_num++)
 		ionic_sw_stats_get_txq_values(lif, buf, q_num);
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-10  6:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-10  6:18 [PATCH net-next v4 0/5] ionic: Expose more port stats to ethtool Eric Joyner
2026-06-10  6:18 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/5] ionic: Fix check in ionic_get_link_ext_stats Eric Joyner
2026-06-10  6:18 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/5] ionic: Update ionic_if.h with new extra port stats Eric Joyner
2026-06-10  6:18 ` Eric Joyner [this message]
2026-06-10  6:18 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/5] ionic: Report "link_down_events_phy" in ethtool statistics Eric Joyner
2026-06-10  6:18 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/5] ionic: Add .get_fec_stats ethtool handler Eric Joyner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260610061830.51037-4-eric.joyner@amd.com \
    --to=eric.joyner@amd.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=brett.creeley@amd.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox