From: Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: aconole@redhat.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com>,
Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>,
Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
dev@openvswitch.org (open list:OPENVSWITCH),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 3/4] net: openvswitch: decouple flow_table from ovs_mutex
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 06:58:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611045817.1302665-4-amorenoz@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611045817.1302665-1-amorenoz@redhat.com>
In order to protect flow operations from RTNL contention, this patch
decouples flow_table modifications from ovs_mutex by means of the
following:
1 - Create a new mutex inside the flow_table that protects it from
concurrent modifications.
Putting the mutex inside flow_table makes it easier to consume for
functions inside flow_table.c that do not currently take pointers to the
datapath.
Some function signatures need to be changed to accept flow_table so that
lockdep checks can be performed.
2 - Create a reference count to temporarily extend rcu protection from
the datapath to the flow_table.
One reference is held by the datapath, the other is temporarily
increased during flow modifications.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com>
---
net/openvswitch/datapath.c | 174 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
net/openvswitch/flow_table.c | 46 +++++++--
net/openvswitch/flow_table.h | 37 +++++++-
3 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/datapath.c b/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
index 72ad3ed12675..700ea79a324e 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/datapath.c
@@ -88,13 +88,17 @@ static void ovs_notify(struct genl_family *family,
* DOC: Locking:
*
* All writes e.g. Writes to device state (add/remove datapath, port, set
- * operations on vports, etc.), Writes to other state (flow table
- * modifications, set miscellaneous datapath parameters, etc.) are protected
- * by ovs_lock.
+ * operations on vports, etc.) and writes to other datapath parameters
+ * are protected by ovs_lock.
+ *
+ * Writes to the flow table are NOT protected by ovs_lock. Instead, a per-table
+ * mutex and reference count are used (see comment above "struct flow_table"
+ * definition). On some few occasions, the per-flow table mutex is nested
+ * inside ovs_mutex.
*
* Reads are protected by RCU.
*
- * There are a few special cases (mostly stats) that have their own
+ * There are a few other special cases (mostly stats) that have their own
* synchronization but they nest under all of above and don't interact with
* each other.
*
@@ -759,16 +763,19 @@ static struct genl_family dp_packet_genl_family __ro_after_init = {
static void get_dp_stats(const struct datapath *dp, struct ovs_dp_stats *stats,
struct ovs_dp_megaflow_stats *mega_stats)
{
- struct flow_table *table = ovsl_dereference(dp->table);
+ struct flow_table *table;
int i;
memset(mega_stats, 0, sizeof(*mega_stats));
memset(stats, 0, sizeof(*stats));
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ table = rcu_dereference(dp->table);
if (table) {
stats->n_flows = ovs_flow_tbl_count(table);
mega_stats->n_masks = ovs_flow_tbl_num_masks(table);
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
stats->n_hit = stats->n_missed = stats->n_lost = 0;
@@ -1081,17 +1088,25 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_new(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
goto err_kfree_acts;
}
- ovs_lock();
+ rcu_read_lock();
dp = get_dp(net, ovs_header->dp_ifindex);
if (unlikely(!dp)) {
error = -ENODEV;
- goto err_unlock_ovs;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ goto err_kfree_reply;
}
- table = ovsl_dereference(dp->table);
- if (!table) {
+ table = rcu_dereference(dp->table);
+ if (!table || !ovs_flow_tbl_get(table)) {
error = -ENODEV;
- goto err_unlock_ovs;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ goto err_kfree_reply;
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ /* It is safe to dereference "table" after leaving rcu read-protected
+ * region because it's pinned by refcount.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&table->lock);
/* Check if this is a duplicate flow */
if (ovs_identifier_is_ufid(&new_flow->id))
@@ -1105,7 +1120,7 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_new(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
error = ovs_flow_tbl_insert(table, new_flow, &mask);
if (unlikely(error)) {
acts = NULL;
- goto err_unlock_ovs;
+ goto err_unlock_tbl;
}
if (unlikely(reply)) {
@@ -1117,7 +1132,6 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_new(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
ufid_flags);
BUG_ON(error < 0);
}
- ovs_unlock();
} else {
struct sw_flow_actions *old_acts;
@@ -1130,7 +1144,7 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_new(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
if (unlikely(info->nlhdr->nlmsg_flags & (NLM_F_CREATE
| NLM_F_EXCL))) {
error = -EEXIST;
- goto err_unlock_ovs;
+ goto err_unlock_tbl;
}
/* The flow identifier has to be the same for flow updates.
* Look for any overlapping flow.
@@ -1143,7 +1157,7 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_new(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
flow = NULL;
if (!flow) {
error = -ENOENT;
- goto err_unlock_ovs;
+ goto err_unlock_tbl;
}
}
/* Update actions. */
@@ -1159,20 +1173,23 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_new(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
ufid_flags);
BUG_ON(error < 0);
}
- ovs_unlock();
-
ovs_nla_free_flow_actions_rcu(old_acts);
ovs_flow_free(new_flow, false);
}
+ mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
+ ovs_flow_tbl_put(table);
+
if (reply)
ovs_notify(&dp_flow_genl_family, reply, info);
kfree(key);
return 0;
-err_unlock_ovs:
- ovs_unlock();
+err_unlock_tbl:
+ mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
+ ovs_flow_tbl_put(table);
+err_kfree_reply:
kfree_skb(reply);
err_kfree_acts:
ovs_nla_free_flow_actions(acts);
@@ -1301,17 +1318,26 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_set(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
}
}
- ovs_lock();
+ rcu_read_lock();
dp = get_dp(net, ovs_header->dp_ifindex);
if (unlikely(!dp)) {
error = -ENODEV;
- goto err_unlock_ovs;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ goto err_free_reply;
}
- table = ovsl_dereference(dp->table);
- if (!table) {
+ table = rcu_dereference(dp->table);
+ if (!table || !ovs_flow_tbl_get(table)) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
error = -ENODEV;
- goto err_unlock_ovs;
+ goto err_free_reply;
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ /* It is safe to dereference "table" after leaving rcu read-protected
+ * region because it's pinned by refcount.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&table->lock);
+
/* Check that the flow exists. */
if (ufid_present)
flow = ovs_flow_tbl_lookup_ufid(table, &sfid);
@@ -1319,7 +1345,7 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_set(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
flow = ovs_flow_tbl_lookup_exact(table, &match);
if (unlikely(!flow)) {
error = -ENOENT;
- goto err_unlock_ovs;
+ goto err_unlock_tbl;
}
/* Update actions, if present. */
@@ -1345,14 +1371,16 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_set(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
if (IS_ERR(reply)) {
error = PTR_ERR(reply);
- goto err_unlock_ovs;
+ goto err_unlock_tbl;
}
}
/* Clear stats. */
if (a[OVS_FLOW_ATTR_CLEAR])
ovs_flow_stats_clear(flow, table);
- ovs_unlock();
+
+ mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
+ ovs_flow_tbl_put(table);
if (reply)
ovs_notify(&dp_flow_genl_family, reply, info);
@@ -1361,8 +1389,10 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_set(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
return 0;
-err_unlock_ovs:
- ovs_unlock();
+err_unlock_tbl:
+ mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
+ ovs_flow_tbl_put(table);
+err_free_reply:
kfree_skb(reply);
err_kfree_acts:
ovs_nla_free_flow_actions(acts);
@@ -1400,17 +1430,24 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_get(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
if (err)
return err;
- ovs_lock();
+ rcu_read_lock();
dp = get_dp(sock_net(skb->sk), ovs_header->dp_ifindex);
if (!dp) {
- err = -ENODEV;
- goto unlock;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return -ENODEV;
}
- table = ovsl_dereference(dp->table);
- if (!table) {
- err = -ENODEV;
- goto unlock;
+ table = rcu_dereference(dp->table);
+ if (!table || !ovs_flow_tbl_get(table)) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return -ENODEV;
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ /* It is safe to dereference "table" after leaving rcu read-protected
+ * region because it's pinned by refcount.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&table->lock);
+
if (ufid_present)
flow = ovs_flow_tbl_lookup_ufid(table, &ufid);
@@ -1429,10 +1466,12 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_get(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
goto unlock;
}
- ovs_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
+ ovs_flow_tbl_put(table);
return genlmsg_reply(reply, info);
unlock:
- ovs_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
+ ovs_flow_tbl_put(table);
return err;
}
@@ -1462,17 +1501,24 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_del(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
return err;
}
- ovs_lock();
+ rcu_read_lock();
dp = get_dp(sock_net(skb->sk), ovs_header->dp_ifindex);
if (unlikely(!dp)) {
- err = -ENODEV;
- goto unlock;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return -ENODEV;
}
- table = ovsl_dereference(dp->table);
- if (!table) {
- err = -ENODEV;
- goto unlock;
+ table = rcu_dereference(dp->table);
+ if (!table || !ovs_flow_tbl_get(table)) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return -ENODEV;
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ /* It is safe to dereference "table" after leaving rcu read-protected
+ * region because it's pinned by refcount.
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&table->lock);
+
if (unlikely(!a[OVS_FLOW_ATTR_KEY] && !ufid_present)) {
err = ovs_flow_tbl_flush(table);
@@ -1489,7 +1535,7 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_del(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
}
ovs_flow_tbl_remove(table, flow);
- ovs_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
reply = ovs_flow_cmd_alloc_info((const struct sw_flow_actions __force *) flow->sf_acts,
&flow->id, info, false, ufid_flags);
@@ -1516,10 +1562,12 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_del(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
}
out_free:
+ ovs_flow_tbl_put(table);
ovs_flow_free(flow, true);
return 0;
unlock:
- ovs_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
+ ovs_flow_tbl_put(table);
return err;
}
@@ -1545,7 +1593,7 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
rcu_read_unlock();
return -ENODEV;
}
- table = rcu_dereference_ovsl(dp->table);
+ table = rcu_dereference(dp->table);
if (!table) {
rcu_read_unlock();
return -ENODEV;
@@ -1650,10 +1698,6 @@ static int ovs_dp_cmd_fill_info(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct flow_table *table;
int err, pids_len;
- table = ovsl_dereference(dp->table);
- if (!table)
- return -ENODEV;
-
ovs_header = genlmsg_put(skb, portid, seq, &dp_datapath_genl_family,
flags, cmd);
if (!ovs_header)
@@ -1678,8 +1722,12 @@ static int ovs_dp_cmd_fill_info(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb,
if (nla_put_u32(skb, OVS_DP_ATTR_USER_FEATURES, dp->user_features))
goto nla_put_failure;
- if (nla_put_u32(skb, OVS_DP_ATTR_MASKS_CACHE_SIZE,
- ovs_flow_tbl_masks_cache_size(table)))
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ table = rcu_dereference(dp->table);
+ err = table ? nla_put_u32(skb, OVS_DP_ATTR_MASKS_CACHE_SIZE,
+ ovs_flow_tbl_masks_cache_size(table)) : 0;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (err)
goto nla_put_failure;
if (dp->user_features & OVS_DP_F_DISPATCH_UPCALL_PER_CPU && pids) {
@@ -1817,7 +1865,9 @@ static int ovs_dp_change(struct datapath *dp, struct nlattr *a[])
return -ENODEV;
cache_size = nla_get_u32(a[OVS_DP_ATTR_MASKS_CACHE_SIZE]);
+ mutex_lock(&table->lock);
err = ovs_flow_tbl_masks_cache_resize(table, cache_size);
+ mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
if (err)
return err;
}
@@ -1968,7 +2018,7 @@ static int ovs_dp_cmd_new(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
err_destroy_stats:
free_percpu(dp->stats_percpu);
err_destroy_table:
- call_rcu(&table->rcu, ovs_flow_tbl_destroy_rcu);
+ ovs_flow_tbl_put(table);
err_destroy_dp:
kfree(dp);
err_destroy_reply:
@@ -2003,16 +2053,11 @@ static void __dp_destroy(struct datapath *dp)
*/
ovs_dp_detach_port(ovs_vport_ovsl(dp, OVSP_LOCAL));
- /* Flush sw_flow in the tables. RCU cb only releases resource
- * such as dp, ports and tables. That may avoid some issues
- * such as RCU usage warning.
- */
- table_instance_flow_flush(table, ovsl_dereference(table->ti),
- ovsl_dereference(table->ufid_ti));
+ rcu_assign_pointer(dp->table, NULL);
+ ovs_flow_tbl_put(table);
- /* RCU destroy the ports, meters and flow tables. */
+ /* RCU destroy the ports and meters. */
call_rcu(&dp->rcu, destroy_dp_rcu);
- call_rcu(&table->rcu, ovs_flow_tbl_destroy_rcu);
}
static int ovs_dp_cmd_del(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
@@ -2656,9 +2701,12 @@ static void ovs_dp_masks_rebalance(struct work_struct *work)
ovs_lock();
list_for_each_entry(dp, &ovs_net->dps, list_node) {
table = ovsl_dereference(dp->table);
- if (!table)
+ if (!table || !ovs_flow_tbl_get(table))
continue;
+ mutex_lock(&table->lock);
ovs_flow_masks_rebalance(table);
+ mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
+ ovs_flow_tbl_put(table);
}
ovs_unlock();
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
index 2ae168f31f50..3934873a44c3 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
@@ -45,6 +45,16 @@
static struct kmem_cache *flow_cache;
struct kmem_cache *flow_stats_cache __read_mostly;
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+int lockdep_ovs_tbl_is_held(const struct flow_table *table)
+{
+ if (debug_locks)
+ return lockdep_is_held(&table->lock);
+ else
+ return 1;
+}
+#endif
+
static u16 range_n_bytes(const struct sw_flow_key_range *range)
{
return range->end - range->start;
@@ -102,7 +112,7 @@ struct sw_flow *ovs_flow_alloc(void)
int ovs_flow_tbl_count(const struct flow_table *table)
{
- return table->count;
+ return READ_ONCE(table->count);
}
static void flow_free(struct sw_flow *flow)
@@ -417,6 +427,10 @@ struct flow_table *ovs_flow_tbl_alloc(void)
table = kzalloc_obj(*table, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!table)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+ mutex_init(&table->lock);
+ refcount_set(&table->refcnt, 1);
+
mc = tbl_mask_cache_alloc(MC_DEFAULT_HASH_ENTRIES);
if (!mc)
goto free_table;
@@ -449,6 +463,7 @@ struct flow_table *ovs_flow_tbl_alloc(void)
free_mask_cache:
__mask_cache_destroy(mc);
free_table:
+ mutex_destroy(&table->lock);
kfree(table);
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
@@ -467,7 +482,7 @@ static void table_instance_flow_free(struct flow_table *table,
struct sw_flow *flow)
{
hlist_del_rcu(&flow->flow_table.node[ti->node_ver]);
- table->count--;
+ WRITE_ONCE(table->count, table->count - 1);
if (ovs_identifier_is_ufid(&flow->id)) {
hlist_del_rcu(&flow->ufid_table.node[ufid_ti->node_ver]);
@@ -477,10 +492,10 @@ static void table_instance_flow_free(struct flow_table *table,
flow_mask_remove(table, flow->mask);
}
-/* Must be called with OVS mutex held. */
-void table_instance_flow_flush(struct flow_table *table,
- struct table_instance *ti,
- struct table_instance *ufid_ti)
+/* Must be called with table mutex held. */
+static void table_instance_flow_flush(struct flow_table *table,
+ struct table_instance *ti,
+ struct table_instance *ufid_ti)
{
int i;
@@ -500,7 +515,7 @@ void table_instance_flow_flush(struct flow_table *table,
if (WARN_ON(table->count != 0 ||
table->ufid_count != 0)) {
- table->count = 0;
+ WRITE_ONCE(table->count, 0);
table->ufid_count = 0;
}
}
@@ -513,7 +528,7 @@ static void table_instance_destroy(struct table_instance *ti,
}
/* No need for locking this function is called from RCU callback. */
-void ovs_flow_tbl_destroy_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
+static void ovs_flow_tbl_destroy_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
{
struct flow_table *table = container_of(rcu, struct flow_table, rcu);
@@ -525,9 +540,22 @@ void ovs_flow_tbl_destroy_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
call_rcu(&mc->rcu, mask_cache_rcu_cb);
call_rcu(&ma->rcu, mask_array_rcu_cb);
table_instance_destroy(ti, ufid_ti);
+ mutex_destroy(&table->lock);
kfree(table);
}
+void ovs_flow_tbl_put(struct flow_table *table)
+{
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&table->refcnt)) {
+ mutex_lock(&table->lock);
+ table_instance_flow_flush(table,
+ ovs_tbl_dereference(table->ti, table),
+ ovs_tbl_dereference(table->ufid_ti, table));
+ mutex_unlock(&table->lock);
+ call_rcu(&table->rcu, ovs_flow_tbl_destroy_rcu);
+ }
+}
+
struct sw_flow *ovs_flow_tbl_dump_next(struct table_instance *ti,
u32 *bucket, u32 *last)
{
@@ -1060,7 +1088,7 @@ static void flow_key_insert(struct flow_table *table, struct sw_flow *flow)
flow->flow_table.hash = flow_hash(&flow->key, &flow->mask->range);
ti = ovs_tbl_dereference(table->ti, table);
table_instance_insert(ti, flow);
- table->count++;
+ WRITE_ONCE(table->count, table->count + 1);
/* Expand table, if necessary, to make room. */
if (table->count > ti->n_buckets)
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.h b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.h
index 3e5e9845c28a..1b5242a97813 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.h
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.h
@@ -59,7 +59,31 @@ struct table_instance {
u32 hash_seed;
};
+/* Locking:
+ *
+ * flow_table is _not_ protected by ovs_lock (see comment above ovs_mutex
+ * in datapath.c).
+ *
+ * All writes to flow_table are protected by the embedded "lock".
+ * In order to ensure datapath destruction does not trigger the destruction
+ * of the flow_table, "refcnt" is used. Therefore, writers must:
+ * 1 - Enter rcu read-protected section
+ * 2 - Increase "table->refcnt"
+ * 3 - Leave rcu read-protected section (to avoid using mutexes inside rcu)
+ * 4 - Lock "table->lock"
+ * 5 - Perform modifications
+ * 6 - Release "table->lock"
+ * 7 - Decrease "table->refcnt"
+ *
+ * Reads are protected by RCU.
+ *
+ * Note with this schema, it's possible that a flow operation is performed on a
+ * flow_table that is about to be freed.
+ */
struct flow_table {
+ /* Locks flow table writes. */
+ struct mutex lock;
+ refcount_t refcnt;
struct rcu_head rcu;
struct table_instance __rcu *ti;
struct table_instance __rcu *ufid_ti;
@@ -72,11 +96,15 @@ struct flow_table {
extern struct kmem_cache *flow_stats_cache;
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+int lockdep_ovs_tbl_is_held(const struct flow_table *table);
+#else
static inline int lockdep_ovs_tbl_is_held(const struct flow_table *table
__always_unused)
{
return 1;
}
+#endif
#define ASSERT_OVS_TBL(tbl) WARN_ON(!lockdep_ovs_tbl_is_held(tbl))
@@ -95,7 +123,11 @@ struct sw_flow *ovs_flow_alloc(void);
void ovs_flow_free(struct sw_flow *, bool deferred);
struct flow_table *ovs_flow_tbl_alloc(void);
-void ovs_flow_tbl_destroy_rcu(struct rcu_head *table);
+void ovs_flow_tbl_put(struct flow_table *table);
+static inline bool ovs_flow_tbl_get(struct flow_table *table)
+{
+ return refcount_inc_not_zero(&table->refcnt);
+}
int ovs_flow_tbl_count(const struct flow_table *table);
int ovs_flow_tbl_flush(struct flow_table *flow_table);
@@ -125,8 +157,5 @@ void ovs_flow_mask_key(struct sw_flow_key *dst, const struct sw_flow_key *src,
bool full, const struct sw_flow_mask *mask);
void ovs_flow_masks_rebalance(struct flow_table *table);
-void table_instance_flow_flush(struct flow_table *table,
- struct table_instance *ti,
- struct table_instance *ufid_ti);
#endif /* flow_table.h */
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-11 4:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 4:58 [PATCH net-next v4 0/4] net: openvswitch: Decouple flow operations from RTNL Adrian Moreno
2026-06-11 4:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/4] net: openvswitch: make flow_table an rcu pointer Adrian Moreno
2026-06-12 12:32 ` Eelco Chaudron
2026-06-11 4:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/4] net: openvswitch: add per-flow_table lockdep checks Adrian Moreno
2026-06-15 13:55 ` Eelco Chaudron
2026-06-11 4:58 ` Adrian Moreno [this message]
2026-06-15 13:55 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/4] net: openvswitch: decouple flow_table from ovs_mutex Eelco Chaudron
2026-06-11 4:58 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/4] net: openvswitch: avoid double-rcu wait period Adrian Moreno
2026-06-15 13:56 ` Eelco Chaudron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260611045817.1302665-4-amorenoz@redhat.com \
--to=amorenoz@redhat.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox