From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: sam.moelius@trailofbits.com
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
jhs@mojatatu.com, jiri@resnulli.us, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/sched: hhf: clear heavy-hitter state on reset
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 12:13:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611111328.544867-2-horms@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609004937.1240807.c0dcec938172.hhf-reset-stale-classifier@trailofbits.com>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
Full review at: https://sashiko.dev
---
net/sched: hhf: clear heavy-hitter state on reset
This commit clears the heavy-hitter classifier tables when the HHF qdisc
is reset. This prevents packets from being scheduled using flow history
from before the reset operation.
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_hhf.c b/net/sched/sch_hhf.c
> index 96021f52d835b..1698c1b54dec8 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_hhf.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_hhf.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -461,12 +461,34 @@ static struct sk_buff *hhf_dequeue(struct Qdisc *sch)
> return skb;
> }
>
> +static void hhf_reset_classifier(struct hhf_sched_data *q)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < HH_FLOWS_CNT; i++) {
> + struct hh_flow_state *flow, *next;
> + struct list_head *head = &q->hh_flows[i];
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(flow, next, head, flowchain) {
[Severity: High]
If hhf_init() fails due to a memory allocation error, q->hh_flows will be
NULL. When qdisc_create_dflt() cleans up from the error, it calls
qdisc_put() -> __qdisc_destroy(), which unconditionally calls qdisc_reset()
and triggers hhf_reset().
Does the pointer arithmetic here yield a NULL-derived pointer that will
cause a kernel panic when list_for_each_entry_safe() dereferences
head->next?
I noticed hhf_destroy() has a specific check (`if (!q->hh_flows)`) to avoid
this issue during cleanup. Would it make sense to add a similar check here?
> + list_del(&flow->flowchain);
> + kfree(flow);
> + }
> + }
> + WRITE_ONCE(q->hh_flows_current_cnt, 0);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < HHF_ARRAYS_CNT; i++)
> + bitmap_zero(q->hhf_valid_bits[i], HHF_ARRAYS_LEN);
[Severity: High]
Similarly, q->hhf_valid_bits[i] will also be NULL on the initialization error
path.
Because bitmap_zero() internally uses memset(), will passing a NULL
pointer here cause an immediate crash when the cleanup path executes?
> + q->hhf_arrays_reset_timestamp = hhf_time_stamp();
> +}
> +
> static void hhf_reset(struct Qdisc *sch)
[ ... ]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-11 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 0:49 [PATCH] net/sched: hhf: clear heavy-hitter state on reset Samuel Moelius
2026-06-11 11:13 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260611111328.544867-2-horms@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sam.moelius@trailofbits.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox