Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"Mengyuan Lou" <mengyuanlou@net-swift.com>,
	"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Richard Cochran" <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"Jacob Keller" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
	"Michal Swiatkowski" <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Larysa Zaremba" <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>,
	"Joe Damato" <joe@dama.to>, "Breno Leitao" <leitao@debian.org>,
	"Aleksandr Loktionov" <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub)"
	<u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>,
	"Fabio Baltieri" <fabio.baltieri@gmail.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] net: wangxun: implement soft quiesce for PCIe error recovery
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 16:49:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260612154929.GD671640@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610060917.23980-5-jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>

On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 02:09:16PM +0800, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> Function wx_soft_quiesce() provide a lightweight shutdown path during
> PCIe error recovery. It avoids MMIO-dependent operations in PCIe error
> status.
> 
> Waiting for the service task to complete may unnecessarily delay PCIe
> error recovery, especially if the work item is already blocked by the
> hardware failure that triggered AER. So the service task is not
> explicitly cancelled in quiesce path. As a measure to block the service
> task, the checking of WX_STATE_DOWN and WX_STATE_RESETTING is added at
> the entry of every work item.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>

...

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_ptp.c
> index 44f3e6505246..dcc8b3ae1445 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_ptp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_ptp.c
> @@ -842,6 +842,27 @@ void wx_ptp_stop(struct wx *wx)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(wx_ptp_stop);
>  
> +void wx_ptp_quiesce(struct wx *wx)
> +{
> +	if (!test_and_clear_bit(WX_STATE_PTP_RUNNING, wx->state))
> +		return;
> +
> +	clear_bit(WX_FLAG_PTP_PPS_ENABLED, wx->flags);
> +
> +	if (wx->ptp_tx_skb) {
> +		dev_kfree_skb_any(wx->ptp_tx_skb);
> +		wx->ptp_tx_skb = NULL;
> +	}

AI-generated review of this patch on sashiko.dev flags a potential UAF here:

	"Could freeing wx->ptp_tx_skb here cause a use-after-free or
	double-free?

	"Because ptp_clock_unregister() is called after this block, the PTP
	 kworker might still be running.

	"If wx_ptp_tx_hwtstamp() reads wx->ptp_tx_skb just before this
	 free, it will pass the freed skb to skb_tstamp_tx() and call
	 dev_kfree_skb_any() on it again.

I'd appreciate it if you could look into that.

I believe that the other issues raised in that AI-generated review have
already been discussed in the context of earlier versions of this
patch-set.

> +	clear_bit_unlock(WX_STATE_PTP_TX_IN_PROGRESS, wx->state);
> +
> +	if (wx->ptp_clock) {
> +		ptp_clock_unregister(wx->ptp_clock);
> +		wx->ptp_clock = NULL;
> +		dev_info(&wx->pdev->dev, "removed PHC on %s\n", wx->netdev->name);
> +	}
> +}

...

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-12 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-10  6:09 [PATCH net-next v6 0/5] net: wangxun: timeout and error Jiawen Wu
2026-06-10  6:09 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/5] net: ngbe: implement libwx reset ops Jiawen Wu
2026-06-10  6:09 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/5] net: wangxun: add Tx timeout process Jiawen Wu
2026-06-10  6:09 ` [PATCH net-next v6 3/5] net: wangxun: add reinit parameter to wx->do_reset callback Jiawen Wu
2026-06-10  6:09 ` [PATCH net-next v6 4/5] net: wangxun: implement soft quiesce for PCIe error recovery Jiawen Wu
2026-06-12 15:49   ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-06-10  6:09 ` [PATCH net-next v6 5/5] net: wangxun: add pcie error handler Jiawen Wu
2026-06-12 15:41   ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260612154929.GD671640@horms.kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fabio.baltieri@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=jiawenwu@trustnetic.com \
    --cc=joe@dama.to \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mengyuanlou@net-swift.com \
    --cc=michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox