From: Shuhao Tan <tanshuhao@google.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Shuhao Tan <tanshuhao@google.com>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC net-next v1 0/2] Reuse threaded NAPI kthread across napi_del()/napi_add().
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 10:36:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260612173644.380972-1-tanshuhao@google.com> (raw)
Currently the lifetime of the kthread of a threaded NAPI is tied to
the napi_struct. netif_napi_del() stops the kthread when it destroys
the NAPI struct.
This patch series reuses the same kthread (thus preserving all of its
attributes) across napi_del/napi_add. This series now tie the lifetime
of the kthread to net_device instead of napi_struct.
A normal use case for threaded NAPI will be "enable threaded" ->
"configure the thread". Driver reset (that can be caused by a NIC
configuration change) often destroys the configuration and causes a
usability issue. This series aims to solve the issue.
There is a downside of this approach: If a device reduces number of
queues while its NAPIs are threaded. The kthread associated with
removed queues will not be stopped. Since the mapping between the
index passed to napi_add_config() and NAPI is an implementation
detail of individual drivers, it is not straightfoward to perform
a garbage collection and stop kthreads that are no longer associated
with a queue. This patch series tries to minimize the effect by
parking the kthread in napi_del. The kthread still shows up in
/proc, but should not consume CPU cycles.
There was a discussion
https://lore.kernel.org/CAAywjhR0TPKZ-xzqjSP709OVmZWUisDNv2CVc_VxgOrXRtop+g@mail.gmail.com/
around what to do with the kthread between napi_disable/napi_enable.
It seems that there was an intention to keep user configuration for
the kthread across NIC configuration change. This patch series extends
the effort to cover more NIC configuration changes. Roughly tracing
through the call hierarchy of napi_del reveals that at least the
following drivers will not preserve the user configurations:
- idpf: idpf_set_channels(), idpf_set_ringparam()
- mlx4: mlx4_en_set_ringparam(), mlx4_en_set_rxfh(),
mlx4_en_setchannels()
- bnx2: bnx2_set_ringparam(), bnx2_set_channels(), bnx2_change_mtu()
- gve: gve_set_channels(), gve_set_ringparam()
- ena2: ena_set_ringparam(), ena_set_channels()
- (non exhaustive)
These drivers destroy and recreate queues during configuration
changes. If a NAPI was threaded before destruction, during the
creation, a new kthread will be spawned for the NAPI.
Some drivers do not have this problem, e.g. fbnic, netdevsim. But
these drivers and the drivers mentioned above will still lose kthread
during link flap (ndo_stop/ndo_open).
Because the kthreads before and after these configuration changes are
different, all the attributes associated with the kthread are lost.
These include CPU mask, priority, scheduler policy, etc.. If the
threaded state is preserved for a NAPI, it makes sense to want to
preserve the attributes of the thread as well.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/CAAywjhR0TPKZ-xzqjSP709OVmZWUisDNv2CVc_VxgOrXRtop+g@mail.gmail.com/
Shuhao Tan (2):
net: Save kthread of threaded NAPI in napi_config in napi_del and
restore in napi_add
selftests: net: Add kthread preserving test in napi_threaded and
busy_poll_test
include/linux/netdevice.h | 13 +-
net/core/dev.c | 151 ++++++++++++++----
net/core/netdev-genl.c | 12 +-
.../selftests/drivers/net/napi_threaded.py | 41 ++++-
tools/testing/selftests/net/busy_poll_test.sh | 24 +++
5 files changed, 203 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
--
2.54.0.1136.gdb2ca164c4-goog
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-12 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 17:36 Shuhao Tan [this message]
2026-06-12 17:36 ` [RFC net-next v1 1/2] net: Save kthread of threaded NAPI in napi_config in napi_del and restore in napi_add Shuhao Tan
2026-06-12 17:36 ` [RFC net-next v1 2/2] selftests: net: Add kthread preserving test in napi_threaded and busy_poll_test Shuhao Tan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260612173644.380972-1-tanshuhao@google.com \
--to=tanshuhao@google.com \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox