From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: Matthieu Buffet <matthieu@buffet.re>
Cc: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
"Mikhail Ivanov" <ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com>,
konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com, "Tingmao Wang" <m@maowtm.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] landlock: Add UDP send+connect access control
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2026 22:55:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260613.aiteizei1aiJ@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611162107.49278-3-matthieu@buffet.re>
A few issues were identified by Sashiko:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260611162107.49278-1-matthieu%40buffet.re
I squashed this patch:
diff --git a/security/landlock/net.c b/security/landlock/net.c
index 9273cdbbf844..b12568666a9e 100644
--- a/security/landlock/net.c
+++ b/security/landlock/net.c
@@ -261,10 +261,17 @@ static int current_check_access_socket(struct socket *const sock,
static int current_check_autobind_udp_socket(struct socket *const sock)
{
+ const struct access_masks bind_udp = {
+ .net = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP,
+ };
struct sockaddr_storage port0 = {};
unsigned short num;
bool slow;
+ /* Quick return for non-Landlocked tasks. */
+ if (!landlock_get_applicable_subject(current_cred(), bind_udp, NULL))
+ return 0;
+
/*
* On UDP sockets, if a local port has not already been bound, calling
* connect() or sending a first datagram has the side effect of
@@ -287,8 +294,7 @@ static int current_check_autobind_udp_socket(struct socket *const sock)
port0.ss_family = READ_ONCE(sock->sk->sk_family);
return current_check_access_socket(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&port0,
- sizeof(port0),
- LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP, false);
+ sizeof(port0), bind_udp.net, false);
}
static int hook_socket_bind(struct socket *const sock,
@@ -328,7 +334,9 @@ static int hook_socket_connect(struct socket *const sock,
* connect()ing to an AF_UNSPEC address does not trigger an autobind and
* should never be restricted.
*/
- if (ret == 0 && sk_is_udp(sock->sk) && address->sa_family != AF_UNSPEC)
+ if (ret == 0 && sk_is_udp(sock->sk) &&
+ addrlen >= offsetofend(typeof(*address), sa_family) &&
+ address->sa_family != AF_UNSPEC)
ret = current_check_autobind_udp_socket(sock);
return ret;
We might want to factor out some code, but that should be good for now.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 06:21:02PM +0200, Matthieu Buffet wrote:
> Add support for a second fine-grained UDP access right.
> LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP controls the ability to set the
> remote port of a socket (via connect()) and to specify an explicit
> destination when sending a datagram, to override any remote peer set on
> a UDP socket (e.g. in sendto() or sendmsg()).
> It will be useful for applications that send datagrams, and for some
> servers too (those creating per-client sockets, which want to receive
> traffic only from a specific address).
>
> Similarly as for bind(), this access control is performed when
> configuring sockets, not in hot code paths.
>
> Add detection of when autobind is about to be required, and deny the
> operation if the process would not be allowed to call bind(0)
> explicitly. Autobind can only be performed in udp_lib_get_port() from
> code paths already controlled by LSM hooks: when connect()ing,
> sending a first datagram, and in some splice() EOF edge case which,
> afaiu, can only happen after a remote peer has been set. This invariant
> needs to be preserved to keep bind policies actually enforced.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Buffet <matthieu@buffet.re>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/landlock.h | 23 ++++
> security/landlock/audit.c | 2 +
> security/landlock/limits.h | 2 +-
> security/landlock/net.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++---
> tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c | 5 +-
> 5 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h b/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> index 045b251ff1b4..b147223efc97 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h
> @@ -378,11 +378,34 @@ struct landlock_net_port_attr {
> *
> * - %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP: Bind UDP sockets to the given local
> * port. Support added in Landlock ABI version 10.
> + * - %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP: Set the remote port of UDP
> + * sockets to the given port, or send datagrams to the given remote port
> + * ignoring any destination pre-set on a socket. Support added in
> + * Landlock ABI version 10.
> + *
> + * .. note:: Setting a remote address or sending a first datagram
> + * auto-binds UDP sockets to an ephemeral local source port if not
> + * already bound. To allow this if both %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP
> + * and %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP are handled, you need to
> + * either:
> + *
> + * - use a socket already bound to a port before the ruleset started
> + * being enforced;
> + * - or grant %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP on port 0, meaning "any
> + * port in the ephemeral port range";
> + * - or grant %LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP on a specific port, and
> + * call :manpage:`bind(2)` on that port before trying to
> + * :manpage:`connect(2)` or send datagrams.
> + *
> + * .. note:: Sending datagrams to an ``AF_UNSPEC`` destination address
> + * family is not supported for IPv6 UDP sockets: you will need to use a
> + * ``NULL`` address instead.
> */
> /* clang-format off */
> #define LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP (1ULL << 0)
> #define LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP (1ULL << 1)
> #define LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP (1ULL << 2)
> +#define LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP (1ULL << 3)
> /* clang-format on */
>
> /**
> diff --git a/security/landlock/audit.c b/security/landlock/audit.c
> index e676ebffeebe..851647197a01 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/audit.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/audit.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static const char *const net_access_strings[] = {
> [BIT_INDEX(LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP)] = "net.bind_tcp",
> [BIT_INDEX(LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP)] = "net.connect_tcp",
> [BIT_INDEX(LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP)] = "net.bind_udp",
> + [BIT_INDEX(LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP)] =
> + "net.connect_send_udp",
> };
>
> static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(net_access_strings) == LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_NET);
> diff --git a/security/landlock/limits.h b/security/landlock/limits.h
> index c0f30a4591b8..a4d908b240a2 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/limits.h
> +++ b/security/landlock/limits.h
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
> #define LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS ((LANDLOCK_LAST_ACCESS_FS << 1) - 1)
> #define LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS __const_hweight64(LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS)
>
> -#define LANDLOCK_LAST_ACCESS_NET LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP
> +#define LANDLOCK_LAST_ACCESS_NET LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP
> #define LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_NET ((LANDLOCK_LAST_ACCESS_NET << 1) - 1)
> #define LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_NET __const_hweight64(LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_NET)
>
> diff --git a/security/landlock/net.c b/security/landlock/net.c
> index 8da40614c452..0e697403eca9 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/net.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/net.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,8 @@ int landlock_append_net_rule(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
> static int current_check_access_socket(struct socket *const sock,
> struct sockaddr *const address,
> const int addrlen,
> - access_mask_t access_request)
> + access_mask_t access_request,
> + bool connecting)
> {
> unsigned short sock_family;
> __be16 port;
> @@ -75,19 +76,51 @@ static int current_check_access_socket(struct socket *const sock,
>
> switch (address->sa_family) {
> case AF_UNSPEC:
> - if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP) {
> + if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP ||
> + (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP &&
> + connecting)) {
> /*
> * Connecting to an address with AF_UNSPEC dissolves
> - * the TCP association, which have the same effect as
> - * closing the connection while retaining the socket
> - * object (i.e., the file descriptor). As for dropping
> - * privileges, closing connections is always allowed.
> - *
> - * For a TCP access control system, this request is
> - * legitimate. Let the network stack handle potential
> + * the remote association while retaining the socket
> + * object (i.e., the file descriptor). For TCP, it has
> + * the same effect as closing the connection. For UDP,
> + * it removes any preset remote address. As for
> + * dropping privileges, these actions are always
> + * allowed.
> + * Let the network stack handle potential
> * inconsistencies and return -EINVAL if needed.
> */
> return 0;
> + } else if (access_request ==
> + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP) {
> + if (sock_family == AF_INET6) {
> + /*
> + * We cannot allow sending UDP datagrams to an
> + * explicit AF_UNSPEC address on IPv6 sockets,
> + * even if AF_UNSPEC is treated as "no address"
> + * on such sockets (so it should always be allowed).
> + * That's because the socket's family can change under
> + * our feet (if another thread calls setsockopt(IPV6_ADDRFORM))
> + * to IPv4, which would then treat AF_UNSPEC as
> + * AF_INET.
> + */
> + audit_net.family = AF_UNSPEC;
> + audit_net.sk = sock->sk;
> + landlock_init_layer_masks(
> + subject->domain, access_request,
> + &layer_masks, LANDLOCK_KEY_NET_PORT);
> + landlock_log_denial(
> + subject,
> + &(struct landlock_request){
> + .type = LANDLOCK_REQUEST_NET_ACCESS,
> + .audit.type =
> + LSM_AUDIT_DATA_NET,
> + .audit.u.net = &audit_net,
> + .access = access_request,
> + .layer_masks = &layer_masks,
> + });
> + return -EACCES;
> + }
> } else if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP ||
> access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP) {
> /*
> @@ -130,7 +163,11 @@ static int current_check_access_socket(struct socket *const sock,
> } else {
> WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> }
> - /* Only for bind(AF_UNSPEC+INADDR_ANY) on IPv4 socket. */
> + /*
> + * AF_UNSPEC is treated as AF_INET only in
> + * bind(AF_UNSPEC+INADDR_ANY) on IPv4 sockets and
> + * when sending to AF_UNSPEC addresses on IPv4 sockets.
> + */
> fallthrough;
> case AF_INET: {
> const struct sockaddr_in *addr4;
> @@ -141,7 +178,8 @@ static int current_check_access_socket(struct socket *const sock,
> addr4 = (struct sockaddr_in *)address;
> port = addr4->sin_port;
>
> - if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP) {
> + if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP ||
> + access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP) {
> audit_net.dport = port;
> audit_net.v4info.daddr = addr4->sin_addr.s_addr;
> } else if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP ||
> @@ -164,7 +202,8 @@ static int current_check_access_socket(struct socket *const sock,
> addr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)address;
> port = addr6->sin6_port;
>
> - if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP) {
> + if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP ||
> + access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP) {
> audit_net.dport = port;
> audit_net.v6info.daddr = addr6->sin6_addr;
> } else if (access_request == LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP ||
> @@ -221,6 +260,38 @@ static int current_check_access_socket(struct socket *const sock,
> return -EACCES;
> }
>
> +static int current_check_autobind_udp_socket(struct socket *const sock)
> +{
> + struct sockaddr_storage port0 = {};
> + unsigned short num;
> + bool slow;
> +
> + /*
> + * On UDP sockets, if a local port has not already been bound,
> + * calling connect() or sending a first datagram has the side
> + * effect of autobinding an ephemeral port: we also have to check
> + * that the process would have had the right to bind(0) explicitly.
> + * Hold the socket lock around the inet_num read to exclude
> + * udp_lib_get_port()'s transient inet_num = snum write that is
> + * reverted to 0 on a failing reuseport bind.
> + */
> + slow = lock_sock_fast(sock->sk);
> + num = inet_sk(sock->sk)->inet_num;
> + unlock_sock_fast(sock->sk, slow);
> + if (num != 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * Construct a struct sockaddr* with port 0 to pretend the
> + * process tried to bind() on that address.
> + */
> + port0.ss_family = READ_ONCE(sock->sk->sk_family);
> +
> + return current_check_access_socket(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&port0,
> + sizeof(port0),
> + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP, false);
> +}
> +
> static int hook_socket_bind(struct socket *const sock,
> struct sockaddr *const address, const int addrlen)
> {
> @@ -234,7 +305,7 @@ static int hook_socket_bind(struct socket *const sock,
> return 0;
>
> return current_check_access_socket(sock, address, addrlen,
> - access_request);
> + access_request, false);
> }
>
> static int hook_socket_connect(struct socket *const sock,
> @@ -242,19 +313,55 @@ static int hook_socket_connect(struct socket *const sock,
> const int addrlen)
> {
> access_mask_t access_request;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> if (sk_is_tcp(sock->sk))
> access_request = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP;
> + else if (sk_is_udp(sock->sk))
> + access_request = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP;
> else
> return 0;
>
> - return current_check_access_socket(sock, address, addrlen,
> - access_request);
> + ret = current_check_access_socket(sock, address, addrlen,
> + access_request, true);
> +
> + /*
> + * connect()ing to an AF_UNSPEC address does not trigger an
> + * autobind and should never be restricted.
> + */
> + if (ret == 0 && sk_is_udp(sock->sk) && address->sa_family != AF_UNSPEC)
> + ret = current_check_autobind_udp_socket(sock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int hook_socket_sendmsg(struct socket *const sock,
> + struct msghdr *const msg, const int size)
> +{
> + struct sockaddr *const address = msg->msg_name;
> + const int addrlen = msg->msg_namelen;
> + access_mask_t access_request;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (sk_is_udp(sock->sk))
> + access_request = LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP;
> + else
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (address != NULL)
> + ret = current_check_access_socket(sock, address, addrlen,
> + access_request, false);
> +
> + if (ret == 0)
> + ret = current_check_autobind_udp_socket(sock);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static struct security_hook_list landlock_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(socket_bind, hook_socket_bind),
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(socket_connect, hook_socket_connect),
> + LSM_HOOK_INIT(socket_sendmsg, hook_socket_sendmsg),
> };
>
> __init void landlock_add_net_hooks(void)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c
> index ec392d971ea3..016c7277e370 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c
> @@ -1326,12 +1326,13 @@ FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(mini)
>
> /* clang-format off */
>
> -#define ACCESS_LAST LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP
> +#define ACCESS_LAST LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP
>
> #define ACCESS_ALL ( \
> LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_TCP | \
> LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_TCP | \
> - LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP)
> + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_BIND_UDP | \
> + LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_CONNECT_SEND_UDP)
>
> /* clang-format on */
>
> --
> 2.47.3
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-13 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 16:21 [PATCH v5 0/6] landlock: Add UDP access control support Matthieu Buffet
2026-06-11 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] landlock: Add UDP bind() access control Matthieu Buffet
2026-06-11 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] landlock: Add UDP send+connect " Matthieu Buffet
2026-06-13 20:55 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2026-06-11 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] selftests/landlock: Add tests for UDP bind/connect Matthieu Buffet
2026-06-11 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] selftests/landlock: Add tests for UDP send Matthieu Buffet
2026-06-11 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] samples/landlock: Add sandboxer UDP access control Matthieu Buffet
2026-06-11 16:21 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] landlock: Add documentation for UDP support Matthieu Buffet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260613.aiteizei1aiJ@digikod.net \
--to=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com \
--cc=konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m@maowtm.org \
--cc=matthieu@buffet.re \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox