From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF98D38DF9; Sat, 13 Jun 2026 18:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781375585; cv=none; b=MXsNqtxsIvVkiNfx+P8czArHT3HYdQqea98S53MmAta/7sN0ho0QXry2slNF2h3EJrnd+5zpXkPUUFeoqE8q75S9fAc4Rqi+8XRHneUEwDPcDpp5jP0YkkNoMg50zhHUPtmRwIwdr0gZkD4UEcNQBhQ0jEd5xoHdqWdRlJdJNpc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781375585; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yOW1T1jI9R3lcErTj0NvMwYkX0MWbRLw3YOmNJRO3O0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=k3CvVQvpXo4VEPGKgp3AfVcnOKTIqHwIjKxocNc5FbaiCdGxLQWpQ+2puPqytshBmlwmzMcKXq8olasxdZUVaMdxtj3Y6ntB9RHWqSVcm1jgAWp60bgHaVxJJffun6Ndv+Mzu0TePBb19zy3KpHzdD0TxVtD88kz2gQNaWGoxYY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WWH5j2Ie; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WWH5j2Ie" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEE021F000E9; Sat, 13 Jun 2026 18:33:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1781375584; bh=mp30tNqRfK4Zo9AUlCqB1todNLWmHa6GmIIRAZsl2kA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=WWH5j2IeOfr7qkLo+wELTxTqWnL9XBQV/ZrhkUpio9pYgrHeVMOXgu/2lhTzU6jYN gZ9VIR0CklvtNogLK7+5eEZjkSPV132GIc+/gDP6J60EgfWtGBrCPwuOXrXfSiohm1 pvx1148fro5ST4PnJe7JjPl19lTYUEzqmWilRDEy54nVg6Y26huMM6HH6K5Ck0I9Ki dNUbEyEVW155apszFZ5nOVerqJ9cwozTC+C0T2GPbr8dHBv/Knqf4/SdIsy9hjojSf sm5pyyxho878EZYEL8pdRr7GPRVuofDdOs2+UjaqzZ2iQXE2rJr0sMoBjB+oLev3xP A1EVBArekuPxg== Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2026 11:33:03 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Pedro Falcato Cc: Vlastimil Babka , Harry Yoo , Andrew Morton , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hao Li , Christoph Lameter , David Rientjes , Roman Gushchin , Simon Horman , Jason Xing , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Kees Cook Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] net: isolate SKB data area allocations Message-ID: <20260613113303.7562bc59@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260611124642.345400-1-pfalcato@suse.de> References: <20260611124642.345400-1-pfalcato@suse.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 11 Jun 2026 13:46:40 +0100 Pedro Falcato wrote: > Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] net: isolate SKB data area allocations This doesn't apply to net-next, does patch 2 not apply to mm? If neither tree can take both - maybe MM can take the first patch by itself and we will queue patch 2 after the changes propagate during the merge window?