From: Sechang Lim <rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com>
To: "D . Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>,
Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>,
Sidraya Jayagond <sidraya@linux.ibm.com>,
Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Mahanta Jambigi <mjambigi@linux.ibm.com>,
Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>,
Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>,
Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>,
Guvenc Gulce <guvenc@linux.ibm.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] net/smc: fix out-of-bounds read in smc_clcsock_data_ready()
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2026 12:09:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260614120931.4041687-1-rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com> (raw)
smc_clcsock_data_ready() is installed on the listen socket and reads its
sk_user_data as an smc_sock. A passive-open child inherits this callback,
but sk_clone_lock() clears the child's sk_user_data because it is tagged
SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY. smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock() restores the child's af_ops,
but the inherited sk_data_ready() is left in place until accept.
In that window the child is established. A cgroup sock_ops program can run
bpf_sock_hash_update() on it from tcp_init_transfer(); sk_psock_init()
stores a sk_psock in the NULL sk_user_data. The inherited callback then
reads sk_user_data via smc_clcsock_user_data(), which masks only
SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY, mistakes the sk_psock for an smc_sock, and reads a
callback pointer past the end of the sk_psock:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in smc_clcsock_data_ready+0x84/0x200 net/smc/af_smc.c:2637
Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880013b8674 by task syz.6.12484/67930
<IRQ>
smc_clcsock_data_ready+0x84/0x200 net/smc/af_smc.c:2637
tcp_urg+0x24d/0x360 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6264
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x280d/0x4940 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:7336
tcp_child_process+0x371/0xa50 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:1002
tcp_v4_rcv+0x1eaa/0x2a00 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2186
ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x226/0x420 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:207
ip_local_deliver_finish+0x35a/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:241
__netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x1e5/0x210 net/core/dev.c:6216
process_backlog+0x631/0x1470 net/core/dev.c:6682
__napi_poll+0xb3/0x320 net/core/dev.c:7749
net_rx_action+0x4fa/0xcb0 net/core/dev.c:7969
handle_softirqs+0x236/0x800 kernel/softirq.c:622
</IRQ>
Allocated by task 67930:
sk_psock_init+0x142/0x740 net/core/skmsg.c:766
sock_map_link+0x646/0xdf0 net/core/sock_map.c:279
sock_hash_update_common+0xd3/0x990 net/core/sock_map.c:1010
bpf_sock_hash_update+0x114/0x170 net/core/sock_map.c:1229
__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_ops+0x74/0xa0 kernel/bpf/cgroup.c:1727
tcp_init_transfer+0x1085/0x1100 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6693
tcp_rcv_state_process+0x241e/0x4940 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:7231
tcp_child_process+0x371/0xa50 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:1002
Restore the inherited sk_data_ready() in smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock(), where the
child's sk_user_data is already cleared, rather than only at accept.
Fixes: a60a2b1e0af1 ("net/smc: reduce active tcp_listen workers")
Signed-off-by: Sechang Lim <rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com>
---
net/smc/af_smc.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index b5db69073e20..152971e8ad17 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -156,6 +156,12 @@ static struct sock *smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock(const struct sock *sk,
if (child) {
rcu_assign_sk_user_data(child, NULL);
+ /*
+ * the child inherited the listen-specific sk_data_ready();
+ * restore it here, as sk_user_data may be reused before accept
+ */
+ child->sk_data_ready = smc->clcsk_data_ready;
+
/* v4-mapped sockets don't inherit parent ops. Don't restore. */
if (inet_csk(child)->icsk_af_ops == inet_csk(sk)->icsk_af_ops)
inet_csk(child)->icsk_af_ops = smc->ori_af_ops;
--
2.43.0
reply other threads:[~2026-06-14 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260614120931.4041687-1-rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com \
--to=rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=guvenc@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjambigi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sidraya@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ubraun@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox