From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: Wongi Lee <qw3rtyp0@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
asml.silence@gmail.com, dhowells@redhat.com, willemb@google.com,
Jungwoo Lee <jwlee2217@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 1/2] ipv4: account for fraggap on the paged allocation path
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 10:32:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260615073202.GB338677@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aiq491nYg2Qf/f1N@DESKTOP-19IMU7U.localdomain>
On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 10:32:39PM +0900, Wongi Lee wrote:
> In __ip_append_data(), when the paged-allocation branch is taken,
> alloclen and pagedlen are computed as
>
> alloclen = fragheaderlen + transhdrlen;
> pagedlen = datalen - transhdrlen;
>
> datalen already includes fraggap, but the fraggap bytes carried over
> from the previous skb are copied into the new skb's linear area at
> offset transhdrlen by the subsequent skb_copy_and_csum_bits(). The
> linear area is therefore undersized by fraggap bytes while pagedlen is
> overstated by the same amount.
>
> The non-paged branch sets alloclen to fraglen, which already accounts
> for fraggap because datalen does. Bring the paged branch in line by
> adding fraggap to alloclen and subtracting it from pagedlen.
>
> After this adjustment, copy no longer collapses to -fraggap on the
> paged path, so remove the stale comment describing that old arithmetic.
>
> Fixes: 8eb77cc73977 ("ipv4: avoid partial copy for zc")
> Signed-off-by: Jungwoo Lee <jwlee2217@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wongi Lee <qw3rtyp0@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 13:26 [PATCH net v3 0/2] ipv4/ipv6: account for fraggap on paged allocation paths Wongi Lee
2026-06-11 13:32 ` [PATCH net v3 1/2] ipv4: account for fraggap on the paged allocation path Wongi Lee
2026-06-15 7:32 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2026-06-11 13:34 ` [PATCH net v3 2/2] ipv6: " Wongi Lee
2026-06-15 7:30 ` Ido Schimmel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260615073202.GB338677@shredder \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jwlee2217@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=qw3rtyp0@gmail.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox