Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, marcelo.leitner@gmail.com, w@1wt.eu,
	zdi-disclosures@trendmicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: hold socket lock when dumping endpoints in sctp_diag
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 08:24:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616072408.GR712698@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADvbK_e062WLNVy+BbuNTNoJGBvQBR7PHp_BmxLwwSGq4O9_dw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 02:24:34PM -0400, Xin Long wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 7:04 AM Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
> > email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
> > Full review at: https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/

...

> Low: #1, #2, #5, not really issues,
> but worth mentioning about it in changelog.
> 
> Critical: #3, not valid.
> socket refcnt can't be 0 when traversing the chain under read_lock_bh().
> 
> But it seems better to hold ep instead sk, and also to check
> ep->base.dead instead of sk_state CLOSED.
> 
> Medium: #4, not valid.
> it's completely okay to dump duplicate or skip socks because of
> concurrent close() and listen() in diag.
> 
> will post v2 with some improvements mentioned above.

Thanks, much appreciated.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-16  7:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-12 17:59 [PATCH net] sctp: hold socket lock when dumping endpoints in sctp_diag Xin Long
2026-06-13  7:10 ` Willy Tarreau
2026-06-15 19:13   ` Xin Long
2026-06-15 11:04 ` Simon Horman
2026-06-15 18:24   ` Xin Long
2026-06-16  7:24     ` Simon Horman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260616072408.GR712698@horms.kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=zdi-disclosures@trendmicro.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox