From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7CD1378826 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 20:19:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781641148; cv=none; b=dnZ3q7Hqn1/8JB0B8iAcx54FryWoFBR7ctngSMektw6DBQ1r22KiH2noap7XOf4kp1ELxoaxiY3aJQYzlTSCDZIHD9JVbKvavJHOVAJHMwt/vnt8Q6bDwwNlPL0z/qSW7JqH7UJ9wNlXzTZVXpYIsCbXvUkjDA3jzrX1IjGpDY4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781641148; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZQumMHxrTNTS76WJKpYqSc08gwtx7rqu3YrU8AEhN7U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sKfl6aA948iE0Q0sBWkrjl7WDmXoi/3QWpCOsmesiqFwi75FnTwmMjTqf7gYTpJJH+eVnPzprZgIYo4ui2s0hY6HJ/j2/Mj8MaUhcfy+m0dJiyu4a73mRBtZ+6WGtWoRKxPtBEzrIJMPvg4oUzmWsUuJLsiWgEQnUKRuV+ALR3k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=m2Ze3Nqr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="m2Ze3Nqr" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1781641144; x=1813177144; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ZQumMHxrTNTS76WJKpYqSc08gwtx7rqu3YrU8AEhN7U=; b=m2Ze3NqrzAgHDt36uKzC0kLrnIGZvd1eoRzlVGngRCluA+iu1iDbChiz mQpOSzI2El5aXPbgtg0eNn0O65QJHjphjKWluUGRMdA6TvtdLdOZmMDom ECYvFtksesgBrt97dHSIKRA683J1+QwNDrWyLBH+k6Zkaiwov4NtC3h9g Jwu6xTC61gbUyTbQB+e9XC7JFXytlZoNgw5irxg3TkcP/qA3lTSBf5UZY l9wiecEf1f3ezpD+c/mNm9EUTj/3jAIrYZ1GmQcu0c6BNdSgdOiTItODP cmYjCmH3LuEtXJ+zS9kEmmMb5tvVNjXp9jWgDCT8qfGki2KEWRr6+2Owa w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: iv4facG0RyKXAYCr4FqP4w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: c92TN8PgQiCvWGMcCETdKA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11819"; a="92744728" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,208,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="92744728" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jun 2026 13:19:04 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: zTrHQPL/TL2Y9+7eSsJv5A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: GQLbJOLPQc6kdvUO4GXLtQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,208,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="271945306" Received: from igk-lkp-server01.igk.intel.com (HELO 892db79562d4) ([10.211.93.152]) by fmviesa001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jun 2026 13:19:02 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 892db79562d4 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wZaFQ-000000005B3-12Qh; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 20:19:00 +0000 Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 22:18:27 +0200 From: kernel test robot To: Robert Malz , anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ice: retry reading NVM if admin queue returns EBUSY Message-ID: <202606162237.EIrFZKip-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260616104521.1545053-1-robert.malz@canonical.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260616104521.1545053-1-robert.malz@canonical.com> Hi Robert, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on tnguy-next-queue/dev-queue] [also build test ERROR on tnguy-net-queue/dev-queue linus/master v7.1 next-20260616] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Robert-Malz/ice-retry-reading-NVM-if-admin-queue-returns-EBUSY/20260616-185349 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tnguy/next-queue.git dev-queue patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260616104521.1545053-1-robert.malz%40canonical.com patch subject: [PATCH] ice: retry reading NVM if admin queue returns EBUSY config: x86_64-rhel-9.4 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260616/202606162237.EIrFZKip-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260616/202606162237.EIrFZKip-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606162237.EIrFZKip-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_nvm.c: In function 'ice_read_flat_nvm': >> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_nvm.c:101:58: error: 'ICE_AQ_RC_EBUSY' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LIBIE_AQ_RC_EBUSY'? 101 | if (hw->adminq.sq_last_status != ICE_AQ_RC_EBUSY || | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | LIBIE_AQ_RC_EBUSY drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_nvm.c:101:58: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in vim +101 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_nvm.c 48 49 /** 50 * ice_read_flat_nvm - Read portion of NVM by flat offset 51 * @hw: pointer to the HW struct 52 * @offset: offset from beginning of NVM 53 * @length: (in) number of bytes to read; (out) number of bytes actually read 54 * @data: buffer to return data in (sized to fit the specified length) 55 * @read_shadow_ram: if true, read from shadow RAM instead of NVM 56 * 57 * Reads a portion of the NVM, as a flat memory space. This function correctly 58 * breaks read requests across Shadow RAM sectors and ensures that no single 59 * read request exceeds the maximum 4KB read for a single AdminQ command. 60 * 61 * Returns a status code on failure. Note that the data pointer may be 62 * partially updated if some reads succeed before a failure. 63 */ 64 int 65 ice_read_flat_nvm(struct ice_hw *hw, u32 offset, u32 *length, u8 *data, 66 bool read_shadow_ram) 67 { 68 u32 inlen = *length; 69 u32 bytes_read = 0; 70 int retry_cnt = 0; 71 bool last_cmd; 72 int status; 73 74 *length = 0; 75 76 /* Verify the length of the read if this is for the Shadow RAM */ 77 if (read_shadow_ram && ((offset + inlen) > (hw->flash.sr_words * 2u))) { 78 ice_debug(hw, ICE_DBG_NVM, "NVM error: requested offset is beyond Shadow RAM limit\n"); 79 return -EINVAL; 80 } 81 82 do { 83 u32 read_size, sector_offset; 84 85 /* ice_aq_read_nvm cannot read more than 4KB at a time. 86 * Additionally, a read from the Shadow RAM may not cross over 87 * a sector boundary. Conveniently, the sector size is also 88 * 4KB. 89 */ 90 sector_offset = offset % ICE_AQ_MAX_BUF_LEN; 91 read_size = min_t(u32, ICE_AQ_MAX_BUF_LEN - sector_offset, 92 inlen - bytes_read); 93 94 last_cmd = !(bytes_read + read_size < inlen); 95 96 status = ice_aq_read_nvm(hw, ICE_AQC_NVM_START_POINT, 97 offset, read_size, 98 data + bytes_read, last_cmd, 99 read_shadow_ram, NULL); 100 if (status) { > 101 if (hw->adminq.sq_last_status != ICE_AQ_RC_EBUSY || 102 retry_cnt > ICE_SQ_SEND_MAX_EXECUTE) 103 break; 104 ice_debug(hw, ICE_DBG_NVM, 105 "NVM read EBUSY error, retry %d\n", 106 retry_cnt + 1); 107 last_cmd = false; 108 ice_release_nvm(hw); 109 msleep(ICE_SQ_SEND_DELAY_TIME_MS); 110 status = ice_acquire_nvm(hw, ICE_RES_READ); 111 if (status) 112 break; 113 retry_cnt++; 114 } else { 115 bytes_read += read_size; 116 offset += read_size; 117 retry_cnt = 0; 118 } 119 } while (!last_cmd); 120 121 *length = bytes_read; 122 return status; 123 } 124 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki