From: Ziran Zhang <zhangcoder@yeah.net>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ziran Zhang <zhangcoder@yeah.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rocker: Fix memory leak in ofdpa_port_fdb()
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 09:37:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260617013752.5820-1-zhangcoder@yeah.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446e974-0df0-4956-b2af-7a9403da3c8d@intel.com>
On Tue, 16 Jun 2026 16:29:59 -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
> I looked at the surrounding code and I can't find any other place that
> would have released the found entry, so this does indeed look like a
> memory leak.
>
> You could potentially verify it using the slab allocator stats and
> setting up a test where you add and remove port fdb in succession and
> see if the allocation of the correct size continue to grow.
>
> This whole flow is somewhat confusing by combining both the add and
> remove into a single functional flow. I guess it is intended to reduce
> code duplication but it sure makes the processes difficult to follow.
>
> I suspect the original code mistook freeing the searched entry as
> freeing the found entry.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
I don't have Rocker hardware to test the suggestion.
Thanks for the review!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-17 1:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 1:32 [PATCH] rocker: Fix memory leak in ofdpa_port_fdb() Ziran Zhang
2026-06-16 23:29 ` Jacob Keller
2026-06-17 1:37 ` Ziran Zhang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260617013752.5820-1-zhangcoder@yeah.net \
--to=zhangcoder@yeah.net \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox