From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: ioana.ciornei@nxp.com
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
f.fainelli@gmail.com, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] dpaa2-switch: fix VLAN upper check not rejecting bridge join
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 12:45:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260617114518.857486-1-horms@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616105430.3725910-1-ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>
This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
Full review at: https://sashiko.dev
---
dpaa2-switch: fix VLAN upper check not rejecting bridge join
The blamed commit refactored the prechangeupper event handling but
failed to actually return an error in case
dpaa2_switch_prevent_bridging_with_8021q_upper() detected a 802.1q upper
on a port which tries to join a bridge. Fix this by returning err
instead of 0.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-switch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-switch.c
> index 52c1cb9cb7e02..46ae81c2fa013 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-switch.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-switch.c
> @@ -2177,7 +2177,7 @@ dpaa2_switch_prechangeupper_sanity_checks(struct net_device *netdev,
> if (err) {
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
> "Cannot join a bridge while VLAN uppers are present");
> - return 0;
> + return err;
[Severity: High]
If a user adds an 802.1q VLAN upper device to a port after it has already
successfully joined a bridge, won't this check trigger when the port leaves
the bridge?
In drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-switch.c,
dpaa2_switch_prechangeupper_sanity_checks() is called for both bridge joins
and unlinks from dpaa2_switch_port_prechangeupper():
err = dpaa2_switch_prechangeupper_sanity_checks(netdev, upper_dev, extack);
if (err)
return err;
if (!info->linking)
dpaa2_switch_port_pre_bridge_leave(netdev);
Since returning an error aborts the notifier chain, an unlink notification
would fail this check, preventing dpaa2_switch_port_pre_bridge_leave() from
running. Does this lead to state inconsistency and skipped switchdev
unoffloads?
Could this check be guarded so it only runs when info->linking is true?
> }
>
> netdev_for_each_lower_dev(upper_dev, other_dev, iter) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-17 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 10:54 [PATCH net] dpaa2-switch: fix VLAN upper check not rejecting bridge join Ioana Ciornei
2026-06-17 11:45 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-06-17 15:01 ` Ioana Ciornei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260617114518.857486-1-horms@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=ioana.ciornei@nxp.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox