From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 763233B14B8; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 22:07:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781734067; cv=none; b=Qr6RTaT/C+4W+sFXq1DqjYvgmk1LECeI3iR8eQQluRrZRTgahHSB+RBdwL4duYKtzBlJDZBBMTj3KR/Hq9ljbIjb9UL3BDhuw3roCK+pwhjiq27kxB51Z6gqspabzNpOF8AZ1hCMeYm0sDyl0GfnoHBtp0nMHZ5KMsDB8/d6fpo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781734067; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QD9+BuX8vNnlpmK7MBUF8BffYmSDp+kgIN1GCWUfQ4c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=k4PkSoSFXIkf7geygyDP3b898ZXPygrC2mhuqUbGl7OZpTwKfSwghq/sEKNv955i9tEMlPrk2K8ozrjyL0SWTNcTdjgwGuUhbjdlVCnPWLoh8qZsJcdJdkKuQbhV2iHCzCF1mAKIiyQpttZrZFSnlCTU8wRMIj5eji4is4cbQ/s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XNxowSn0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XNxowSn0" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7BE301F000E9; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 22:07:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1781734066; bh=CqN76L0GmoGTlUxyqmYpYwkQVk5OIJLansyMs93EdPk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=XNxowSn0OJP7I2CIW2JV0Oo+0Rb+Kin3QNSOcQuHP6QKaSXwJYNG4kFgHdWzc6Kdf 2pVYVBMVbEft9I+hqRuLM45mXxtDKkIrE16UXxKkNjSPtiG0cNyVdWldzciE/3B/Lg dxmDRcDjInvW5G/O+L5ZZ2G8zkczw4R31UbnwJ/UclDCiyAl0ng5d7bpd777pgunfq wEI2dW2j+0XDGEpTVhUup+ZP8N7/EzprERi1gqb9r29KVHngQmWAiFWLOLK0y/EQo+ sQc92qNEXX27qZIhquXOuI/QZ49TFfmsRnXHvh5qclJjht0ry/VefZz5qfZQLLtCR2 qWca2TTAx2Y6A== Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 15:07:44 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jacob Keller Cc: , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , "Paolo Abeni" , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: loongson1: Use dev_err_probe() Message-ID: <20260617150744.05756f0b@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <6b8db599-5bb2-47f9-ab53-a0b5141af2e5@intel.com> References: <20260615-dwmac-loongson1-v1-1-cbcf5bc01d9b@gmail.com> <31630db0-85cb-421b-8ebe-bbae07521533@intel.com> <20260617135407.6ff54e27@kernel.org> <6b8db599-5bb2-47f9-ab53-a0b5141af2e5@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 17 Jun 2026 14:26:25 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote: > It does claim that it has benefit since you get the error code emitted > symbolically. But we have %pe for that. I wonder if dev_err_probe > predates %pe? I'd argue No of match data provided: -EINVAL is more confusing than just: No of match data provided the EINVAL is meaningless and hardcoded in this case?