Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
	Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Corey Leavitt <corey@leavitt.info>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de>
Subject: [PATCH net] net: pse-pd: scope pse_control regulator handle to kref lifetime
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 21:28:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260622192839.2508733-1-github@szelinsky.de> (raw)

From: Corey Leavitt <corey@leavitt.info>

__pse_control_release() drops psec->ps via devm_regulator_put(), which
only succeeds if the devres entry added by the matching
devm_regulator_get_exclusive() is still present on pcdev->dev at the
time the pse_control's kref hits zero.

In practice that assumption does not hold when the controller is
unbound while any pse_control still has consumers: pcdev->dev's
devres list is released LIFO, so every per-attach regulator-GET
devres runs (and regulator_put()s the underlying regulator) before
pse_controller_unregister() itself is invoked. Any later
pse_control_put() from that unbind path then reads psec->ps as a
dangling pointer inside devm_regulator_put() and WARNs at
drivers/regulator/devres.c:232 (devres_release() fails to find the
already-released match).

The pse_control's consumer handle is logically scoped to the
pse_control's refcount, not to pcdev->dev's devres lifetime. Switch
to the plain regulator_get_exclusive() / regulator_put() pair so
__pse_control_release() does the right put regardless of whether
the controller's devres has already been unwound.

No change to the regulator-framework-visible refcount or lifetime of
the underlying regulator: a single get paired with a single put. The
existing devm_regulator_register() for the per-PI rails is unchanged
(those ARE correctly scoped to the controller's lifetime).

Fixes: d83e13761d5b ("net: pse-pd: Use regulator framework within PSE framework")
Signed-off-by: Corey Leavitt <corey@leavitt.info>
Acked-by: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de>
---
This was patch 1 of the "decouple controller lookup from MDIO probe"
series [1]. Reposting it standalone for net as suggested, since it is a
self-contained fix. The rest of the series targets net-next and will be
resent once net-next reopens.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260620112440.1734404-1-github@szelinsky.de/
---
 drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c b/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c
index 69dbdbde9d71..a5e6d7b26b9f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c
@@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@ static void __pse_control_release(struct kref *kref)
 
 	if (psec->pcdev->pi[psec->id].admin_state_enabled)
 		regulator_disable(psec->ps);
-	devm_regulator_put(psec->ps);
+	regulator_put(psec->ps);
 
 	module_put(psec->pcdev->owner);
 
@@ -1436,8 +1436,8 @@ pse_control_get_internal(struct pse_controller_dev *pcdev, unsigned int index,
 		goto free_psec;
 
 	pcdev->pi[index].admin_state_enabled = ret;
-	psec->ps = devm_regulator_get_exclusive(pcdev->dev,
-						rdev_get_name(pcdev->pi[index].rdev));
+	psec->ps = regulator_get_exclusive(pcdev->dev,
+					   rdev_get_name(pcdev->pi[index].rdev));
 	if (IS_ERR(psec->ps)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(psec->ps);
 		goto put_module;

base-commit: d07d80b6a129a44538cda1549b7acf95154fb197
-- 
2.43.0


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-06-22 19:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260622192839.2508733-1-github@szelinsky.de \
    --to=github@szelinsky.de \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=corey@leavitt.info \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox