From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f181.google.com (mail-pl1-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B68234AB01 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2026 02:52:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.181 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782183121; cv=none; b=Ej85a9WC7LR2zJBfenrQ/oH4sHvppxtV7KJDbPfvVlc/BGmghPYeS6tGNzDPbI9BCtUBWOhHzAHz7qn+a1ziUSXl/EXIIx04zrHXDco3Hq05dxsfe4QeweSWFnnpajo8lo09Yri+iDu09lGsyWudfpQTdje3pWFgx8Os312jeGA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782183121; c=relaxed/simple; bh=p+nffAW408DMeJGJh50kWk8zhQg2b3tHyUIep+5bpYk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WEBt8KVMugA0OB7ELHTjsagxg9+pdVPYi9QEvNbDte8/t+ohD9+dF+u6484sG0pLo9oyxogJjToYjv+kw79af6s+q44Z2eyXxamPBgBHNHIuhiMS6YmCl9EBVG/aunUU3Gx0pK6K384kR1rriAFRixcwLBVyDynZmvRNeYLLy9c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=O/DR/nIg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.181 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="O/DR/nIg" Received: by mail-pl1-f181.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2c7c684353dso3479135ad.2 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2026 19:52:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1782183119; x=1782787919; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KV2chNMnw+kmRFfisbGqimiQM5mDTuIEZMht/aRpHIc=; b=O/DR/nIgi7j9J6O+k0kOUIYS6iTDPzoPM0oac4ANwIJvAhSBE8MDbijgo4KrNuGkl3 YZ9njHxQ2FjFEJxWkMT29p3GPI1RCFDW8IcuEyf2TyhyAX09h3+DNRRiVEwUQ6/5CqO4 5r5z4QXcEdRedSfd05g2Y1F2MgUnCsTsBmYPfOENKvIrBgbzUOiXY9VhDqqMvuYuCQrQ t0gi48TCtJAUSiEjHZh3mAZMbiqiSEUO/PKKDE+cfYDWvWopfYM3PFOQTxffD8udCDiG OWQ/xVRktN+AqltlgENRhIn8UqCYTq9MJi9R/nSsuCQiqtLgR7MiKUibALg9xii1KwQ2 B01Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1782183119; x=1782787919; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=KV2chNMnw+kmRFfisbGqimiQM5mDTuIEZMht/aRpHIc=; b=AF4G4qPXqJyddKQSW2h2zlcS7GXwKiKaVw1OTG6LXHCcY3ODh3CeZxTSpkI+Kas3NA QInHi12anuBJTGenAFLFyh1Tr6FKY+q6B8cziLhxITRtV6Mh7UYGAqaszSpaX/15Rbmh iQZ6BKQEmaABWEJNosuwAroysiBYEsLp7BvcsU0ENqKjrq9eVZxfHw0i1tx78JUc2laP vghEF9DloCHuWPxGKeRHM1LQ60DVzTnGz19hwTyIrVFQkClP2MaJ9t3uZ5GoH6cgqtec qz5uiObQsJ6ooXF+xBsUlSa59KUT/IXOqN5AAPUFu2aYQ/sog4vU4JVpz5wIoxQJEQ17 OafQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+Rpm5en0mZANghQ+/H3IqzPO7RUmh5kzRjHaLl8U7pp528cKenBBayfBn7ti2yozR9qPsieYGgo=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw7AwcpXxb86Fh+sn/B6MKCpL8Sek09xn3ZQ+JGm0cTftNn9nYo sjiWIl6koM33SB/8LjK3yO+u2gTLacI0QnW6pkxHVx6LcdINFAciE4O4 X-Gm-Gg: AfdE7cmXL2/5711IIbp3BhjOZ9+HXRoh9AL7ObRRutdvAge6uxrf9IDWrgXRHVHlJi+ NroP6qdl4Bs7vF7n4i+6BGUa3/IX6tGfsuqF68k3MwaGaq7+vRGQFw1bJtYHXscY8LXcGO9kBEJ 4o6kdhxtLdaQ1F8XM49bJ9AMVdL1RnMYevQ9/HwqDae6lcQ5iw3Y6ZCMSszOgcc5zXVz7G1GOYy 3uDDOTcUPIPV9so5lLlTGRfOl/Rh55U+uHrSwozevwG82fLcVW6XRH5vBsWyRHwb3Ors2oKWNFz C40tDFLJk3xnKNFSaw1a2NFkcaBoDCVe8YwMu8+u36vDh9cvcJBCTw1evbu5yxfxQVZzvzyd3yD k2/Ffp6nqmF0QWZvAYRaHphXeMd/lT75lcMf+7+jS8oxQeK/kA4U+utP1echY1FoZrwLD7aZoPe 48ww7ZErIi9j4Lj9PYcHVaZd/BBLeWEKZGadBknODSImCbzyT7d5P6mX+1EpPn X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e5c7:b0:2bf:379b:53d2 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2c7c995af52mr4223915ad.15.1782183119337; Mon, 22 Jun 2026 19:51:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r912.tailbb6e1e.ts.net ([182.70.116.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-2c7439f8e51sm102704625ad.39.2026.06.22.19.51.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Jun 2026 19:51:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Avinash Duduskar To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org Cc: eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org, emil@etsalapatis.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, hawk@kernel.org, yatsenko@meta.com, leon.hwang@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org, a.s.protopopov@gmail.com, ameryhung@gmail.com, rongtao@cestc.cn, eyal.birger@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, toke@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] bpf: bidirectional VLAN support for bpf_fib_lookup() Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 08:21:44 +0530 Message-ID: <20260623025147.1001664-1-avinash.duduskar@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.54.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This series adds VLAN awareness to bpf_fib_lookup() in both directions. BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN resolves a VLAN egress to its underlying real device plus the VLAN tag (XDP programs need this because VLAN devices have no XDP xmit), and BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN_INPUT runs the lookup as if a tagged frame had arrived on the matching VLAN subinterface, for iif policy routing and VRF table selection. The independent l3mdev/VRF flow-init fix, patch 1 in v1 and v2, was split out and merged to bpf separately. v4 changes what bpf_fib_lookup() returns in one case. v3 left a VLAN egress that cannot be reduced to a physical device plus one tag (a QinQ egress, or a parent in another namespace) as best-effort SUCCESS with the VLAN device's ifindex. In his v3 review Toke asked for a distinct error code there instead, so an XDP program cannot mistake an unresolved VLAN egress for a physical one, and suggested the name BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_VLAN_FAILURE; v4 implements that. The code is appended after BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_NO_SRC_ADDR (nothing renumbered, tools/ mirror updated) and is returned only when BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN is set, so no existing caller can observe it. On that failure params->ifindex is left at the input, like the input-side failures; a tc or XDP program that wants the VLAN device's own ifindex re-issues the lookup without the flag, the recovery path he described. The reason for a distinct code rather than best-effort SUCCESS: SUCCESS on an unreducible egress silently blackholed XDP. A redirect to the VLAN device drops at xdp_do_flush() with no in-band signal to the program; VLAN_FAILURE makes the unreducible case explicit, and a live-frames selftest exercises both the redirected and the passed paths. Only the immediate parent is resolved, so QinQ and foreign-netns are the unreducible cases; bond, team, TBID and VRF egress resolve, as the selftest table pins. Changes v3 -> v4: - Patch 1: return BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_VLAN_FAILURE for an unreducible VLAN egress, leaving params->ifindex at the input. - Patch 3: the QinQ-egress and cross-namespace-egress arms expect VLAN_FAILURE; an escape-hatch arm re-issues without the flag for the inner VLAN device's ifindex; and test_fib_lookup_vlan_redirect drives live frames (BPF_F_TEST_XDP_LIVE_FRAMES) through the native redirect path, asserting a reducible egress is delivered and a QinQ egress is passed to the stack. The selftest's VLAN_FAILURE arms are IPv4 only, since bpf_ipv6_fib_lookup() restores params->ifindex with the same code as the IPv4 path that the arms exercise. The three other v3 questions Toke marked fine as-is, and v4 keeps them: an unmatched, down, or cross-namespace tag on input returns NOT_FWDED; OUTPUT | VLAN_INPUT is rejected with -EINVAL; the BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN_INPUT name is kept. Taking the tag as lookup input follows the approach David Ahern suggested in the 2021 fwmark discussion: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/6248c547-ad64-04d6-fcec-374893cc1ef2@gmail.com/ v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260617224729.1428662-1-avinash.duduskar@gmail.com/ v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260616223426.3568080-1-avinash.duduskar@gmail.com/ v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260609172052.81613-1-avinash.duduskar@gmail.com/ Avinash Duduskar (3): bpf: Add BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN flag to bpf_fib_lookup() helper bpf: Add BPF_FIB_LOOKUP_VLAN_INPUT flag to bpf_fib_lookup() helper selftests/bpf: Add bpf_fib_lookup() VLAN flag tests include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 47 +- net/core/filter.c | 133 +++- tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 47 +- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fib_lookup.c | 696 +++++++++++++++++- .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fib_lookup.c | 36 + 5 files changed, 930 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) base-commit: a975094bf98ca97be9146f9d3b5681a6f9cf5ce3 -- 2.54.0