From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
<stfomichev@gmail.com>, <kernelxing@tencent.com>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <pabeni@redhat.com>, <ast@kernel.org>,
<daniel@iogearbox.net>, <tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>,
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] selftests/xsk: stabilize timeout test behavior
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 13:36:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623133633.34c6fad7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ajqfDYznpCU18C2P@boxer>
On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 16:58:21 +0200 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 11:02:48AM +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> > last refactor from Tushar broke BIDIRECTIONAL test case when HW is test
> > target, but not on veth, so let me test these changes locally and then get
> > back to you.
> >
> > BPF CI runs xskxceiver on veth so this has not been caught. Seems my/our
> > focus should be to enable xskxceiver HW tests on any kind of
> > environment/infrastructure.
> >
> > Gonna get back to you by the EOD.
> > Maciej
>
> Ah I replied on other thread I guess, so let me repeat:
>
> Acked-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Great, thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 15:49 [PATCH net-next 0/3] selftests/xsk: stabilize timeout test behavior Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-16 15:49 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] selftests/xsk: make poll timeout mode explicit Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-16 15:49 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] selftests/xsk: fix timeout thread harness sequencing Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-16 15:49 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] selftests/xsk: restore shared_umem after POLL_TXQ_FULL Tushar Vyavahare
2026-06-16 23:39 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] selftests/xsk: stabilize timeout test behavior Jason Xing
2026-06-17 9:43 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-06-17 10:03 ` Jason Xing
2026-06-22 23:07 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-22 23:48 ` Jason Xing
2026-06-23 9:02 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-06-23 14:58 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-06-23 20:36 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-06-23 14:56 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-06-23 20:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260623133633.34c6fad7@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
--cc=tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
--cc=tushar.vyavahare@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox