Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net: dsa: mxl862xx: avoid unaligned 16-bit access in api_wrap
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 17:52:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260624175239.1b97aaa6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260619100154.794168e5@pumpkin>

On Fri, 19 Jun 2026 10:01:54 +0100 David Laight wrote:
> > The MXL862XX_API_* macros pass the address of a stack-allocated, __packed
> > firmware-ABI struct to mxl862xx_api_wrap() as a void *. The struct has an
> > alignment of 1, so the compiler is free to place it at an odd address.
> > 
> > mxl862xx_api_wrap() reinterprets that buffer as a __le16 * and accesses it
> > with data[i], for which the compiler assumes the natural 2-byte alignment
> > of __le16 and emits aligned 16-bit loads/stores (e.g. lhu/sh on MIPS).
> > When the buffer lands on an odd address these fault on architectures that
> > do not support unaligned access, such as MIPS32.  
> 
> Isn't the correct fix to not pack the structure?
> (or probably any of the associated structures??)

Agreed, this is very silly:

struct mxl862xx_register_mod {
	__le16 addr;
	__le16 data;
	__le16 mask;
} __packed;

But some structs won't get aligned:

struct mxl862xx_mac_table_clear {
	u8 type;
	u8 port_id;
} __packed;

So I guess the "just don't pack" will have some corner cases, too.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-25  0:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-19  3:39 [PATCH net 1/2] net: dsa: mxl862xx: avoid unaligned 16-bit access in api_wrap Daniel Golle
2026-06-19  9:01 ` David Laight
2026-06-25  0:52   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-06-25  1:08 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260624175239.1b97aaa6@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=daniel@makrotopia.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox